Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Dedion tube positioning
niceperson709

posted on 26/6/05 at 10:05 PM Reply With Quote
Dedion tube positioning

Hi Folks
I've been offered the rear end out of a 180b Datsun and as it is an independant jobbie I have been thinking of using it in my +50 Locost as a replacement for the live axel that I have already fitted by using a de dion set up and my question is this is there any reason why I can't site the de dion tube higher relative to the axel line so it is say in line with the top of the side links rather than the center as is the more usual arangement , This way I could retain all of my existing suspension links as they are now , including the panhard rod and not have to alter the rear of the chassis ( made as per the book ) . I am not to concerned about the Ratio of the diff and these units have a bomb proof reputattion so should easily be up to the job .
I have spent a bit of time looking through the archive but as far as I can see no one has deviated from a tube placement centered between the side links .
Best wishes
Iain





Best wishes IAIN
life is not the rehearsal , it's the show so don't sit there thinking about it DO IT NOW
http://iainseven.wordpress.com/


View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Bob C

posted on 27/6/05 at 11:15 AM Reply With Quote
2 things
1) dedion "strut" must be horizontal at ride height
2) roll centre (if you believe...) is at height of strut in middle of car - is that where you want your roll centre???
Bob C

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Bob C

posted on 27/6/05 at 11:16 AM Reply With Quote
I mean panhard rod - sorry
Bob

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Bob C

posted on 27/6/05 at 11:17 AM Reply With Quote
and it'snot that you wanted to move.
I'll get me coat....
Bob

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
niceperson709

posted on 27/6/05 at 01:01 PM Reply With Quote
Hi Bob
One of the rasons that I wanted to do it the way I discribed was to maintain the panhard rod being level at ride hight as you have clearly worked out . I thend to think that there is no reason not to do as I have sugested . thanks for the input Bob
Best wishes
Iain





Best wishes IAIN
life is not the rehearsal , it's the show so don't sit there thinking about it DO IT NOW
http://iainseven.wordpress.com/


View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 27/6/05 at 04:40 PM Reply With Quote
It will work - you might have to set it with a tiny bit more toe-in and negative camber than the conventional design.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
niceperson709

posted on 27/6/05 at 09:55 PM Reply With Quote
"It will work - you might have to set it with a tiny bit more toe-in and negative camber than the conventional design."
just one small question why would it be any different to any other set up ?
Best wishes
Iain





Best wishes IAIN
life is not the rehearsal , it's the show so don't sit there thinking about it DO IT NOW
http://iainseven.wordpress.com/


View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.