Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Pro's n con's opinions req'd
Jon Ison

posted on 8/10/05 at 03:38 PM Reply With Quote
Pro's n con's opinions req'd

Rear engined BEC, so engine is mounted same as in bike........

What would happen (with a good oiling system) if the engine was inclined forward by say 10-15* would be possible too get a better angle into the carbs / throttle bodies for the intake flow maybe ? mount the engine a tad lower maybe ?

would the engine like it though..... thoughts ? pro's con's.......






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
kb58

posted on 8/10/05 at 04:42 PM Reply With Quote
It's too vague a question, all bike engines will be fine... to a point. What G forces will it see, that answers the question. It all depends on the oiling system. I do know that the Hayabusa needs a dry-sump when put in a road car, especially one intended for the track, but the R1 does not... so it all depends.





Mid-engine Locost - http://www.midlana.com
And the book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/midlana/paperback/product-21330662.html
Kimini - a tube-frame, carbon shell, Honda Prelude VTEC mid-engine Mini: http://www.kimini.com
And its book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/kimini-how-to-design-and-build-a-mid-engine-sports-car-from-scratch/paperback/product-4858803.html

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
ChrisGamlin

posted on 8/10/05 at 04:59 PM Reply With Quote
Hi Jon

If its an injected engine and you had a dry sump made that would ensure it picked up the oil where its going to run to, then I cant think of anything else that would cause issues.
If carbs, then it might be more difficult. They will be quite sensitive to angle as the float bowls etc need to be at the same set angle as if the engine was upright.
What do you mean by improving the intake flow by changing the angles? Generally bike carbs / TBs are dead straight onto the ports so any angle change would add a bend into the intake system so wouldnt improve things I wouldnt think.

cheers

Chris






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Jon Ison

posted on 8/10/05 at 05:03 PM Reply With Quote
chris i'm thinking 2 things

1
it would lift in my case the sprocket and allow me too run the chain where i want too and add a chassis rail where i want too (stiffen rear end up

2
The intakes are pointing backwards ? the air as too turn something like 130* to go down the trumpets from a forward facing air box this could be cut down ? may not make a difference just pondering and listening to peoples thoughts.


Vague ? bike engine mounted in rear engined car, same orientation as bike but tipped / rolled forward as if the bike was riding down hill........

[Edited on 8/10/05 by Jon Ison]






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
kb58

posted on 8/10/05 at 05:18 PM Reply With Quote
If you tip it too far oil may have a hard time returning from the cams to the sump. I've seen that happen. Again, "too far" is all relative, depending on the engine and what it's subjected to.





Mid-engine Locost - http://www.midlana.com
And the book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/midlana/paperback/product-21330662.html
Kimini - a tube-frame, carbon shell, Honda Prelude VTEC mid-engine Mini: http://www.kimini.com
And its book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/kimini-how-to-design-and-build-a-mid-engine-sports-car-from-scratch/paperback/product-4858803.html

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
ChrisGamlin

posted on 8/10/05 at 05:32 PM Reply With Quote
Ah I see what you mean, I was thinking inlet tract straightness rather than airflow from the outside into the airbox etc.

TBH I dont think it would make any difference on that score, a good airbox should provide virtually still air in front of the carbs / tb's anyway, it shouldnt flow straight in and down the inlet throats as it would still be turbulent then, meaning less air getting into the engine.

Chris






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
tks

posted on 9/10/05 at 09:38 PM Reply With Quote
an f1 airbox

is the same idea...

just straight air gets in..and goes down..

or am i talking rubissh now?

TKS

p.s. for engine angle i took on my car the sump as reference and the tipical honda lines/stripes..





The above comments are always meant to be from the above persons perspective.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ChrisGamlin

posted on 10/10/05 at 11:38 AM Reply With Quote
The air doesnt flow straight in and down the throttles, ie if the car is doing 100mph does not mean the air goes down the throttles at 100mph, the air will be still until its sucked in by the engine.

This is how I understand it....

Im pretty certain an F1 airbox works like any other ram air type airbox, whereby the aim is to build up air pressure inside the airbox to force more air into the engine when the throttles open. To do this, there must be more air going into the airbox than is being consumed by the engine. The air that is in the airbox waiting to be swallowed by the engine will be still. The air coming in behind this stationary air will gradually slow down and also become stationary, but in the process will be pressurising the already stationary air inside the airbox.

Think of a water reserviour created with a dam across a river to restrict its path. The water level will build up behind the dam, and where the water flows through the small hole in the dam it will be forced through under more pressure because of the increased water level behind it. However, its flow through the dam is not actually directly affected by the speed of the water flowing into the reserviour because the water immediately behind the dam is actually still, not flowing. If the upstream water speed suddenly increased, the speed of water through the dam would increase, but only because the water level behind the dam would be getting higher (so increasing pressure), not because the increase in water speed is actually pushing it through faster.

Chris






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Jon Ison

posted on 10/10/05 at 03:03 PM Reply With Quote
Chris great description, wont it slow me down a little pulling a dam behind me ?






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ChrisGamlin

posted on 10/10/05 at 06:17 PM Reply With Quote
LOL, you'll have an advantage at most Cadwell meetings tho






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.