
Writen on a ipad at gatwick airport he he
I want one, very cool machines!!!! Had a play with one the other day. What do you think of it?
Some sort of sanitary product?
quote:
Originally posted by flak monkey
Some sort of sanitary product?
quote:
Originally posted by eddie99
I want one, very cool machines!!!! Had a play with one the other day. What do you think of it?
Meh. It's just a big iPhone or less if no 3g. As you said divisive amongst IT dudes. Macs are good for people who can only cope with one mouse button etc! Windows is no better.
quote:
Originally posted by hobbsy
Meh. It's just a big iPhone or less if no 3g. As you said divisive amongst IT dudes. Macs are good for people who can only cope with one mouse button etc! Windows is no better.
I'm aware the single mouse button comment is out of date but it was just bait. I've used an ipad and the plus points are the ui and touch screen but for 5 or £600 I think most people would be better off with a netbook irrespective of OS
quote:
Originally posted by hobbsy
I'm aware the single mouse button comment is out of date but it was just bait. I've used an ipad and the plus points are the ui and touch screen but for 5 or £600 I think most people would be better off with a netbook irrespective of OS
I dont like most apple products as they tend to be over priced and sell on gimmicks or trendyness.
Ipad is no different - why spend £500 on something that cant run more than one app at a time and wont support flash (due to Apples stubborness) which
is a big downside for web browsing if you ask me... Also no widescreen and a low res screen which makes it terrible for watching movies on
(apparently a selling point).
If they had done something about the above then I would have a much different opinion.
Sure it has some good points but its too big to carry around everywhere you go, so you might as well have a notebook - not as flashy but more
functionality in the same sized pakage.
[Edited on 6/6/10 by flak monkey]
Just a quick point, i watched an HD movie on one and the resolution was pretty great!
AND: Providing you stick to the apple main apps such as safari, you can multitask. Its just the bought in apps that are only one thing at a time
[Edited on 6/6/10 by eddie99]
Most of the iPad reviews/blogs I have read seem to have very weak justifications of the lack of flash and proper multitasking.
Apparently, in the same way that Firefox drove web developers to adhere to standards more closely, the iPad is going to single handedly stop web
developers from using Flash in future website designs. Despite that fact that virtually every mainstream browser supports it...
And denying the opportunity for users to enjoy the benefit of multitasking with third party applications apparently improves the users experience due
to longer battery life and "reduced confusion".
Sadly it seems that truly independent reviews not written by apple apologists are the exception. The iPad could be great, but I don't think it is
yet. Just like the iPhone, later adopters will likely get a better product, but unlike the phone you won't get a free/low cost one with a phone
contract. Meanwhile Android based products will undoubtedly be offering superior features for substantially less cost.
Id just get a macbook
@FlakMonkey: The iPad was expected to cost almost double what Apple are charging for it. The screen is an IPS TFT (basically the best type of TFT you
can get) and is absolutely fantastic to look at, especially for watching movies. A widescreen display is pretty rubbish for doing anything other than
watching movies - a poor compromise IMHO. As eddie99 has said, you can multi-task. Even on third party apps, the speed of switching between apps makes
it seem to multi-task. Speaking as a software developer, flash has had its day and was never very good. Time for a change and Apple (and Microsoft)
are helping that transition along. Hurray I say. Comparing it to the size of a notebook makes me wonder if you've actually held an iPad in your
hands. Have you? They are much smaller and lighter than a notebook (or even netbook) and yet are highly functional.
@eddie99: I agree with your comments about the screen. The resolution is 1024x768 so you can watch 720p movies which is better than DVD quality
(480p).
@MikeRJ: In practical use, you hardly notice the absence of flash support as many websites have already, or are soon to be converted, to other
technologies. Flash will fall by the wayside over the next few years IMO. As for multi-tasking, many of the reviews of Android based phones have noted
that "proper" multi-tasking kills battery life badly and have acknowledged that perhaps Apple were correct to be cautious in this area.
Apple are enhancing multi-tasking in iPhone OS4 which is released (probably) tomorrow and will follow for the iPad in the autumn. This will allow
iPhone OS developers like myself to register parts of the app to continue to run after the main app has quit. This helps to free up the memory and CPU
used by parts of the app which don't need to continue running (eg. display) while allowing the app to do stuff like wait for a Skype call or MSN
message. To my mind this is a much better solution that allowing developers to consume as much memory and CPU as they want for background tasks and
perhaps harm the user experience of the device as a whole. There are plenty of balanced reviews of the iPad out there if you look for them. Finally, I
would expect future iPad developments to be mainly software based and Apple have in the past been pretty good at upgrading original devices with newer
software so I fully expect my iPad will remain up to date until at least 12 months from now and quite possibly 24 months. After that I may be missing
some new hardware (eg. camera) but will probably be able to run most software.
Anyone who knows me knows that I am strong willed, not easily led and don't give a damn about being trendy. However, I do appreciate good design
and sound engineering and that is what Apple is producing these days. The fact that their products look good is a bonus. A bit like a Porsche 911
perhaps... 
Ahh thanks for reminding me. Apple are releasing the release date for the 4g iphone tomorrow 
quote:
Originally posted by eddie99
Ahh thanks for reminding me. Apple are releasing the release date for the 4g iphone tomorrow![]()
quote:
Originally posted by craig1410
I was going to upgrade but bought the iPad instead. Good decision I think.
quote:
Originally posted by hobbsy
quote:
Originally posted by craig1410
I was going to upgrade but bought the iPad instead. Good decision I think.
But what can you do on it that you can't do on an iphone or ipod touch at far less cost or on a proper laptop or netbook or mac book all at possibly less cost?
A nice UI but anything that is worth having (other than that which generates revenue in its own right like eBay) costs money. I can think of a bunch of "apps" on other platforms which are free.
Where is Racechrono for the iphone? Where is the obdspy type app which used a common £20 bluetooth dongle? Oh yeah there is one for the iphone but it uses a wifi dongle that costs ~£120 and the app is ~£20 as well.
Anyone wanna swap a 3gs iphone for a nexus one? I have an iphone, nice ui, ok for basic web browsing and emai etc (but so are most modern phones). Do I regret buying it... yes!
Also, if you have an iPad then you probably have a
"proper" laptop or desktop already - in fact you will need one to sync the iPad with! quote:
Originally posted by craig1410
Don't forget to compare based on similar memory capacities too. There is not much in it when you compare the costs properly. In fact, iPhone 3GS 32GB is £549 and the iPad 32GB Wifi + 3G is £599 (only £50 difference).
Sorry but I'm not going to compare an iPad with a netbook because there is no comparison.Also, if you have an iPad then you probably have a "proper" laptop or desktop already - in fact you will need one to sync the iPad with!
[Edited on 6/6/2010 by craig1410]
quote:
Originally posted by hobbsy
Yes you're right you've got to make comparisons based on memory capacities. Consider the fact that a 32GB iphone is ~£100 more than a 16GB iphone when most "open" competitors grace you with a microSD slot which means that upgrade would cost ~£20. Cheers for that Apple.
Oh my battery is a bit worn out, I'll replace it. Back to the manufacturer is it? Nice one.
Its not really the way forward is it. Just a license to print money on the strength of marketing and a n00b friendly UI.
Oh and you buy a £600 web device but you already have to have a "proper" computer to be able to make use of it? Eh? <£200 netbook at a third of the price that can do everything and more with a higher resolution (but minus a touch screen)
Still an Apple fan?
Gah.
[Edited on 6/6/10 by hobbsy]
No unpleasant turn intended, it's a pretty much
off topic thread so will stop here. I see the appeal of their kit but it doesn't seem like good value at times and some of their policies are
clearly money grabbing. I have kept equipment long enough to need new batteries and £55 is about 5 to 10x what it should cost really. The roof box
analogy really doesn't work in this context when all you're talking about is flash memory storage which is halves in price every year or so
and is taken advantage of by all users (eg digital cameras) except those with fixed non expandable devices with built in obsolence. I'm not
surprised their profits have overtaken microsoft.
I really don't mean to offend but some people don't realise these policies until it's too late.
I just did an engine swap, how's your build
going (last min attempt to stay in context of the forum!)
[Edited on 6/6/10 by hobbsy]
quote:
Originally posted by hobbsy
No unpleasant turn intended, it's a pretty much
off topic thread so will stop here. I see the appeal of their kit but it doesn't seem like good value at times and some of their policies are clearly money grabbing. I have kept equipment long enough to need new batteries and £55 is about 5 to 10x what it should cost really. The roof box analogy really doesn't work in this context when all you're talking about is flash memory storage which is halves in price every year or so and is taken advantage of by all users (eg digital cameras) except those with fixed non expandable devices with built in obsolence. I'm not surprised their profits have overtaken microsoft.
I really don't mean to offend but some people don't realise these policies until it's too late.
I just did an engine swap, how's your build
going (last min attempt to stay in context of the forum!)
[Edited on 6/6/10 by hobbsy]
2nd Coolest video: http://www.apple.com/iphone/design/#design-video
First being the IPAD version 
I don't really need or want a portabe computor so my opinion of the Ipad is irrelevent, but I do dislike the Iphone mostly because its not a
decent shape to use as a phone.
I currently have about 7 computors in the house, 4 of which a in a usable state of various makes and OS's and I personally think they're all
as bad as each other.
It would need to have bigger storage (32gb will be filled in a week, and I'm struggling to keep working space with the 110gb I have here), some
usb ports, if only one and a dvd slot.
Otherwise it's a little meh to me, just got a touch screen phone and I feel like a right technophobe prodding at it while it doesn't
respond.
well you can now get 32Gb micro SD & sony M2 cards so nokia N97 + SD = 64Gb 
I have been a Mac User for many years now and I wholly agree that Macs are more costly. THIS HOWEVER IS TOTALLY JUSTIFIED.
Just look at the Apple product that have been developed over the years that have be ground breaking, innovative and forward thinking. This research
and development costs money which is reflected in their products. I could list Apple ground breaking products but I would just list their entire
product range.
6 years ago I bought a 17in powerbook. Its 1 inch thick and made of titainium. The screen is perfect and the battery still last long enough for me
to watch a DVD. A quick walk to PC world to check out the competition and even 6 years later the PC community cannot compete with Apple on simple
consumer egonomics. Even big companies such as Sony and Dell can't compete. Dell in a stroke of so called genius offer laptops in a choice of
colours. I have a imac over ten years ago that had a choice of colours. Mine was 'Grape'. Thats just the design of the products
ergonomics let alone the forward thinking operating system. These Windows adverts at the moment (the 8 second lesson ones) irritate me. They are
pushing functions that Apple were using 10 years ago.
Take a look at the imac. Everyone has been a beautiful piece of craftsmenship and functionality.
To me cost of Apple products is more than justified. Just look at their products.
[Edited on 8/6/10 by Irony]
quote:
Originally posted by mcerd1
well you can now get 32Gb micro SD & sony M2 cards so nokia N97 + SD = 64Gb![]()
quote:
Originally posted by Irony
I have been a Mac User for many years now and I wholly agree that Macs are more costly. THIS HOWEVER IS TOTALLY JUSTIFIED.
Just look at the Apple product that have been developed over the years that have be ground breaking, innovative and forward thinking. This research and development costs money which is reflected in their products. I could list Apple ground breaking products but I would just list their entire product range.
6 years ago I bought a 17in powerbook. Its 1 inch thick and made of titainium. The screen is perfect and the battery still last long enough for me to watch a DVD. A quick walk to PC world to check out the competition and even 6 years later the PC community cannot compete with Apple on simple consumer egonomics.
Take a look at the imac. Everyone has been a beautiful piece of craftsmenship.
To me cost of Apple products is more than justified. Just look at there products.
Phew. I'm glad that's cleared up

Have you noticed how Iphones and Pads don't come with an instruction book? When I got a new Nokia 5800 about 18 months so ago it was meant to be
the next best media type phone. It came with a huge instruction book, and I never did get the email working properly.
My wife now has a Nokia 5800 and my god it looks like something from the dark ages compared to my iPhone.
The reason I love these products is that they just work, beautifully, straight out of the box, I had email set up on my iphone with no instruction
book in under 3 minutes ..... and as for the apps, there's just no comparison.
quote:
Originally posted by Irony
6 years ago I bought a 17in powerbook. Its 1 inch thick and made of titainium. The screen is perfect and the battery still last long enough for me to watch a DVD. A quick walk to PC world to check out the competition and even 6 years later the PC community cannot compete with Apple on simple consumer egonomics. Even big companies such as Sony and Dell can't compete.
quote:
Originally posted by IronyTake a look at the imac. Everyone has been a beautiful piece of craftsmenship and functionality.
^^^^?
Maybe the early ones but the current Imac's are far from slow machines, quicker than any other computer i've ever seen.
^^^
I guess that depend on what you've seen then
I think my i7 desktop would give most of the home user apples a good run for there money - I feel a chalange coming on
The problem I have with apples in general is they don't give you much of a choice or room for upgrades (I know this mean they can make them more
stable/reliable)
but it doesn't fit in well with my DIY / Locostbuilding way of thinking 
quote:
Originally posted by mcerd1
quote:
Originally posted by Irony
6 years ago I bought a 17in powerbook. Its 1 inch thick and made of titainium. The screen is perfect and the battery still last long enough for me to watch a DVD. A quick walk to PC world to check out the competition and even 6 years later the PC community cannot compete with Apple on simple consumer egonomics. Even big companies such as Sony and Dell can't compete.
fisrt off you won't find the best PC's in PC world - they sell mass market rubbish for the most part - I don't think you could ever call a dell cutting edge....
secondly sony laptops are rubbish - don't get me wrong, I've got loads of sony stuff that I love - but there PC's are a poor effort in my experience
quote:
Originally posted by IronyTake a look at the imac. Everyone has been a beautiful piece of craftsmenship and functionality.
even the first ones ?
they looked the part from a distance, but i reality were unbelivable slow basic machines that you couldn't get software for - just tarted up a bit in a coloured case - thats why I got my AMD K6-2 instead![]()
My biggest problem with Apple is all the ones I've had access to didn't run any programs apart from a very small selection that were
expensive.
I think it would be cool to fit an Ipad into a car and put all the controls for the sterio and other non esentials on it aswell as having it for
computor stuff when you want to.
I still say the Iphone is usless because it isn't the right shape to be a phone.
My guess for the next thing is some kind of washing machine.
Apple do appear to create almost a religious fervour around Jobs and product launches. The products are very clever (a little too clever?) but always
strike me as being form over function. I was involved in the Mac market, working on ISDN cards, back when they went from NuBus Macs to PCI Macs.
Quick questions for anyone with an iPad....How do you rename a document file ?
quote:
Originally posted by craig1410
Battery life on my iPhone is still excellent after 2 years of daily usage. If I want to fit a new one then I can buy one on eBay and fit it myself. Two screws and a connector!