
What d'ya think?
1936 morris 8 hot rod ratrod v8 tvr powered 5ltr | eBay UK
Looks a right piece of crap. Don't get rats at all.
I like it.. a LOT!
quote:
Originally posted by Davegtst
Looks a right piece of crap. Don't get rats at all.
Interesting to look at but i wouldn't want to own one...Especially at eight and a half fahsand phands.
Really like that. It looks like a genuine proper hot rod/beater and not the sort of tacky trying-too-hard self-parody that a lot of these 'rat
rods' tend to look like.
Love it actually. Want!
Waste of a nice engine.
i like it
but , is rat the new word for chucked together
81/2k seems a bit steep
Quite like it but alot of money.
Love it!
yes yes yes yes
Not for me... btw how do "reworked jago chassis" and "correct v5c as 1936" tally? 
Have a look at the one in the latest issue of PPC.
quote:
Originally posted by nige
i like it
but , is rat the new word for chucked together
81/2k seems a bit steep
As i thought ..Bit like Marmite.....which I love BTW
quote:
Originally posted by Davegtst
Looks a right piece of crap. Don't get rats at all.
quote:
Originally posted by Liam
quote:
Originally posted by nige
i like it
but , is rat the new word for chucked together
81/2k seems a bit steep
It's an aesthetic style really - you'll most likely find the mechanical engineering underneath is spot on. Rat rods started almost as a protest against expensive, shiny never driven show hot-rods and was a throwback to the roots of hot-rodding, but the term rat-rod is to me more recently associated with cars that have massively exaggerated, tacky, blatantly fake patina, and stupid stick on tat like fake luggage etc etc. I think they look crap - like I said above sort of a self-parody. This on the other hand is really tastefully done and looks genuine - so perhaps it really should be called a 'beater' which is a traditional term for a 'locost' budget hot rod, or even just a traditional hot-rod, though the non-period engine probably rules that out technically. Having said that the style of this is certainly a deliberate aesthetic decision and nowt to do with lack of funding or desire to make it all shiny, so maybe rat-rod is right. Ah heck who cares - I like it![]()
[Edited on 8/7/11 by Liam]
Well what do they say about great minds?
. I must say I'm glad a near-american could understand my hot-rodese. I learnt it (and dragsterese)
from an ex colleague who's obsessed with rods and dragsters (and has both), but I wouldn't consider myself fluent
.
"agreed insurance valuation of £12500 via the NASC"
agreed by who Stevie wonder?
Liam,
I especially picked up on "shiny, never driven". There are vast numbers of enthusiasts over here (and maybe in the UK) where all that seems
to matter is paint and external finish..........on the speed channel (fairly decent, 75% car oriented TV channel) I'd say that 1/2 the ads are
for wax, polish car shampoo etc.
I like a nicely painted car as much as anyone, but to me it's very superficial (duh)...I like the engineering, styling, construction, novel ideas
etc. and find that the shiny paint is just a distraction.
Just my two penny worth..
Alan
I saw this one at a show in RAF Lakenheath in 2009.
It was an impressive piece of work, nicely put together under the grotty panels, but what really caught my attention were the scorch marks up each
door from the open exhausts!