rob126
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 03:13 PM |
|
|
rims
what size is the best? currnetly have a set of 13"s but im thinkin they r too small... can any1 post pics of a locost with 13" fitted.
thanks guys
first time building something this big!!
|
|
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 03:30 PM |
|
|
13s suit my purpose just fine (abusing it, not posing). Heres a pic 
 
Rescued attachment locost on 13s 001.JPG
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 03:31 PM |
|
|
 or more seriously
 
Rescued attachment locost on 13s 002.JPG
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
Mr G
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 03:49 PM |
|
|
what are you running on those wheelie bins Joel? I find that 6's give you better rolling speed but less manouvering accuracy
Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a
car that you are still paying for - in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes
and the car, and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it.
|
|
|
britishtrident
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 04:58 PM |
|
|
5.5Jx13" is the size for classic Seven look.
|
|
|
emsfactory
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 07:00 PM |
|
|
Ive got a set of 13" rs alloys, dont like them.
So I bought a set of 17" allesios with toyo proxes. They look the muts nuts. just have to make some new cycle wing brackets.
|
|
|
rob126
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 07:16 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
5.5Jx13" is the size for classic Seven look.
the rims i have, have 225/65/r13 tyres on them. dunno how wide 225 actually are.
first time building something this big!!
|
|
|
iank
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 07:36 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by rob126
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
5.5Jx13" is the size for classic Seven look.
the rims i have, have 225/65/r13 tyres on them. dunno how wide 225 actually are.
225 mm across the tread  rims from 6-8inch should work if I'm reading Yokohama's website right.
|
|
|
skydivepaul
|
| posted on 20/12/05 at 08:07 PM |
|
|
17's are not the best for good handling which is pretty much the point of having one of these cars. 15" should be the max you want to go
IMHO
http://www.smartideasuk.com
http://www.smartmapping.co.uk
HD CCTV
3D design solutions and integration
IP security systems
access control systems
|
|
|
emsfactory
|
| posted on 21/12/05 at 12:04 AM |
|
|
These cars handle so much better than pretty much everything anyway. i like my 17's, i think they look much better than the smaller ones.
Anyhow, I still have a set of the 13's to destroy when i'm in the mood.
|
|
|
emsfactory
|
| posted on 21/12/05 at 12:36 AM |
|
|
Also, the circumference of the tyres on the 17s are only very slightly more than the 13s
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 21/12/05 at 11:09 AM |
|
|
the usual arguments relate to sidewall flex, not rolling radius
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
iank
|
| posted on 21/12/05 at 04:44 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by JoelP
the usual arguments relate to sidewall flex, not rolling radius
And unsprung weight if you aren't using super-lightweight racing 17's.
|
|
|
