
anyone using one? or not locost enough.
Or is rear drive the problem for mating to a gearbox.
I would have thought a flat 4 or 6 in the front would do wongers for CoG but then what do I know...... 
The 6 cylinder boxers are probably too wide for a 7.
Possible for a middy with gearbox mods to turn them round the 'proper' way (straightforward allegedly).
Turning the engine round might make them rotate the wrong way for a normal FWD gearbox, but I'm not sure which way they rotate so I
couldn't be sure - someone will be along soon to let us all know 
flat 6 porsche engines cost a FORTUNE!!
trust me I have looked for a long time at using one in the back of a grasser!
Ideal engine but £3000 for a fairly crap one is too much money!
A Subaru engine with turbo.....
quote:
Originally posted by iank
Turning the engine round might make them rotate the wrong way for a normal FWD gearbox, but I'm not sure which way they rotate so I couldn't be sure - someone will be along soon to let us all know![]()

Probably missing the point here but a 944 Turbo develops 250 horse power and is front engine with transaxle. How about that for weight distribution.
Although I used to own one I have no idea whether the bits would go into a Locost but they are a reasonable price (well the non turbo ones are
anyway)
John
There's a fellow bulding a 7 using 924 running gear on the US Locost Builder's site. I have a 944 myself, and wwould have thought the
engines to be too high, but then they are leaned over a fair bit in the original car, so it might fit. As far as the transaxle is concerned, it also
contains the IRS, so that is something else taken care of. However, they are designe to use a "torque tube" to join the engine and
transaxle together solidly, with a driveshaft running inside it - that would have to be engineered. But, it has been done!!

The 924 2.0 engine is basically the VW LT28 engine, I would have thought there would be a strong possibility that the LT gearbox could be adapted to fit (or may just fit without mods)