Hellfire
|
 posted on 25/2/05 at 11:26 PM |
|
|
Solidworks 2005
Ok... where do I start?
|
|
|
|
|
chunkielad
|
| posted on 25/2/05 at 11:38 PM |
|
|
In the garage building instead!!!
|
|
|
Tralfaz
|
| posted on 26/2/05 at 12:20 AM |
|
|
Lucky Sod,
Where did you get that? Is it a University issue?
B
|
|
|
Liam
|
| posted on 26/2/05 at 12:25 AM |
|
|
quote:
Where did you get that? Is it a University issue?
Huh i 'll bet 
Online tutorials (under help menu). there's loads of them. You'll learn all you need to know to get started.
Liam
|
|
|
RogerM
|
| posted on 26/2/05 at 08:47 AM |
|
|
Solidworks is one of the easiest CAD packages to pick up.
As with any 3D model package it is worth thinking how you would make the part before drawing. I usually find that doing a basic shape and then
removing 'material' to give the best results as adding bits here and there can lead to a bit of a mess if your not careful. Just think of
it as if you are initially creating a fordged / moulded blank and the maching to finished state.
For chassis stuff, spaceframes etc, It is best to draw each tube as a single item and then build an assembly of one side. You can then duplicate that
assembly to give the other side. Adding the cross rails will then give you a chassis assembly with minimal hastle.
If you are intending on using the function built in for weight and loading predictions it is advisable to put the material properties in before you
even draw the first line on any particular model.
The only thing I will say is that when you go from the model to the drawing using "radid-draw" isn't the best way. The auto
dimension placing usually comes out very odd!!!!
Have fun, just remember although it has some powerful features there is still no substitute for working methodically and planning things out before
picking up a mouse.
I have models of many of the components either finished or in rough state, give me a shout if you want them ..... well I have to do something at work
don't I!!!!!
Rog
|
|
|
Mad Dave
|
| posted on 26/2/05 at 09:38 AM |
|
|
Might see you at MK this morning, we can have a chat there.
Regards
Dave
|
|
|
Hellfire
|
| posted on 26/2/05 at 02:00 PM |
|
|
Thanks for those replies chaps, I am pretty proficient at picking some things up. I made a set of 1" extended TRE extensions last night complete
with external threads. Cant get the tapping to work though for some reason. I have a machinist waiting for a drawing...
[Edited on 26-2-05 by Hellfire]
|
|
|
flak monkey
|
| posted on 26/2/05 at 02:12 PM |
|
|
Having not used solidworks for a while... im not sure if tapping actually shows up on the model when you do it, but if you make a 2d drawing of the
model it shows up then...or maybe i was just imagining that...
David
Sera
http://www.motosera.com
|
|
|
RogerM
|
| posted on 26/2/05 at 09:23 PM |
|
|
Threads are a pig.
Cosmetic threads don't shoe in models, use the hole callout notation on the drawing and all will be fine.
External threads are best done with a helix and tooth form pierced and extrudded around (removing material works best. Get the Zues book out for the
thread details. The Toolbox threads for metric aren't correct!!!! Imperial ones are though, damn the Yanks!!
|
|
|
Hellfire
|
| posted on 27/2/05 at 11:28 AM |
|
|
Most of the threads I will use are mostly in my head anyway regarding depth flat's radii etc...
|
|
|
