i like the correct wording they use:

"and absence of pollution at the point of use"

a small but important point! pollutants are still produced in the powerstation which powers the splitting of the water.

great idea.

an alternative to the smart possibley

The chocolate teapot and dehydrated water. What's it cost, can anybody afford one and what are they going to run it on? If I could fill it up out of the tap (faucet) where are the government going to get their revenue?