Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Alfa 2.0 engine
Johnmor

posted on 15/1/06 at 11:10 AM Reply With Quote
Alfa Engines

When I tried to defend the Alfa engine I was realy comparing it to the Pinto or early Ford DOHC, if faced with the choice of a Zetec or Toyota then it becomes more difficult. One thing we should consider, is the cost of tuning an engine to aquire the desired power and response. As previously mentioned Alfas rust, big time , so the mechanical parts become very cheap. Eg 1991 Alfa 164 2.0l 8v Twin spark £100 .(entire car) That provides 150 Bhp as it comes, with reliability of mass production, Fuel injection, and standard parts.
How much would it cost to develop 150bhp from a DOHC?
As we said gearbox and transmission is a problem but if the conversion to a Type 9 or T5 is carried out at even £500, then that has to be balanced against the cost of tuning a DOHC.
The front whell drive Alfas have shoter sumps than the rear whell drive and are now far more common. That may aleviate some of the sump depth problem.
The 16v engine has reliability issues , the clearence from valve to piston is so low that small end wear can result in contact, so i would avoid that particular version.

I have to hold my hands up and say I bought a pre built chassis (dam he noticed), I have always messed with engines, and expierence has taught me that if get engine selection, tuning or maintenence wrong then I will be left at the side of the road.
If I get chassis construction wrong getting stranded or wet may be the least of my problems.
I am at the moment try to fit an Alfa V6 in my chassis and trying to mate the engine to a type 9 so I reserve the right retract everything I have said in a month or two.


View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
owelly

posted on 15/1/06 at 03:44 PM Reply With Quote
My Alfa V6 is in and running.
It sounds marvellous but I still need to fit the chimneys!!





http://www.ppcmag.co.uk

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Johnmor

posted on 15/1/06 at 06:40 PM Reply With Quote
V6

Thats great news.

How did you get on with the clutch, which friction plate did you use?

That is going to be a seriously quick machine!!!!


View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
JB
Senior Builder






Posts 436
Registered 20/5/04
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: Built: V8 Kitten, 2 litre Lada, Space frame Minor,

posted on 15/1/06 at 07:54 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by alfaman
JB
Its interesting to know that the later alfa 16v twin spark engines went back to alloy blocks
are these the engines used in alfa 156,s and 147,s and do you reckon they mate onto the front wheel drive fiat/lancia gearboxes
(integrale,thema,tipo,croma etc.)?

I am unsure of the exact details, but a guy I knew with a 16V Fiat engine in his Minor mentioned it to me. I have contacts in Austrailia who will also probally know.

I would expect the block to bolt upto any of the Fiat gearboxes.

More research is required!

John

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Bob C

posted on 15/1/06 at 09:18 PM Reply With Quote
I used a 1750 version of this engine (from the 1750 berlinetta saloon) in a home made lotus elan (of all things). I thought the engine was great at the time - certainly very different from the cast iron boat anchors from BL, ford & vauxhall. The construction was a novelty, wet liner cylinders slipped into a big aluminium bucket with 'o' ring seals round the bottom. The sump was a big finned al casting with a labyrinth of baffles cast in the inside. The cylinder head was hemisheric & you could see right through from intake out of exhaust during top overlap. Cam pulleys were full vernier & the exhaust valves sodium filled(!). The box that came with that car was one of the first 5speeds available to joe public with a step-up 5th.
OK it leaked oil & I could never get the valve shims right & you had to pull the camshafts right off to adjust 'em & once I got the intake cam a tooth out & bent 4 valves...
but it went alright & sounded good!
Bob

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
dnmalc

posted on 15/1/06 at 09:53 PM Reply With Quote
What have I started??
Yes the Alpha will strtch my talents but given that I am already building the chassis, scuttle panels and bones from scratch the Alpha may mean another year on the build. Given my lack of experience with any alpha compared with a reasonable knowledge of fords and the fact that £500 spent on the pinto in the garage (ie cam, 45s, exhaust and vernier pulley) will give me 150 bhp with only an engine build I think the answer is clear.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Johnmor

posted on 15/1/06 at 11:12 PM Reply With Quote
Alfa Engines

I have to agree with everything you say, If you have little or no expieence with alfa or Fiat/lancia engines then Ford is the way to go,as you say, its what you know.

The best way to look at these engines is as an alternative , not better or worse but different ( diversity training yeugh##)

The best way to stir up opinion is to slag of somebody elses pride and joy, thats why I check this site every night,

Alfas are still the dogs bol##cks though!!!!


View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.