Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: running with out a cat
niceperson709

posted on 10/6/09 at 03:44 AM Reply With Quote
running with out a cat

Ok guys I have a simple question on my car i have the standard double cat set up from the Nissan Pulsar donor (there is a cat in the exhaust manifold and a second one just before the first muffler.) Now I am considering deleting the second one when I rebuild the car in a couple of weeks and replacing it with a new section of 2 1/2 stainless tube that I just picked up at my favourite scrap metal place.
I am unconcerned about increased emissions because there is no annual testing where I live but I do wonder if it will make any difference to the tuning ?

Any ideas or experience out there?

I just think that since I am making a pretty new body for the car that I should have a better looking exhaust as well.

[Edited on 10/6/09 by niceperson709]





Best wishes IAIN
life is not the rehearsal , it's the show so don't sit there thinking about it DO IT NOW
http://iainseven.wordpress.com/


View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
A1

posted on 10/6/09 at 04:51 AM Reply With Quote
when i took the cat and silencer off my car it ran better, the throttle response was noticeably sharper and it seemed to accelerate faster.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
l0rd

posted on 10/6/09 at 05:17 AM Reply With Quote
If i was you, I would remove both. Specialy the one in the manifold.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
smart51

posted on 10/6/09 at 07:08 AM Reply With Quote
Is there a lambda sensor after the second cat? No? Then the electronics won't know it has been removed. In which case I'd have thought it would be OK.

As for an increase in emissions, I doubt it. Cat converters change CO and partly burned fuel into CO2 - one form of pollution into another. The total volume doesn't change. Removing the cat may even reduce your fuel consumption slightly, reducing overall emissions.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
niceperson709

posted on 10/6/09 at 07:50 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks guys what you have been saying matches what I have been thinking.
Smart 51
the lambada sensor is on the exhaust manifold so as you suggest the engine won't notice the difference.

l0rd
I would think about removing both but I am not quite ready to make an entire exhaust manifold

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
l0rd

posted on 10/6/09 at 07:51 AM Reply With Quote
After having a discussion with my mechanic about improving the performance of my Laguna 1.8 16v, He adviced me to change the manifold to a 2.0L one and also to stick a bar through the manifold cat.
The only worry will be when you do an emission test, in order not to fail, you need to have the car warmed up and the normal cat should be perfectly all right for the test.

I have seen on a Dyno, a Renault Megane II 1.6 (115HP factory claim) that produced 123HP without the manifold cat and 128HP with an unbranded induction kit.

I am not saying that you can do that. I am not to be held responsible if anything goes wrong. This is what i was told and what i have seen.

[Edited on 10/6/09 by l0rd]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
l0rd

posted on 10/6/09 at 07:53 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by niceperson709
Thanks guys what you have been saying matches what I have been thinking.
Smart 51
the lambada sensor is on the exhaust manifold so as you suggest the engine won't notice the difference.

l0rd
I would think about removing both but I am not quite ready to make an entire exhaust manifold


I din't say make an exhaust manifold. If you can get a spare one, you can just remove the cat and check the diference

[Edited on 10/6/09 by l0rd]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
niceperson709

posted on 10/6/09 at 08:10 AM Reply With Quote
l0rd
I had not thought of getting handy with an iron bar to the cat matrix in the manifold but it would reduce restrictions in the exhaust without altering the appearance.
so thanks fro the idea





Best wishes IAIN
life is not the rehearsal , it's the show so don't sit there thinking about it DO IT NOW
http://iainseven.wordpress.com/


View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
l0rd

posted on 10/6/09 at 08:24 AM Reply With Quote
Just try to get hold of a second one if possible. You do not want to get any ECU errors.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 10/6/09 at 09:09 AM Reply With Quote
I had a MR2 turbo, broke the cat up in situ within the manifold, it made the car much faster, turbo spooled up really quickly and made no difference to the ECU.

Regards Mark

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
smart51

posted on 10/6/09 at 09:25 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by niceperson709
Smart 51
the lambada sensor is on the exhaust manifold so as you suggest the engine won't notice the difference.


If your car has 1 lambda sensor and it is before the cat then removing the cat shouldn't affect it. Some cars have 2 sensors, one before and one after the cat. It uses the second sensor to fine tune the fuelling. You'd probably need to leave it alone.

My understanding is that you can change anything after the last sensor and the ECU won't know any different.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 10/6/09 at 09:43 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by smart51
Some cars have 2 sensors, one before and one after the cat. It uses the second sensor to fine tune the fuelling. You'd probably need to leave it alone.


This is found on OBDII equipped cars, and is to tell the ECU how well the cat is working, i.e. it's purely for emissions warning than fuelling.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
smart51

posted on 10/6/09 at 10:15 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
quote:
Originally posted by smart51
Some cars have 2 sensors, one before and one after the cat. It uses the second sensor to fine tune the fuelling. You'd probably need to leave it alone.


This is found on OBDII equipped cars, and is to tell the ECU how well the cat is working, i.e. it's purely for emissions warning than fuelling.


Are you sure? I'm fairly certain that Euro 4 and 5 cars fine tune their fuelling for aggressive emissions limits by looking at the excess air both sides of the cat.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 10/6/09 at 12:20 PM Reply With Quote
My Kia failed on emissions last year and when I took the front pipe off it was completely hollow. I replaced the cat and can say it has not made a bit of difference to performance or noise (it's still noisy and slow )





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 10/6/09 at 01:59 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by smart51

Are you sure? I'm fairly certain that Euro 4 and 5 cars fine tune their fuelling for aggressive emissions limits by looking at the excess air both sides of the cat.


Quite sure. The only useful information that can be gained by an oxygen sensor after the cat is how well the cat is working. The ECU looks at the difference between the pre-cat and post-cat oxygen sensors, a similar reading on both indicates the cat is not doing it's job.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 10/6/09 at 04:02 PM Reply With Quote
Failed emmisions without a cat is usually down to a lazy lambda sensor, they should be replaced on a regular basis but just get left alone.

Regards Mark

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
niceperson709

posted on 10/6/09 at 10:47 PM Reply With Quote
Emissions is not an issue Mark because they do not test for that here.

Thanks to all here for your help, it looks like one cat will go in the bin and the other will be getting the iron bar treatment






Best wishes IAIN
life is not the rehearsal , it's the show so don't sit there thinking about it DO IT NOW
http://iainseven.wordpress.com/


View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
andkilde

posted on 11/6/09 at 12:54 AM Reply With Quote
quote:

Some cars have 2 sensors, one before and one after the cat. It uses the second sensor to fine tune the fueling. You'd probably need to leave it alone.




If you're saddled with an OBD II system you can purchase O2 bung "extenders" which take the one of O2 sensors out of the exhaust stream to fool the ECU into thinking the cat is functioning properly as well. You might be able to fiddle the signal with a resistor as well.

For the most part, a "bad" or missing cat will throw a Check Engine code without causing the engine to run poorly, the 1st O2 sensor is the one used to measure mixture for closed-loop operation, the second is just an emissions system health indicator. In this case, the "fault" can be cured with gaffer tape or wire cutters

Some cars may be programmed to go into "limp" mode with any fault though.

Cheers, Ted

[Edited on 11/6/09 by andkilde]

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.