Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Yet another take on the locost theme
zilspeed

posted on 21/1/06 at 05:07 PM Reply With Quote
Yet another take on the locost theme

First I've heard of this one - Link to sale on ebay

As it says in the best exam papers, discuss......

Especially the L frame area (not that there is one on this).
The seemingly complete dearth of triangulation about the horizontal axis (lozenging, anyone ?)
And the interesting wishbone design.

[Edited on 21/1/06 by zilspeed]






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
andyharding

posted on 21/1/06 at 05:11 PM Reply With Quote
Wouldn't trust that chassis myself....





Are you a Mac user or a retard?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
cossey
Contributor






Posts 430
Registered 5/12/05
Location Kent
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: a pile of bits that will someday be a fisher fury

posted on 21/1/06 at 05:14 PM Reply With Quote
i wouldnt sit in that unless it was securely tethered down. it looks like it would split straight down the middle in a front impact.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Marcus

posted on 21/1/06 at 05:23 PM Reply With Quote
I'm not normally one to criticise........
BUT the reason I didn't buy a Caterham (ok money aside) was that, having driven one, I found that pixie boots were required to work the pedals, even with my small size 8s.
Just look at the width of the footwells in that!! Where do you even fit the pedals?
you could mount a V8 up the trans. tunnel

Marcus

Seems to have a big boot though

[Edited on 21/1/06 by Marcus]





Marcus


Because kits are for girls!!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
SeaBass

posted on 21/1/06 at 05:56 PM Reply With Quote
"All CCT7 chassis and suspension parts go though our very strict quailty control" - shame the ad wording doesn't.

The chassis seems to be modified from the book for no great reason... My concerns would be...

* Width without bracing especially at rear wishbones mounts under hard braking.
* Strange top wishbone configuration in very thin round tube.
* No photos of rear chassis config, but I suspect not strong enough for wishbone mounts...

Compare this with my pics from Autosport of the Caterham SV chassis...




Full Gallery Here






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
zilspeed

posted on 21/1/06 at 06:09 PM Reply With Quote
Indeed - the Caterham is a proper birdcage. (With apologies to the Maserati brothers).






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
indykid

posted on 21/1/06 at 06:24 PM Reply With Quote
any ideas what lower bj's it takes? the wishones top and bottom look suspect, and as for the rear upright, it looks like a rough version of the mk one.

the rear of the caterham chassis is engineering porn!

i'm not convinced about the ebay one though
tom






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
rusty nuts

posted on 21/1/06 at 07:08 PM Reply With Quote
The top wishbone mushroom looks rusty?
supposed to be aluminium

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.