Board logo

Referendum on EU membership
coozer - 2/11/10 at 06:16 PM

Right then, seems to hot in the media at the moment, and not a minute too soon IMO.

Lets have a referendum here on Europe, the EU in particular and how we would save £45m a day.....

Please post your feelings and thoughts.


blakep82 - 2/11/10 at 06:18 PM

would we save 45m a day by not being in the EU?!


coozer - 2/11/10 at 06:22 PM

quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
would we save 45m a day by not being in the EU?!


Of course, that's how much it cost us daily!


steve m - 2/11/10 at 06:29 PM

I say out,


Mark Allanson - 2/11/10 at 06:45 PM

£45m per day, 38m tax payers in Britain, thats £1.18 each. There are 3 tax payers in my household, thats £24.78 of our money going to build motorways in Turkey every week - nice.


designer - 2/11/10 at 06:47 PM

Trouble is, they have not started in Turkey YET!!

I saw Poland the year they joined, then two years after; what a change, and all paid for by us!!


scootz - 2/11/10 at 06:47 PM

I don't know enough about it to make judgement... look forward to reading the various views!


PSpirine - 2/11/10 at 06:54 PM

I vote in as I've got a Cypriot passport and would otherwise be evicted from here

You'd think with all those improvements in Poland their lorry drivers would learn to drive better than a blindfolded child.


handyandy - 2/11/10 at 07:01 PM

its about time we as a nation stopped "propping up" every other nation, who , i,m sure laugh at us behind our backs..IMO.

I say OUT.

cheers
andy


steve m - 2/11/10 at 07:01 PM

"I don't know enough about it to make judgement... look forward to reading the various views! "

What honesty,

Churchill wanted us to stay an island, and fought toothe and nail to remain so and while we are in the EU, we are not

Steve


Stott - 2/11/10 at 07:05 PM

quote:
Originally posted by handyandy
its about time we as a nation stopped "propping up" every other nation, who , i,m sure laugh at us behind our backs..IMO.



Here here, especially those damn cypriots................


joke

EDIt: I didn't vote as I don't know much about it either

[Edited on 2/11/10 by Stott]


tegwin - 2/11/10 at 07:06 PM

Am I right in thinking Switzerland are "part of the EU" without actually being tied to the financial rapage...

I think we need out... we need to focus back home more and get this country back on its feet!


Mark Allanson - 2/11/10 at 07:09 PM

Unfortunately the parasitic tendrils are probably too embedded in the ailing country for it to survive their removal.


cliftyhanger - 2/11/10 at 07:34 PM

Umm, just a thought. How much would we lose in trade if we left the EU?? Might have a bit of an effect? Easy to just look at what it costs us, and ignore what we gain. All rather difficult, but I suspect we would be stuffed. Remember we could easily lose our finance sector to another country, and that would be a disaster. plus the cost of imports would shoot up, and so on. This needs thinking through......


lotusmadandy - 2/11/10 at 07:40 PM

Out please..........

Andy


mcerd1 - 2/11/10 at 07:42 PM

quote:
Originally posted by tegwin
Am I right in thinking Switzerland are "part of the EU" without actually being tied to the financial rapage...!


thay are part of the 'free trade association' same as Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein

but not part of the 'economic area' (Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein are part of the EEA)



[Edited on 2/11/2010 by mcerd1]


plantman - 2/11/10 at 07:42 PM

Oooo I was goig to say that


mcerd1 - 2/11/10 at 07:45 PM

^^ yeah, but thats all I know without looking it up

[edit]
if you want to know more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Economic_Area

[Edited on 2/11/2010 by mcerd1]


slingshot2000 - 2/11/10 at 07:46 PM

quote:
Originally posted by handyandy
its about time we as a nation stopped "propping up" every other nation, who , i,m sure laugh at us behind our backs..IMO.

I say OUT.

cheers
andy


My thoughts exactly, BUT, lets not restrict it to the EU. I forget how much a year we give in aid to India, but how come they have just oredered 250 fighter jets from Russia. I am sure some of our defence contractors would have loved an order like that, especially after our Goverment has cancelled so many of our own. Remember companies like BAE and Rolls Royce make more money from the ongoing mantainance and parts contracts, than they do on the original sale.
Def out ! The sooner the better!


perksy - 2/11/10 at 08:04 PM

OUT

and Sooner rather than later aswell


BUT just like the last 'government' i doubt We'll get the chance to vote on it...


handyandy - 2/11/10 at 08:08 PM

quote:
Originally posted by slingshot2000
quote:
Originally posted by handyandy
its about time we as a nation stopped "propping up" every other nation, who , i,m sure laugh at us behind our backs..IMO.

I say OUT.

cheers
andy


My thoughts exactly, BUT, lets not restrict it to the EU. I forget how much a year we give in aid to India, but how come they have just oredered 250 fighter jets from Russia. I am sure some of our defence contractors would have loved an order like that, especially after our Goverment has cancelled so many of our own. Remember companies like BAE and Rolls Royce make more money from the ongoing mantainance and parts contracts, than they do on the original sale.
Def out ! The sooner the better!


I agree totally with your views, they basically merge with my own point of view, "laugh behind our backs".

On a personal note....I served in the Falklands war, ( & proud i did ), I wasn,t military, but was in the merchant navy, makes me wonder if the same situation arose again , what would we do? as we have slowly lost the Merchant Navy that this country once relied upon so much, for centuries.
I,ll climb down off my soap box

cheers
andy


hillbillyracer - 2/11/10 at 08:12 PM

quote:
Originally posted by cliftyhanger
Umm, just a thought. How much would we lose in trade if we left the EU?? Might have a bit of an effect? Easy to just look at what it costs us, and ignore what we gain. All rather difficult, but I suspect we would be stuffed. Remember we could easily lose our finance sector to another country, and that would be a disaster. plus the cost of imports would shoot up, and so on. This needs thinking through......



I'm inclined to agree, we're too close to Europe & too far from everywhere else (in physical geography rather than political) for us to be trying to make our own road. If we were to opt out would we or the rest of Europe suffer most?

On the other hand they do get an awful lot of our money! I suspect a lot of it ends up wasted or in the wrong pockets.

Ultimately I'm with Scootz, I dont know enough to make a proper judgement. Do any of us?


Daddylonglegs - 2/11/10 at 08:14 PM

Out, Out, Out!

Guess which crowd I stand in?

I never voted to be in the damn thing in the first place!


belgian2b - 2/11/10 at 08:14 PM

Hello,

i have been checking some numbers.

From 1986 to 2000, the netto cost of EU by citizen is -34 € in UK ( cost) when it is 575 € benefit in Irland per citizen.

When you know that the Queen and Charles do receive great cheques from common agricultural policy ( so the money you give to EU that is payed back), i don't think you have such a bad position.

Gerardo


femster87 - 2/11/10 at 08:21 PM

Lol, i'll stay out of this debate, not before i say getting out would def spell disaster, england owns nothing at the moment, pissing people off would def see the decline of the remaining service industries.

[Edited on 2/11/10 by femster87]


handyandy - 2/11/10 at 08:30 PM

This is an interesting topic as , if you look at the amount of votes on this thread
37 for
8 against
3 abstain
(currently as i type this post)

Given that the voters on this thread is a good mix of cultures/income etc etc & so a fair vote of the nation we live in,

The percentage is 75% for removing from the EU,
This in my opinion is why we are never allowed a referendum.......the goverment already knows how the vote would go, but wouldn,t act upon the decision voted by the population they are supposed to serve

cheers
andy


scootz - 2/11/10 at 08:41 PM

quote:
Originally posted by handyandy
The percentage is 75% for removing from the EU. This in my opinion is why we are never allowed a referendum.......the government already knows how the vote would go, but wouldn't act upon the decision voted by the population they are supposed to serve



Why do you suppose that is so though?


handyandy - 2/11/10 at 09:05 PM

quote:
Originally posted by scootz
quote:
Originally posted by handyandy
The percentage is 75% for removing from the EU. This in my opinion is why we are never allowed a referendum.......the government already knows how the vote would go, but wouldn't act upon the decision voted by the population they are supposed to serve



Why do you suppose that is so though?


Without trying to force feed my own political views on others,
IMO its due to that whichever goverment we have in power, they are too scared to "rock the boat" more so in the relationship with the USA, in which IMO we are just being used as a "fall guy" & follow them like a lost sheep at times.

No matter what manifesto,s political parties have in this country, it often makes me think that what they "allow" us to know of their intentions is purely "scratching the surface" of how they intend to govern our nation.

Each party always blames the previous goverment etc etc for the mess we find ourselves, and then the previous leaders are no longer held "accountable".

We,re running around in circles

cheers
andy


JoelP - 2/11/10 at 09:06 PM

media clout; we're all told to dislike the EU so we all do. I have no idea if we should or not, and 10 mins googling just confirms there's an awful lot more to it than meets the eye. The reality is that politicians probably know more about it than Joe Bloggs, and they seem to mostly favour it.

You could also argue that the anti EU politicians are just taking that stance to get public support.

Background reading would include a history of europe since the war, a degree in economics, and a passing knowledge of continental farming markets.


chrisxr2 - 2/11/10 at 10:59 PM

We should be like norway, not part of the EU, but part of the european economic area. All the benefits none of the costs.


RK - 3/11/10 at 12:25 AM

Do you remember a time when a guy called Wheeler, who lives in a very large estate in Chilham, Kent, was kicked out of the Conservative party for talking like this? Just asking.

Who will you get to do those unsightly jobs like construction labourer etc if you don't have access to the European market? What about those of you who like to holiday in Spain and France etc? Just things to consider.

Populist ideals are often very dangerous. We have a populist government here in Canada, and I highly recommend against it. The US is about to go that route too, as Obama is seen as too intelligent for the dimwitted average voter. Better to have dummies like Ray Gun and Bush Jr, where the real power people are behind the scenes, untouchable. But of course, I'm off topic, sorry.

I know full well I have no business commenting on your country, so don't take what I say too seriously!!

[Edited on 3/11/10 by RK]


gottabedone - 3/11/10 at 06:50 AM

...............but the government have as much if not more access to the public via the media than the EU haters do so why don't they tell us what good Europe is doing.. . . . if it's doing such a good job

Steve


martyn_16v - 3/11/10 at 08:39 AM

They do tell you, but the public tend to not believe much of what they say


whitestu - 3/11/10 at 08:51 AM

I was a strong supporter of the EU before the single currency, when it was mainly about free trade [1992, single market act etc].

The single currency was IMHO a case of those who want polirical union pulling a fast one. On the face of it a single currency sounds like an economic thing, but it is actually political because when combined with removal of market barriers it takes monetary and fiscal control away from national governments.

Like the current situation where Greece and Germany really need very different policies, but are tied to having the same. The only thing that can prop it up is transfer payments from the countries with succesful economies to the ones with weak economies - hence lots of money going from us to other coutries.

This is what hapopens within coutries where successful regions put in more in tax than unsuccessful regions, but as we are part of the same country we generally don't mind.

Stu


BenB - 3/11/10 at 09:14 AM

Yes, likes decide to blame the rest of Europe (in particular those dodgy Eastern European types). Let's pretend they're to blame for the financial pickle we're in and that it had nothing to do with us.

Oh no, hang on, this isn't 30s Germany. Sorry, please ignore the original statement, I must have been passively absorbing the knee-jerk Daily Mail xenophobic BS whilst wiping my arse with it.

The truth is we're so ingrained in the EU system that it makes it very difficult to work out a balanced answer to whether membership is positive or negative to this country. If we just look at the money going to the EU (as the DM would like) then we'ld be ignoring any possible benefits (which would clearly be ridiculous). I doubt one person on this forum (I certainly don't) has the detailed knowledge required of a complex and organic system to work out a cost/benefit analysis on membership of the EU. So in my book a referendum is a bad idea- it would be like letting a jury decide in a criminal case where the only evidence heard is the rantings of a rather rabid prosecution lawyer.


Jasper - 3/11/10 at 11:05 AM

quote:
Originally posted by tegwin
Am I right in thinking Switzerland are "part of the EU" without actually being tied to the financial rapage...

I think we need out... we need to focus back home more and get this country back on its feet!


No, they're not.

I have business dealing regualrly with the EU and being part of it definitely helps businesses in the UK and helps our economy generally. We are too small to be a strong independant country, we need them. Switzerland is a different story, they have huge banking influence and a very high standard of living - they don't need the EU.

If I had my way we'd have the Euro as well eventually.

I know this is not a popular opinion, but it's just too easy to say that the EU costs us a certain amount and we get nothing in return.


smart51 - 3/11/10 at 11:19 AM

The UK pays a lot of money to the EU but it spends a large amount of it here in the UK. The net contribution is quite small compared to Germany. The company I work for is almost entirely dependent on EU trade, as are many others. People don't realise what a lonley place the UK would be outside of the EU. We're only a small player in world affairs these days and its only that we're one of the big economies in the EU that we hang on to what remains of our political weight on the world stage.

Of cource the EU needs some reform. The Common Agricultural Policy and the wasteful second parliament are the two usual examples. The EU is a mixed blessing but I think the good outweighs the bad.

Don't believe all you read in the press. They exist to sell you paper, not a balanced opinon. Only bad news sells so that's what they give you. The EU is only useful to them as a bad news story.