Badger_McLetcher
|
| posted on 11/6/09 at 10:25 PM |
|
|
Locost Chassis +442 - NTDWM
Just spotted on the bay.
Linky
[Edited on 11/6/09 by Badger_McLetcher]
If disfunction is a function, then I must be some kind of genius.
|
|
|
|
|
craig1410
|
| posted on 11/6/09 at 10:33 PM |
|
|
It's surely got a few tubes missing at the front???
How disappointing would it be to spend all that time building a chassis to only get £74 (current bid) for it... 
Craig.
|
|
|
RichardK
|
| posted on 11/6/09 at 10:35 PM |
|
|
Doesn't look like my +442 especialy from the front end.
Rich
Gallery updated 11/01/2011
|
|
|
craig1410
|
| posted on 11/6/09 at 10:40 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by RichardK
Doesn't look like my +442 especialy from the front end.
Rich
Yeah, it's the weirdest and flimsiest front end I've seen in a while. My chassis is a McSorley 7+4 and it looks nothing like this...
|
|
|
LBMEFM
|
| posted on 12/6/09 at 06:05 AM |
|
|
Looks a bit dodgy to me
|
|
|
Peteff
|
| posted on 12/6/09 at 09:27 AM |
|
|
It's not a Locost chassis, I can't remember the name but it's one that has been available for a while something 24 seems vaguely
familiar.
yours, Pete
I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.
|
|
|
Daddylonglegs
|
| posted on 12/6/09 at 09:46 AM |
|
|
Certainly ain't nothing like the one I'm building from the same plans
Maybe I've read them wrong??
It looks like the Midget is winning at the moment......
|
|
|
l0rd
|
| posted on 12/6/09 at 10:23 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Daddylonglegs
Certainly ain't nothing like the one I'm building from the same plans
Maybe I've read them wrong??
I guess you did. You are supposed to start from the top downwards
|
|
|
Daddylonglegs
|
| posted on 12/6/09 at 11:38 AM |
|
|
??
It looks like the Midget is winning at the moment......
|
|
|
