Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Wishbones/Brackets/Bushes
JC

posted on 27/7/05 at 05:57 PM Reply With Quote
Wishbones/Brackets/Bushes

I am building a locost inspired midi. For the front suspension, I am using Metro uprights with a fixed, tapered hole for the top mount. This means that castor/camber adjustment will have to be carried out at the inboard end. As I have been given some bearings with threaded tubes, i plan to use these. My questions are as follows:
1: Orientation - I have seen three versions - rose joints parallel to wishbone arms (easy to make, difficult to adjust?), joints at 90 degrees to car (camber by winding in/out, caster with washers/spacers) or 1 joint at 90 degrees to car, the other parallel so one adjusts camber, 1 does castor. I would appreciate opinions on which is correct/best.

2: In 'THE' book, the brackets are 3mm thick. In High sppeed low cost, the brackets are 16g (but bent to increase strength). Which is recommended? Do rose joint brackets 'clamp' the centre of the joint like a poly bush, or do they pivot about the mounting bolt.

3: Finally(!), I was planning to use rose joints on the top wishbone, poly bushes for the bottom. Will this cause problems?

Apologies for the multi-part post, look forward to the replies! JC

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
suparuss

posted on 27/7/05 at 06:27 PM Reply With Quote
persoanlly i would put them at 90 degrees to car just because it would be simpler to do the brackets. you could argue that the rose joints would be under less stress under braking if parralel to wishbone arms but in a midi the braking is less bias to the front as a front engine car and you can alway use bigger joints anyway. up to you i suppose.
the end of the rose joints are basically a bearing so wont make much difference if you clamp it or not, it will do the same job but is probably more stable if you do.
as for the brackets i would say 3mm would be a bit ott but 16g (about 1.5mm) is too thin, i wouldnt use less than 2mm myself unless as you say it has other support by bending etc.
cant see any real problem with using poly and rod ends either really although just rod ends at the top may make the ride quite harsh and having poly at the bottom may not counteract it, then depends what the car is used for i suppose. rod ends will give better feel (harsher ride) and bushes will give a better ride but less feel through the car.

russ.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 28/7/05 at 07:26 AM Reply With Quote
rose joints at 90 deg to the car, easier to adjust and less bending stress in the rose joint.

Brackets - 3mm. The weight is not much for the peace of mind if you hit a big pothole!

(the trailing arm brackets on the back of my grasser are 5mm and I've bent them slightly, ok I know trailing arm is a bit different but I didn't hit anything that hard!)

[Edited on 28/7/05 by NS Dev]

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.