Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Pull the other one!!
myke pocock

posted on 26/8/17 at 01:14 PM Reply With Quote
Pull the other one!!

So EXACTLY what Rickman parts were used? Youre avin a giraffe!!!

MK Track Race Car 2013 Blisteringly Quick Just 4000 Miles

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
r1_pete

posted on 26/8/17 at 01:22 PM Reply With Quote
Another IAT - IVA Avoidance Tactic....
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
nero1701

posted on 26/8/17 at 01:46 PM Reply With Quote
Looking for "factory built" in the listing
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
owelly

posted on 26/8/17 at 03:04 PM Reply With Quote
Strange how they dropped the word 'Rickman' from the title in the first listing: MK Track Race Car 2013 Blisteringly Quick Rickman Just 4000 Miles





http://www.ppcmag.co.uk

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Shooter63

posted on 26/8/17 at 05:07 PM Reply With Quote
The reason they may have dropped the Rickman bit is that I messaged them and told them it's a ringer I hate all this sort of crap, I've got a classic mini as well and the market is full of late model cars on pre 60's plates .

Shooter

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
myke pocock

posted on 26/8/17 at 05:20 PM Reply With Quote
Someone paid nearly 6 grand for a dodgy motor. I hope it bites them on the bum in the future.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
nero1701

posted on 26/8/17 at 05:26 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by myke pocock
Someone paid nearly 6 grand for a dodgy motor. I hope it bites them on the bum in the future.


We are lucky enough to understand the legalities of blatent ringers. Not all of Joe public does. If anything I feel sorry for them.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
r1_pete

posted on 26/8/17 at 06:24 PM Reply With Quote
Its a shame you can no longer see buyers bidding on these things to be able to drop them a word to the wise....
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ivan

posted on 27/8/17 at 05:38 PM Reply With Quote
Why would you want 6 reverse gears???????
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
rusty nuts

posted on 27/8/17 at 06:15 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ivan
Why would you want 6 reverse gears???????



To drive backwards as fast as you can forward? Reminds me of the jokes about Italian tanks from WW2

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
CosKev3

posted on 27/8/17 at 06:57 PM Reply With Quote
What was/is a Rickman?

Never seen that name before

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
kingster996

posted on 27/8/17 at 07:36 PM Reply With Quote
Rickman was a manufacturer of motorbike chassis in the 70s. They also produced a couple of kit cars.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickman_Motorcycles






I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
SJ

posted on 27/8/17 at 07:55 PM Reply With Quote
The Rickman Ranger was a Ford based pseudo 4x4.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
CosKev3

posted on 27/8/17 at 08:38 PM Reply With Quote
So nothing like a MK at all!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
kingster996

posted on 27/8/17 at 08:41 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by CosKev3
So nothing like a MK at all!

Nope but then again neither is a Dutton :-)






I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
RoadkillUK

posted on 27/8/17 at 09:03 PM Reply With Quote
Shows as a Red Rickman from Sept. '89

Q482TWN
Q482TWN






Roadkill - Lee
www.bradford7.co.uk
Latest Picture (14 Sept 2014)

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
wylliezx9r

posted on 27/8/17 at 09:09 PM Reply With Quote
Some poor person has bought a lemon. Will probably be fine until he/she goes to mot it next year.





I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered.
George Best

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
David Jenkins

posted on 27/8/17 at 09:28 PM Reply With Quote
The ad says it hasn't met its reserve yet... wonder why...

[Edited on 27/8/17 by David Jenkins]






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
r1_pete

posted on 27/8/17 at 10:49 PM Reply With Quote
He's re listed it due to time wasters and dreamers, probably someone taking the time to check it out and dreaming of a correctly registered car.

Bit off topic but can anyone id the bonnet bulge on that car for me, it looks just what I need to cover the V8 in my 944.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
SCAR

posted on 28/8/17 at 07:09 AM Reply With Quote
Perhaps a 1967 spartan would be a better buy
kit car
or a DAX from 1960
https://img.pistonheads.com/LargeSize/kit-cars/dax/kit-cars-dax-S3072855-1.jpg

[Edited on 28/8/17 by SCAR]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
mcerd1

posted on 28/8/17 at 12:30 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by RoadkillUK
Shows as a Red Rickman from Sept. '89

Q482TWN
Q482TWN



the MOT history shows it as a Green MK Indy registered on 01/01/1971 - so not much better

also has quite a few MOT failures too - nothing says a quality build like a string of MOT failures from day 1.....

quote:

MK INDI
MOT valid until
17 September 2017

Registration
Q482TWN

Fuel type
Petrol

Colour
Green
Date registered
1 January 1971
Check another vehicle
Incorrect details?
MOT history

Date tested
18 September 2016
Mileage
389 miles
MOT test number
8123 8283 5112
PASS
Expiry date
17 September 2017


Date tested
14 August 2016
Mileage
9 miles
MOT test number
3220 7423 3800
FAIL
Reason(s) for failure
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)


Date tested
12 March 2015
Mileage
Unreadable
MOT test number
1658 8187 5061
PASS
Expiry date
11 March 2016


Date tested
7 March 2015
Mileage
Unreadable
MOT test number
1599 2616 5064
FAIL
Reason(s) for failure
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)


Date tested
20 July 2013
Mileage
Not present
MOT test number
6289 8140 3238
PASS
Expiry date
19 July 2014
Advisory notice item(s)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)


Date tested
19 July 2013
Mileage
Not present
MOT test number
3958 3030 3471
FAIL
Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate missing (6.3.1a)
Nearside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)
Advisory notice item(s)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)


Date tested
4 July 2013
Mileage
Not present
MOT test number
4777 3548 3156
FAIL
Reason(s) for failure
Nearside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Advisory notice item(s)
offside front brake low effort
nearside front brake low effort







-

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.