Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Chassis alignment in a middy
RazMan

posted on 4/10/07 at 08:49 PM Reply With Quote
Chassis alignment in a middy

I'm interested in how other middy builders set their cars up, particularly the front end camber, castor etc.

I'm having self centering issues which I would like to dial out if I can.

Here's my setup as it stands.

Ride Height - Front 120mm Rear 140mm
Camber - Front 1.75 degrees neg Rear 1 degree neg
Toe in - Front 0.5mm Rear 1mm
Castor - Nominal 4 degrees (dictated by Tina uprights)


Any suggestions?





Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Chippy

posted on 4/10/07 at 09:23 PM Reply With Quote
Hi Raz. only an idea, worked on my car, but yours is rear engine, so questionable. I had S/C problems so put my front wheels at total upright, "ie" zero camber, which helped, (gave SVA pass). The total cure was to remake my front bones with 6deg's of caster, although it did pass SVA without them being remade, but wasn't happy myself . Cheers Ray
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
NeilP

posted on 4/10/07 at 10:12 PM Reply With Quote
Mike,

Too much or too little SC?...

Too little I assume in which case poss. too much neg camber reducing tyre contact patch and moving it inwards towards or even beyond virtual point of force line from shock down through tyre i.e. slightly less neg camber moves the central point of the tyre contact patch outwards (by both physically moving it and extending the size of the contact patch) beyond VP hence greater lever effect applied to wheel to centre?...

Or I could be talking [techfilter]nutsacks[/techfilter]

[Edited on 4/10/2007 by NeilP]





If you pay peanuts...
Mentale, yar? Yar, mentale!
Drive it like you stole it!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
RazMan

posted on 4/10/07 at 11:27 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks for the input guys.

The self centering is not a big problem but I would just like to bring it more in line with a 'normal' car - tbh I am still amazed it got through sva because it was even worse then!

The steering column was binding on the lower bush and replacing it with a spherical bearing improved it a little, but it's still not brilliant, and I really need to concentrate when taking junctions sometimes. SWMBO is now making 'I wanna drive' noises so I would really like to sort it out properly before she gets in the driving seat.

My upper wishbones are designed with adjustment in mind and I can dial in a little more castor but even 5/6 degrees didn't seem to make much difference and just reduced the tyre clearance in the arch. I could try to reduce the camber a little and see what happens but I am rather reluctant to make radical changes because these settings were supposed to be about right for a middy. The tyres are wearing pretty well although the rears are showing signs of increased wear on the inside - maybe less camber there?

Perhaps another visit to a workshop with laser equipment is called for to re-check everything accurately - 10k miles can probably make a lot of mountings settle a bit.





Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
russbost

posted on 5/10/07 at 08:01 AM Reply With Quote
Increasing caster should improve self centering, sometimes quite a lot is required tho'





I no longer run Furore Products or Furore Cars Ltd, but would still highly recommend them for Acewell dashes, projector headlights, dominator headlights, indicators, mirrors etc, best prices in the UK! Take a look at http://www.furoreproducts.co.uk/ or find more parts on Ebay, user names furoreltd & furoreproducts, discounts available for LCB users.
Don't forget Stainless Steel Braided brake hoses, made to your exact requirements in any of around 16 colours. http://shop.ebay.co.uk/furoreproducts/m.html?_dmd=1&_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc=1

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Fred W B

posted on 5/10/07 at 08:02 AM Reply With Quote
Hi Raz

I've sent you a mail that has 3 different approaches to setting up a GT 40, which might help

Cheers

Fred W B





You can do it quickly. You can do it cheap. You can do it right. – Pick any two.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
RazMan

posted on 5/10/07 at 10:29 AM Reply With Quote
I managed to get in touch with the guy who originally set up my car a year ago and he tells me that the settings above are indeed a good starting point.
To improve self centering I can use the lower trailing link to rotate the upright a bit more - anything over 4 degrees is considered a bonus but I am going to just tweak it a little each time and see how it goes (I don't have any alignment equipment) This might move the tracking a little but my local garage can handle that I think

He also suggests reducing front camber to around 1.25 degrees and rear to 1 degree - this should also improve tyre wear a little at the expense of a little less grip on the rear but probably only noticeable on the track.

Just to clarify, here is a pic of my setup (not my car though)

*edit* Thanks for the email Fred - very useful indeed


[Edited on 5-10-07 by RazMan] Rescued attachment Suspension top view front
Rescued attachment Suspension top view front






Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
v8kid

posted on 5/10/07 at 10:42 AM Reply With Quote
Hi Raz,

I had a similar problem with a past car and it turned out the rim offset was wrong. I managed to cure it by adding additional caster but it was never really wonderfull. Can you borrow a wheel with a different offset and see if it cures it?

Cheers

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Fred W B

posted on 5/10/07 at 01:59 PM Reply With Quote
Some others have asked so I'll post the GT40 info. It's just rough cut and pasted

Cheers

Fred W B



There is no definitive setting that will work for everyone and every situation ...if there were...all production/race cars would look and drive the same ......and we all know there is no chance of that ........but here is a good place to start for an RCR....your results may vary

Front
Toe in 30 minutes
Camber -20 to -30 minutes
Castor 5-6 deg

Rear
Toe-in 20 minutes
Camber -10 to -20 minutes
Castor 5-7 deg

1 Deg = 60 minutes...

Ride height at Front axle CL 4 1/2 inches
Ride height at Rear axle CL 5 1/2 inches

Hope this helps.....
__________________
FRAN HALL replica manufacturer.....


Gt40

The car I built was set up as follows

KPI 5º34min
Camber -0º30min
Caster 6º
Toe In 0º30min
Scrub radius 110 mm (306mm Rol rad)
Steering arm 125mm
Ackerman was near zero (cant recall exact figure)
4º Roll gave 30' toe out
Standard Mk 2 escort rack
225/65-15 Avon front tyres
48% front mass
52% rear mass
Total mass 1250 kg c/w 68litres fuel and 2 occ

This was one handed steering at 140 mph. heavier at slower speeds but we drove all day in the Targa Tas and it was not tiring to drive.

Admittedly this was on road tyres. Certainly your car would be heavier steering with wider wheels and slicks but not that heavy.


My setup.

4 deg King pin
3 deg Caster
3 deg Ackerman
0 camber
20mm scrub
235's
2.7 turn 240Z rack
13 in steering wheel

easy to park, good turn radius
one handed steering at any speed
tracks nice, light and quick like a go kart.





You can do it quickly. You can do it cheap. You can do it right. – Pick any two.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 5/10/07 at 03:04 PM Reply With Quote
One of of things that strike me first of all I suspect you may be getting unwanted toe-in when the the steering is turned.

The steering rack needs be moved back a bit relative to the track rod end ball centres.
should look more like this


[Edited on 5/10/07 by britishtrident] Rescued attachment fre.JPG
Rescued attachment fre.JPG






[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
RazMan

posted on 5/10/07 at 05:03 PM Reply With Quote
That's interesting, I haven't come across that suggestion before. I would be worried about introducing bump steer though and the rack would be a real bitch to move now.
There is absolutely no bump steer with the current setup so I would imagine that any unwanted toe-in must be minimal except on full lock.
I notice there are two types of track ends. The type in the pic has a kink in it which throws the track arm forward a little (mine is central) Does this affect anything?

I have managed to get an extra degree or so of castor by maxing out the trailing link adjustment. I think it MAY have improved the self centering a tiny bit - could be my wishful thinking though
I also checked the camber and while the fronts were ok, the rears were a long way out so they must have settled quite a bit (over 2 deg). I have now corrected this but havent had a chance to road test yet.

[Edited on 5-10-07 by RazMan]





Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
RazMan

posted on 5/10/07 at 05:31 PM Reply With Quote
I probably didn't describe the track rod ends very well so here's a pic

So what is the effect of using a or b?
*edit* Is it anything to do with the Ackerman angle?

[Edited on 7-10-07 by RazMan] Rescued attachment Track Rod Ends.jpg
Rescued attachment Track Rod Ends.jpg






Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Doug68

posted on 8/10/07 at 10:34 AM Reply With Quote
This is what I plan to do when I get to this stage. This is based on my GP250 motorcycle racing experience, setting a vehicle up at a race track can be stressful event what with limited session slots and often limited run off. So it's to be avoided unless you have all day ready access to the track.

Get yourself a g meter then book a day at skid pan, there must be one in Essex you can use I'm sure.

Come up with a plan (very important) to go through a full practical range of adjustments for what you can adjust and camber, tyre pressure etc

Drive around in 100' circles measure the g, write (very important) down what the car does and go until the you find the best combo.

Also make big adjustments, for example go from the highest tyre pressure to the lowest and then zero in the middle in say 5 psi steps or you wont be able to feel the difference, which is just confusing.

Test all the setting even if you know they wont work, if you get what you expect from a setting then you've confirmed you understand the vehicle.

Finally do this where it won't hurt when you lose control as the point is to find out where exactly you lose control and what happens when you do.

Fred's GT40 may well be close for me (thanks Fred). But I'd suspect you are carrying more rear weight and different tyre sizes to a typical GT40 so they may be a bit off for you.

All of the above is just my HO





Doug. 1TG
Sports Car Builders WA

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.