Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Beam Bending
liam.mccaffrey

posted on 6/10/05 at 03:55 PM Reply With Quote
Beam Bending

I have a deflected cantilever and I need to know the amplitude of the oscillations when it is released.

I know that if there is no energy loss then it will be twice the initial deflection. This beam is damped though isn't it? I.E the oscillations will decay

anyone have any thoughts?





Build Blog
Build Photo Album

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ned

posted on 6/10/05 at 04:00 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by liam.mccaffrey
anyone have any thoughts?

make mine a double, it may come to me





beware, I've got yellow skin

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
donut

posted on 6/10/05 at 04:07 PM Reply With Quote
quote:

deflected cantilever, amplitude, oscillations when it is released.



What the Dickens are you on about

-moves hand over head in swoosh motion-







Andy

When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/andywest1/

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
DaveFJ

posted on 6/10/05 at 04:13 PM Reply With Quote
Ahh yes

was contemplating the oscillations of my bendy beam just last night.......

there was quite an energy loss and my beam was definately damped though..

[Edited on 6/10/05 by DaveFJ]





Dave

"In Support of Help the Heroes" - Always

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
mookaloid

posted on 6/10/05 at 04:21 PM Reply With Quote
You're twanging your ruler on the edge of your desk aren't you?

I had a formula for this from my university days. Bu**ered if I can remember what it was though

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 6/10/05 at 04:21 PM Reply With Quote
A serious post...

Can you model it as a second order system? (Ie mass, spring, damper).

The formula being:
F = M (d^2t/dt^2) + B(dx/dt) + kx

Where M = mass, B = damping coefficient, k = spring constant, x = displacement, F = force...

Use the transfer function to find out the natural frequency and damping factor.

You would need to know a fair bit about the system, but if you could do some experiments to get some numbers, you can work out all the coefficients (natural frequency, damping factor etc) by working backwards.

Its all to do with system dynamics. I am sure you could find something on the net about second order systems.

Try the trusty google...

David

[Edited on 6/10/05 by flak monkey]





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
zilspeed

posted on 6/10/05 at 04:43 PM Reply With Quote
I gave up on mechanics when they asked me to believe in CM4 i.e centimetres to the 4th

I can understand CM, can believe in CM2, I can even get CM3.

CM4 is taking it too far though. I gave up after that. I refuse to believe in things I can't picture.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Cita

posted on 6/10/05 at 05:00 PM Reply With Quote
quote:


The formula being:
F = M (d^2t/dt^2) + B(dx/dt) + kx

Where M = mass, B = damping coefficient, k = spring constant, x = displacement, F = force...



Oh that,just a piece of cake...if I can find the cake

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
liam.mccaffrey

posted on 6/10/05 at 05:17 PM Reply With Quote
flack

The problem I have is that the system obviously loses energy though damping. But I can't do any experiments its not practical not sure how to get the damping coeff. or the spring constant. Is there an straightforward way of calculating K and B from dimensional data, beam is a tube by the way

I have already calculated the deflection and max stress

I was thinking about using an energy method given that I have calculated the above stuff. What do you think?





Build Blog
Build Photo Album

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Triton

posted on 6/10/05 at 05:46 PM Reply With Quote
Over my head and back again that one





My Daughter has taken over production of the damn fine Triton race seats and her contact email is emmatrs@live.co.uk.

www.tritonraceseats.com

www.hairyhedgehog.com

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
steve_gus

posted on 6/10/05 at 06:36 PM Reply With Quote
thats pretty heavy stuff for a red haired muppet!

atb

steve





http://www.locostbuilder.co.uk

Just knock off the 's'!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
dnmalc

posted on 6/10/05 at 07:06 PM Reply With Quote
If you cant do the simple experiments then I would suggest that you get a CAE package with modal analysis material data and you should be able to set up a simple mesh that will determin the natural frequency and hence the damping.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dnmalc

posted on 6/10/05 at 07:06 PM Reply With Quote
If you cant do the simple experiments then I would suggest that you get a CAE package with modal analysis material data and you should be able to set up a simple mesh that will determin the natural frequency and hence the damping.

[Edited on 6-10-05 by dnmalc]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 6/10/05 at 08:32 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by dnmalc
If you cant do the simple experiments then I would suggest that you get a CAE package with modal analysis material data and you should be able to set up a simple mesh that will determin the natural frequency and hence the damping.


Last thing you should do if you can't do the basics -- FEM is dangerous in the wrong hands.

[Edited on 6/10/05 by britishtrident]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 6/10/05 at 08:41 PM Reply With Quote
The initial amplitude must be somewhere between the initial delflection and twice the initial delflection -- as it won't have much damping somewhere between 1.6 and 1.9 times the initial deflection won't be far out.

[Edited on 6/10/05 by britishtrident]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
liam.mccaffrey

posted on 6/10/05 at 10:39 PM Reply With Quote
i agree BT thats what i thought, I don't think there is an easy way to do this is there?

Many thanks for the help guys!

And all the sarky comments





Build Blog
Build Photo Album

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 7/10/05 at 07:26 AM Reply With Quote
no easy way out I'm afraid, no.

If you want some really mind boggling answers to stuff like this you need the eng tips forum - Eng Tips

but still doesn't get around the fact that what you are trying to do is actually quite complex to do in any detail.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Coose

posted on 7/10/05 at 03:14 PM Reply With Quote
I think you'd need to apply Hookes Law, therefore you'll need to know the Young's Modulus of the material which will entail calculating stress and strain.

Stress = force to produce extension of the bar/cross sectional area of the bar.
Strain = total elongation of bar/length of bar.

Youngs modulus = stress/strain.

Hookes law = (stress x length of bar)/(cross sectional area of bar x Young's Modulus).

I can't be bothered to type any more, so look here instead....

http://www.ntmdt.ru/SPM-Techniques/Basics/2_SFM/text184.html





Spin 'er off Well...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 7/10/05 at 03:25 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Coose
I think you'd need to apply Hookes Law, therefore you'll need to know the Young's Modulus of the material which will entail calculating stress and strain.

Stress = force to produce extension of the bar/cross sectional area of the bar.
Strain = total elongation of bar/length of bar.

Youngs modulus = stress/strain.

Hookes law = (stress x length of bar)/(cross sectional area of bar x Young's Modulus).

I can't be bothered to type any more, so look here instead....

http://www.ntmdt.ru/SPM-Techniques/Basics/2_SFM/text184.html


Sorry....but it is much more complex than Hookes law. You need to apply the system equation that I mentioned, which includes hookes law, but adds in the effect of damping from air resistance etc, along with the effect of the mass of the object dynamically. Then by using the transfer function you can apply some real coefficients to the equation if you can do some experiments. Otherwise, its just an estimate.

David





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
clbarclay

posted on 7/10/05 at 10:31 PM Reply With Quote
Beam Bending

From my distant past I seem to remember that:-

The angle of the dangle equals the throb of the knob if the lust renains constant.

Hope that is of some use.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
liam.mccaffrey

posted on 8/10/05 at 11:54 AM Reply With Quote
I found in a old text book a table giving % amplitude decreases per cycle which i used to give an estimate. It turns out though that we didn't need to do it. What we have to work out now is more complex but is possible considering the info we have. Thanks for all your help guys! (especially Flakmonkey)

This little community has a hell of a lot of knowledge

Thanks again





Build Blog
Build Photo Album

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Coose

posted on 10/10/05 at 08:00 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by flak monkey
quote:
Originally posted by Coose
I think you'd need to apply Hookes Law, therefore you'll need to know the Young's Modulus of the material which will entail calculating stress and strain.

Stress = force to produce extension of the bar/cross sectional area of the bar.
Strain = total elongation of bar/length of bar.

Youngs modulus = stress/strain.

Hookes law = (stress x length of bar)/(cross sectional area of bar x Young's Modulus).

I can't be bothered to type any more, so look here instead....

http://www.ntmdt.ru/SPM-Techniques/Basics/2_SFM/text184.html


Sorry....but it is much more complex than Hookes law. You need to apply the system equation that I mentioned, which includes hookes law, but adds in the effect of damping from air resistance etc, along with the effect of the mass of the object dynamically. Then by using the transfer function you can apply some real coefficients to the equation if you can do some experiments. Otherwise, its just an estimate.

David


You're correct, and I was building up to it by giving the calcs for Hookes Law and then I was going to move on but lost interest..... Hence giving the link!

I always think it's best to source these things yourself and then you get more of an understanding....





Spin 'er off Well...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.