Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: escort steering rack ratio
ady8077

posted on 8/8/05 at 07:06 PM Reply With Quote
escort steering rack ratio

Hi

Does anyone no the standard ratio for a mk2 escort rack ?

I've been looking for a quick rack and most seem to be 2.4 and cost about £110, but i've just spotted this on raldes

http://www.rallydesign.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=900_1332_1331&products_id=10557

Is 2.9 much quicker than standard?

Adrian

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
David Jenkins

posted on 8/8/05 at 07:58 PM Reply With Quote
As it happens, I have a Haynes Escort manual by my right elbow!

It says that the standard rack is 3.5 turns from end to end.

David






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
ady8077

posted on 9/8/05 at 04:59 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks Dave

Will 2.9 be quick enough? its half the price of a 2.4

Adrian

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Stu16v

posted on 9/8/05 at 09:37 PM Reply With Quote
Depends on what you intend to do with the car. For road/some track use, the standard (3.5) turn rack is more than adequate. I had a standard ratio rack in my Westfield, and I can't say that a higher ratio rack would of been a 'must have'.
However, I fitted a 2.2 to the Locost. For lairy tail slides, it's a must...





Dont just build it.....make it!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
JAG

posted on 10/8/05 at 07:42 AM Reply With Quote
I was just thinking the same;

I have a 3.5 turns Escort rack and the car is twitchy enough Thanks

I guess it's due to the light weight of these cars but the steering is very light (even with a 260mm steering wheel) and requires very little inattention to start wandering all over the road





Justin


Who is this super hero? Sarge? ...No.
Rosemary, the telephone operator? ...No.
Penry, the mild-mannered janitor? ...Could be!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
APR

posted on 10/8/05 at 05:39 PM Reply With Quote
the standard rack is hard work on the steering wheel with a heavy right foot fitted a 2.2 and life is fun at the roundabouts
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
ady8077

posted on 10/8/05 at 06:09 PM Reply With Quote
thanks for replies

I have a standard rack fitted and it seems ok, but i'm fitting a quaife lsd and i'm worried i might not catch it if i over do it

For the price of the 2.9 i might try it as my standard rack is secondhand

Adrian

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ernie

posted on 10/8/05 at 06:40 PM Reply With Quote
I got a new one from Rally design, and its very good using it on locost race car. Most equipmet from them is top goods and cheaper than most
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Liam

posted on 12/9/05 at 01:04 AM Reply With Quote
Wow!! I was just gonna ask this exact question, having seen the super cheap 2.9s on Rally Design.

Rotating my standard jobby, it seems more like 3.7 than 3.5. Anyway I'm slightly concerned a proper 2.4 may be a little too much, especially with my relatively heavy and driven front end and my 260mm caterham wheel. This 2.9 in-a-slight-hurry-rack might be just the job!! Anyone got one yet and have anything to report?? Will I still be catching slides and getting round hairpins without crossing hands?

Cheers,

Liam

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 12/9/05 at 07:57 AM Reply With Quote
with 4x4 Liam, I'd definitely go for the 2.9 rack.

Your car will be more stable and less lairy than most anyway with the 4x4, and with a 2.9 rack you'll be more "in charge" when the drive to the front wheels starts to pull on your arms a bit.

My XR4x4 has the std ford 2.8 turn rack and I get pretty out of shape in that fairly regularly and it is very easy to catch.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Jasper

posted on 12/9/05 at 11:31 AM Reply With Quote
I found the 2.2 rather twitchy at high speak on bumpy country roads too, I wouldn't have one that fast again. 2.9 sounds a good idea.

[Edited on 12/9/05 by Jasper]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 12/9/05 at 12:11 PM Reply With Quote
I love fast ratio racks, I have to say! The grasser is 0.8 turns lock to lock and it has a huge amount of lock as well, and it is awesome to slide around.

With 4x4 though, especially in the wet, you can get some torque steer which can weight the steering up a bit, 2.4 turns could give your arms a bit of a workout in those conditions.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 12/9/05 at 04:04 PM Reply With Quote
I have a recon rack and it does just over 3 turns lock to lock, definitely not as much 3.5. It may not have as much lock as a new rack, I don't know but it is plenty quick enough for road use and I haven't needed to reverse and try again to get round a corner yet. My rack was £15+vat exchange so I don't think I'll swap it.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.