franky
|
| posted on 26/11/11 at 04:03 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
You can't compare F1 with the cheap output like Cash in the Attic or Pointless , about 20 years ago the BBC quoted figure of
£500,000 pounds budget per episode for a top end TV detective drama even with new technology that will probably be nearer 1.5 million now. For
they danegeld the BBC pay for the rights and the feed the BBC get a lot of TV hours, the additional production costs could be slashed
drastically without affecting quality.
All the camera feeds are run by the F1 circus, the bbc only take 2 or 3 cameras of their own to each round.
How do you feel production costs could be slashed? Its the production that makes BBC f1 ok. The sky stuff should be much better. Should be!
|
|
|
|
|
Ninehigh
|
| posted on 26/11/11 at 04:14 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by TheGiantTribble
One wonders if the 'no adverts during the race' will prove to be tempory in the long run?
Don't see why not, it's not like the channel will be showing much else
|
|
|
franky
|
| posted on 26/11/11 at 04:19 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ninehigh
quote:
Originally posted by TheGiantTribble
One wonders if the 'no adverts during the race' will prove to be tempory in the long run?
Don't see why not, it's not like the channel will be showing much else
They don't do it with footy
|
|
|
designer
|
| posted on 26/11/11 at 06:28 PM |
|
|
quote:
the coverage etc will be very very comprehensive.
The show is too long now, today was full of dross, nothing else but dross.
|
|
|
