Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Top hose / bottom hose
Richard Quinn

posted on 24/8/09 at 02:21 PM Reply With Quote
Top hose / bottom hose

Most, if not all, cars that I have come across take hot water to the rad via the "top hose" and cooled water back to the water pump via the "bottom hose". Why is it this way round and why not the other? Maybe it is in some cars but I haven't seen any as yet.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
tomgregory2000

posted on 24/8/09 at 02:24 PM Reply With Quote
heat rises
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Project7

posted on 24/8/09 at 02:26 PM Reply With Quote
Because physics says that the cooler water will be at the bottom.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega0684

posted on 24/8/09 at 02:37 PM Reply With Quote
and you would have to pump the water upwards against gravity, using up more of the engines created engine = less horses at the wheels!
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 24/8/09 at 02:56 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by omega0684
and you would have to pump the water upwards against gravity, using up more of the engines created engine = less horses at the wheels!


In a closed system pressure at the pump inlet will only be a little lower than at it's outlet, so gravity won't have much effect. Just like a central heating pump, it would never be able to pump water up one or two floors unless it had the pressure of the returning water at it's inlet.

The reason is that water will naturally circulate upwards through the engine and downwards through the radiator due to the thermosyphon effect; hot water has a lower density than cold water so will rise to the top of a system if allowed to do so. Similarly the water being cooled in the radiator falls to the bottom as it's density increases. This gives you a natural flow of water which the pump assists.

It could be connected the other way around, but the pump would be fighting the thermosyphon action

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BenB

posted on 24/8/09 at 03:10 PM Reply With Quote
Some early engines didn't have pumps at all and just relied on thermosiphon..... (as expertly described above!!).
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mark Allanson

posted on 24/8/09 at 03:24 PM Reply With Quote
The main reason is that if the coolant level falls a little, the top hose would only suck air.





If you can keep you head, whilst all others around you are losing theirs, you are not fully aware of the situation

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 24/8/09 at 06:04 PM Reply With Quote
A very very few recent engines have tried to do it the other way round for emission control and fuel efficiency reasons --- here be dragons.





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.