Board logo

Carlton gearbox vs type 9
Steve Lovelock - 30/5/06 at 06:15 PM

I am thinking of a Carlton gearbox to mate to a Vauxhall 16V instead of the usual type 9 route taken by most people. I understand that it is lighter but want to know:

How do the gear ratios compare?
How do the they compare for strength?
Any other challenges?

Cheers


ned - 30/5/06 at 07:14 PM

nsdev will tell you but i gather they suffer from lack of upgrade bits that are readily available for the type 9 and do eventually break (so i'm told)

Ned.


russbost - 30/5/06 at 09:54 PM

If it doesn't break in a Carlton it's hardly going to in a locost unless you're planning on permanent burnouts!


NS Dev - 31/5/06 at 07:41 AM

Having had some experience on this one........

The carlton box is "similar" in terms of strength to the type 9, certainly not weaker. I have broken a similar number of both boxes.

Broke 3 carlton/manta ones in a 16v manta, but as was pointed out, the locost is a lot lighter so should be no problem in that.

The carlton box is a much better design than the type 9 but NO upgrade bits are available, even service bits are tricky, if something breaks in it you really need another one.

To sum up, in a locost, if you are going to compete then go for the type 9 so you can upgrade. For road use it matters not which one you pick.


Steve Lovelock - 31/5/06 at 09:13 AM

It is actually an Omega box if that makes any difference?

How easy will it be to fabricate the gear leaver set up?


NS Dev - 31/5/06 at 10:02 AM

depends what fabrication facilities you have, but it's not a problem, basically a carrier bolted to the back of the 'box with a spherical bearing in it to hold the lever, and a clevis arrangement on the bottom of the lever with a link rod to the shifter coupling.

not something to worry about at all, I'm sure I or somebody else on here can help if there's a problem.

omega box is no prob