Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: k series questions.
paul_mcq

posted on 19/10/05 at 02:14 PM Reply With Quote
k series questions.

hows it going i'm hoping some one on here will be able to help me out, i'v been given a challnage to build a fast 1.1 car, i have a rover 1.1 8v, i no you can fit the 16v head on but the valves come down to much for the pistons, would changing the crank and the conds from a 1.4 into mine will this allow clearnce between piston and valve???? any other help and tuning info on k series would be great. later
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ditchlewis

posted on 19/10/05 at 03:02 PM Reply With Quote
I would have thought that that would increase the capacity of the engine?

Prehaps a cam profile with reduced lift would be the answer?

what do others think?

Ditch






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 19/10/05 at 03:09 PM Reply With Quote
1.4 is simply a long stroke version of the 1.1 the bore size is the same.
Fitting a 1.4 crank into a 1.1 will turn it into a 1.4.

With the true removeable liner version introduced in the mid 90s the blocks of all the 4 cylinder k series 1.1 to 1.8 were identical.


However it may be possible to machine 1.1 K8 pistons to clear the k16 valves.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 19/10/05 at 03:28 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
1.4 is simply a long stroke version of the 1.1 the bore size is the same.



Are you sure?
I thought 1120 K series was 58.0x76.2, 1400 was 75x79

http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?enginekseriesf.htm

If true the twin cam head will be very unlikely to ever fit the 1120.

Never seen anyone try tuning a 1120 since as britishtrident says the blocks are identical size, so everyone just gets a bigger engine from the breakers and screws it in as their first tuning stage.

Otherwise a decent exhaust manifold, airfilter, exhaust (ditch the cat), bike carbs/injectors + manifold and a reprogrammable ECU are all I can think of, and it will never be cost effective for the bhp gain.

Oh and ditchlewis, shrink that bl**dy avatar it takes up 1/3 of the screen! [beat me to it )

[Edited on 19/10/05 by iank]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
smart51

posted on 19/10/05 at 09:31 PM Reply With Quote
Why not fit a bike engine. that would make it a fast 1.1
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.