well? any guesses?
Who cares?
true enough! humour me, for curiosities sake...
Guilty of what?
a) Kiddy fiddling.
b) Music murdering.
c) Mass market coruption.
d) Plastic surgery disaster.
e) Advertising Pepsi.
plastic surgery? never...
quote:
Originally posted by JoelP
plastic surgery? never...
Guilty of being total devoid of the reality that exists out side his own little world.
If people are close enough to waco jacko to have their kids invited by him than they surely must have know of his alledged
"tendency's"(not sure if this is proper English) towards children.
As a precaution and if i had kids i never would allow them to stay with a person like waco jacko only if it was to avoid possible problems
futurewise.
It only takes a few words to start a whole media offensive.
I remember the case of a girl in Holland where she "confessed" at school i believe it was,that she was abused by here father.
The poor man ended in hell,and his family as well,just to discover that the whole thing was a matter of bad communication and improper police
investigation.
When there's possibly money involved than things are very sensitive.
I dont like waco jacko but one has to be very carefull with media controlled court cases.
Don't know if he's guilty or not, but I don't believe it's possible for him to receive a fair trial. I also think he was shafted
from day one with the family (parents in particular) he grew up in. IMHO
Nick
lets face it!! anyone who wants to look like the child catcher from chitty chitty bang bang must be odd ...sex case ....HANG HIM or just put him in general population...
Personally I feel Jacko should be free to marry Camila and the hunting of hiers to the throne with packs of foxes should be legalised.
Jacko will be fine, he's using OJ Simpsons lawyer...
quote:
Originally posted by marcyboy
or just put him in general population...
I didn't poll on this survey.
He is surely innocent until proven guilty. Anyone who leaves their children with someone they don't really know is IMHO ignoring their parental
responsibilities.
Considering how the defendant allegedly grew up - it is typical of the 'ignorance' or otherwise, of the parents involved. Despite the
elaborate lifestyle, strange attitude of self-worth and odd behaviour - it's possibly the last person I'd leave my precious children with -
but not because of his reputation - it speaks for itself.
The prosecutioners are parasites, however you want to put it.
quote:
Originally posted by clbarclay
quote:
Originally posted by marcyboy
or just put him in general population...
As apposed to what, put him in a young affenders institute?
quote:
Originally posted by Cita
Who cares?
i am waiting for the first bit of evidence that he actually did something - and not just the words of someone that would stand to gain money from
it.
monica lewinsky had her dress. if something happend would the kids underwear or something not be A1 evidence?
jackson is a screwed up person cos he had a weird and isolated childhood, and now has a weird and isolated adulthood. people fall over backwards for
him cos they want to have his favour and money. no one, i guess, has ever told him to stop being a twat and be normal.
if he really was a kiddy groper, why did the kid look so happy with him on the bashir documentary? why did it take so long for him to complain? why
did he then decide, on the back of the documentary furore, to then shout foul? surely not cos of the opportunity? And in that case, why didnt he get
'monica style' evidence.
Why have no others of the zillion kids that went to his place not also complained of assault?
something is weird here.
also take into account that the us justice system had its prosecutors re-elected by the public. what a way to get your name up there.
wether or not he is guilty, i dont think that the trial can be fair - too many reasons for people to want his guilt so they can sue for gain
atb
steve
[Edited on 5/3/05 by stephen_gusterson]
I dunno what's wrong with me but i agree with Gusto here
I'd just like to say if I was a Billionare kiddy toucher I would have a THEME PARK in my back garden !!!!............. funny he only seems to
share his bed with little boys never little girls and says he loves children??
if you want to be more specific, none of them seem to be white either...... the kid making the accusations is hispanic or something, isnt he?
atb
steve
[Edited on 7/3/05 by stephen_gusterson]
So only boys and only non caucasian children, even if he's not a fiddler, he could still be racist and sexist.
male and brown but not necessarily human
it might explain his rendition of i'm forever blowing bubbles,
quote:
Originally posted by clbarclay
So only boys and only non caucasian children, even if he's not a fiddler, he could still be racist and sexist.
He's a 46 year old man that sleep's with little boy's if that was happening in your street I'm sure you would wonder what was
going on ......... it's not normal behaviour !!!!
I agree with most of what Steve has said...and dont have anything to add...just thought i would say i agree...
David 
PS: Just for the record I dont like Michael Jackson. I think he is a weirdo and very strange. AFAIK theres no evidence pointing to guilty....so
innocent it is until the verdict. Then if it comes through guilty with no conclusive evidence i would say it was a fix of some kind...
I'm just waiting for it to be thrown out/deemed inconclusive, or stopped through the unfair trial/too much media route that often happens with
these high profile cases.
[Edited on 8/3/05 by flak monkey]
quote:
Originally posted by woodster
He's a 46 year old man that sleep's with little boy's if that was happening in your street I'm sure you would wonder what was going on ......... it's not normal behaviour !!!!
well said stevefair point
there doesn't seem to be anything concrete but all is not right with jacko. i'm not sure he is a kiddy groper but one thing is for sure he won't get a fair trial and i cant see his career surviving this, excuse the pun but no one is going to touch him after this, even if he does get off