Poll: Which Engine [View Results]
VAG 1.8 Turbo
Zetec 1.6 SE
Ford ST150 (Duratec)
Ford ST170 (Zetec)
Vauxhall 16v
Rover 16v
Toyota 4Age
Mazda
Any other



Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Which Engine
dave1888

posted on 6/12/08 at 03:53 PM Reply With Quote
Which Engine

Thinking of next years project and trying to decide on which engine would be a good choice.
Looking for Lightness, Power and Pysical size. Please feel free to add your own choice.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mr henderson

posted on 6/12/08 at 03:58 PM Reply With Quote
My inclination would be to decide how much power you need,t hen choose the lightest engine that could provide that.

For instance, I wouldn't choose the 1.8T if I only needed 180bhp, because it's quite chunky.

On the the other hand, I would choose it if I wanted 300bhp because it would probably be the cheapest and lightest way of achieving that kind of power

John






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
tomgregory2000

posted on 6/12/08 at 04:04 PM Reply With Quote
my vote went towards the vag 20v turbo, its an amazing engine and soooo easy to get more power from and very flexable, you can pootle round doing 1500rpm and then give it some and its a rocket ship, and not much turbo lag with the K04 turbo fitted, not a nice looking engine though!

[Edited on 6/12/08 by tomgregory2000]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coozer

posted on 6/12/08 at 04:30 PM Reply With Quote
Rover T16 if you can get a good rwd install, otherwise Ford Duratec/Mazda MX5 set up??





1972 V8 Jago

1980 Z750

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
scootz

posted on 6/12/08 at 04:52 PM Reply With Quote
Had I stuck with the Caterham, then I would definitely have finished the RX8 engine and 6-speed box conversion!

Light, physically tiny, revvy... and 240bhp!

Bit of a guddle getting all the parts together but entirely achievable!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
f1ngers

posted on 6/12/08 at 05:10 PM Reply With Quote
My vote goes to the vag 20v turbo. I drive an old (P reg) Audi A4 Turbo Sport which has been 'chipped' taking it from 150 to 180 BHP and I grin everytime I drive it. I love this engine with 40+ mpg on a run and great performance.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ivan

posted on 6/12/08 at 05:16 PM Reply With Quote
My vote is a Volvo T4 or T5






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
rost

posted on 6/12/08 at 05:59 PM Reply With Quote
Definately a T5 volvo, its about the same size as an VAG 1.8T!


Weighs in about 170kg including oil, power steering and aircon pumps.
Its about 62cm high, including the filler cap which can be lowered. Its 65cm long, front to back flywheel. Not sure about the width, cause mine lacks a turbo for the moment, but i'm told its about 55cm

[Edited on 6/12/08 by rost]

[Edited on 6/12/08 by rost]





Charlie don't surf!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
austin man

posted on 6/12/08 at 07:29 PM Reply With Quote
Ive got the 1.8 turbo where it should be in a Golf. it would definitely be a good cchoice the K04's turbo is the model yo want 300 BHP can be extracted 210 bhp is possible with just a remap as this is the same engine in the Audi TT. The audi's and Skodas and SEAT with this engine push 180 up to 220 I believe, whereas the VW range is limited to 150 unless you get the 180 limited edition model. there are several engine models after 2001 they are Dive by wire and easilly mappable via the OBD ports.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Volvorsport

posted on 6/12/08 at 08:05 PM Reply With Quote
dont know if i should join in - but theres been two mighty fine suggestions .





www.dbsmotorsport.co.uk
getting dirty under a bus

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
twybrow

posted on 6/12/08 at 08:11 PM Reply With Quote
I'm sorry, but I've gotta say.... If you are looking for 'lightness, power and physical size' then how can you ignore bike engines?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mark Allanson

posted on 6/12/08 at 08:43 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by twybrow
I'm sorry, but I've gotta say.... If you are looking for 'lightness, power and physical size' then how can you ignore bike engines?


BSA Bantam 125 anyone?





If you can keep you head, whilst all others around you are losing theirs, you are not fully aware of the situation

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Antnicuk

posted on 6/12/08 at 09:54 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by scootz


Light, physically tiny, revvy... and 240bhp!

Bit of a guddle getting all the parts together but entirely achievable!


i ticked Mazda assuming of course you are talking rotary. It is definitely achievable!

and the next best thing to a BEC without the unnecessary noise and silly rpm at 70mph. 2200 rpm at 70mph and 330 ftlbs ........ for now...

[Edited on 6-12-08 by Antnicuk]





600 BHP per ton, Stylus Brought back from the dead! Turbo Rotary Powered!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.