MikeR
|
| posted on 13/11/06 at 08:54 PM |
|
|
bike engines - 3 engines = 420hp ish over 280hp and about what, 80kg heavier?
yeah ok, probably not worth it but it would be cool and you'd have a certain something over all those people with twin engine setups - one more
engine 
|
|
|
|
|
NS Dev
|
| posted on 13/11/06 at 09:13 PM |
|
|
against the rules now though anyway!!!
Engine is 65kg 140hp
Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion
retro car restoration and tuning
|
|
|
MikeR
|
| posted on 13/11/06 at 09:30 PM |
|
|
pah - put a large box over it and claim its an traction control unit, when its used you get less traction
|
|
|
akumabito
|
| posted on 13/11/06 at 09:42 PM |
|
|
hmm, so you can have 2 engines but not 3? That's odd.. well, couldn't you join engines together? If you'd have 4 engines, and join
'm together two by two, would it not count as having 2 engines? (560 Hp would be pretty sweet!)
|
|
|
MikeR
|
| posted on 13/11/06 at 09:46 PM |
|
|
would seem sweet but having watched someone try to control a 600hp v8 in a BMW mini shell - its too much.
Funny to watch but not very fast.
|
|
|
NS Dev
|
| posted on 13/11/06 at 10:29 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by MikeR
pah - put a large box over it and claim its an traction control unit, when its used you get less traction
Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion
retro car restoration and tuning
|
|
|
NS Dev
|
| posted on 17/11/06 at 11:38 AM |
|
|
just inspiring myself with a quick glance at a class 7 grasser or two to keep the ideas coming............
how awesome does this mini look!!!
Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion
retro car restoration and tuning
|
|
|
