Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: FU 1 & 2
Mix

posted on 23/4/04 at 10:25 AM Reply With Quote
FU 1 & 2

Is this a viable modification ?


I'm in the process of fitting tubes FU 1 & 2 and have made a jig to allign the wishbone brackets. I am using the book design for the bottom bone but I will modify the top bone to suit re. castor angle. I am considering alligning the tops of the FU tubes with the J tubes, (rather than setting them slightly inboard), when I do this the bottom of the FU tubes coincide with the outer edges of tube E.
Am I correct in thinking that this will have little effect on the integrity of the chassis ?

An additional benefit is improved access to the lower bone rear bolt.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
mangogrooveworkshop

posted on 23/4/04 at 10:54 AM Reply With Quote
This is the dsk mods vs catervan Rescued attachment dsk chassis.jpg
Rescued attachment dsk chassis.jpg







View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mangogrooveworkshop

posted on 23/4/04 at 11:05 AM Reply With Quote
got a s2 pic (a lot less tubes) less horse power in those days Broken tubes common place the history books tell me. R&D was to build it race it and fixit if it broke......brave or stupid. Rescued attachment Lotus7S2.gif
Rescued attachment Lotus7S2.gif







View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mix

posted on 23/4/04 at 12:09 PM Reply With Quote
Here's a photo of what I mean Rescued attachment FU1.jpg
Rescued attachment FU1.jpg

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
James

posted on 23/4/04 at 01:25 PM Reply With Quote
Mick,

I don't see any problem with what you suggest- mine is much the same (not that I've driven mine to see if it falls apart)!

And you're right about the benefit of access to the bolt!

HTH,

James

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
cymtriks

posted on 27/4/04 at 11:54 AM Reply With Quote
My analysis of spaceframes shows that small changes to how tubes meet and small offsets such as the one shown make very small differences to chassis strength and stiffness.

By the way I wouldn't omit the triangulation from the seat sides. This is important as it feeds the loads from the spring mounts into the sides and also helps support the axle trailing arms and the seat belt anchorage. The curved tubes have little stiffness of their own and are there to give the right shape, not to add strength. Take a look at my double Y braced chassis designs in the photos section. I reckon that that is as good as it gets without departing too far from the book.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
jcduroc

posted on 27/4/04 at 01:27 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by cymtriks
... By the way I wouldn't omit the triangulation from the seat sides. This is important as it feeds the loads from the spring mounts into the sides and also helps support the axle trailing arms and the seat belt anchorage...

Hi Chris
BTW, how come the loads from the coilovers "diverted" through the chassis as per the book? Do you agree that most of the rear section (except for the mounting of the Panhrad rod) does nothing but hold the body?

Cheers
Joćo





JCM

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 27/4/04 at 04:17 PM Reply With Quote
And you're right about the benefit of access to the bolt

There is no problem with access to the bolt, put the bolt in from the other end and put the nut on the end near the fu tube like everybody else does. If you mount a tube across the chassis where the fu tubes sit you could mount them directly in line with the front assembly tubes. How would that affect chassis strength?





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
James

posted on 27/4/04 at 05:15 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Peteff
There is no problem with access to the bolt, put the bolt in from the other end and put the nut on the end near the fu tube like everybody else does.



Perhaps I worded that wrongly- what I meant was that with some setups (including Luego's race chassis) the end of the bolt goes through the side of FU1/2. Luego's chassis has a couple of holes drilled in FU1/2 to allow the end of the thread to protrude into it.

quote:
Originally posted by Peteff
If you mount a tube across the chassis where the fu tubes sit you could mount them directly in line with the front assembly tubes. How would that affect chassis strength?


Feeling thick- not quite sure what you mean by this.

All the best,
James

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeP

posted on 27/4/04 at 05:56 PM Reply With Quote
I set the bottom of my FU's inboard like what's shown in the photo. Not quite as far I think, just enough for the bolt threads to slip by. If these bolts behave like other pivot bolts I've had the displeasure of dealing in the past, I'll be happy to be able to get a punch on the end of them some day.

I've also appreciated how easy it makes it to take them in and out so many times during my build - a quick tap and out they come.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.