Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Wideband Lambda positioning
Madinventions

posted on 24/12/09 at 01:05 AM Reply With Quote
Wideband Lambda positioning

Here's an early pic of my exhaust layout on my Mojo.



The current engine is a Zetec SE 1242cc with a mighty 75bhp and I'm gathering the parts to change this to a 1600 Zetec SE with GSXR600 TBs and a Megasquirt. I've got a Techedge wideband lambda sensor on the way to help with the tuning of the MS but the instructions for the WB kit states that the sensor should be a fair way down the exhaust to prevent overheating issues and as you can see in the pic the boss for the Ford narrowband sensor is right at the top of the manifold, with the cat bolted directly beneath it.

So, one option is to blank off the Ford boss and fit a new one further down the pipe and mount the WB sensor after the cat. I know this will affect the readings, but by how much?

The only other alternative that I can see is to replace the entire exhaust system from manifold to tailpipe and use a silencer with an internal cat. I've priced this up at around £530 so I'd like to avoid this if at all possible, although the more I think about it, the more I feel it's the best course of action. Not very Locost though...

Anyone got any bright ideas?

Cheers,
Ed.

PS: I hope Santa brings me a welder...

PPS: The Mojo is currently registered and on the road so IVA will not be an issue, although the MOT in 2 years might be as the car is on an age related P plate so will need the cat test.


[Edited on 24/12/09 by Madinventions]





Mojo build diary: http://www.madinventions.co.uk

Solo music project: Syrrenfor http://www.reverbnation.com/syrrenfor

View my band website:
http://www.shadowlight.org.uk

http://www.eastangliankitcars.co.uk/

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
prawnabie

posted on 24/12/09 at 01:26 AM Reply With Quote
I would think it needs to be before the cat?

All the sensors I have seen after the cat give a pretty steady reading until somet is a miss.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
turbodisplay

posted on 24/12/09 at 08:45 AM Reply With Quote
First i would say you could try to place where it is, the boss temp (thread) cannot exceed 500C(ish), actual sensor 750C.
Never fit after cat!
option 2 make or get made a threaded spacer so sensor is not in exhaust stream, will slow response but not by much.

Spacer will have fins to act as a radiator to disipate heat. Prob need to relocate sensor by 15- 20mm.
Darren

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
brianthemagical

posted on 24/12/09 at 10:27 AM Reply With Quote
Will you not hsve a differnt exhaust with the new engine? Or is it the same setup. One poss is to make a nice tubular setup, sans cat, for day to day use and then fit the cat system for MOT time. Can;t take more than 2 mins to swap them with so much space.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
fatbaldbloke

posted on 24/12/09 at 10:28 AM Reply With Quote
As I recall the Innovate wide band sensor kit comes with details of a heat shroud to protect the sensor. It's like a cone that fits instead of the washer that usually goes between the sensor and the boss. It's a bit like the collar you fit to a cat or dog to stop it scratching its ears.
I don't know if you can buy one ready made or have to make it. I'll see if I can find the paperwork over the christmas break and post a picture.



[Edited on 24/12/09 by fatbaldbloke]

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Brommers

posted on 24/12/09 at 01:09 PM Reply With Quote
I can't really see any sensible option other than getting new headers made up with a cat further down the exhaust system. Mind you, if you're changing the engine to get more power, and swapping to ITBs, then using a cast iron manifold seems a bit counter-intuitive since I can't imagine it'll do anything for the engine's power output. Probably worth the cash given the increase in power you'll get from a decent exhaust.
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Madinventions

posted on 24/12/09 at 01:29 PM Reply With Quote
Wow, thanks for all your advice guys!

I've found the details of the Innovate copper heatsink (basically a 100mm square copper washer) and found that they also do these bung extenders (£60 each...)


Other extenders seem to be available so I think I'll do some Googling over Christmas. There does seem to be quite some debate about how much venturi effect a bung extender would cause, but I expect that this is mostly conjecture.

The new engine will have a different manifold to allow for the larger exhaust ports, but it's still a cast iron lump. There were a few 1600 Zetecs that had a tubular exhaust manifold that might work, and I'm also playing with the idea of using one of these with an inline cat such as those from a Rover 400 series.

Ed.





Mojo build diary: http://www.madinventions.co.uk

Solo music project: Syrrenfor http://www.reverbnation.com/syrrenfor

View my band website:
http://www.shadowlight.org.uk

http://www.eastangliankitcars.co.uk/

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
sebastiaan

posted on 24/12/09 at 02:57 PM Reply With Quote
Just stick it in the manifold; it's also there in the OEM setup and the sensor should be up to the job.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 24/12/09 at 03:41 PM Reply With Quote
Only one thing is certain, you can't fit it after the cat and expect it to give useful results!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
fatbaldbloke

posted on 25/12/09 at 11:31 AM Reply With Quote
quote:

Just stick it in the manifold; it's also there in the OEM setup and the sensor should be up to the job



Remember that the OEM sensor is a narrowband lambda sensor and a considerably less sophisticated piece of kit than a wide band sensor, so likely to be less sensitive to the ambient conditions.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
sebastiaan

posted on 25/12/09 at 06:27 PM Reply With Quote
Yes, but have a look at where the widebands are in their OEM application; same place as a narrowband would be.

The often used LSU 4.9 is OK up to 930 deg C operation temp and 1030 deg C max.

See here: http://www.bosch-motorsport.com/pdf/sensors/lambda/LSU49.pdf

From that PDF: "Install at a point where the gas is as hot as possible."

Without exceeding above stated temperatures of course... On a 1.6 zetec SE you'll be OK when mounted in the manifold as per OEM.

[Edited on 25/12/09 by sebastiaan]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
sebastiaan

posted on 25/12/09 at 06:33 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by sebastiaan
Yes, but have a look at where the widebands are in their OEM application; same place as a narrowband would be.

The often used LSU 4.9 is OK up to 930 deg C operation temp and 1030 deg C max.

See here: http://www.bosch-motorsport.com/pdf/sensors/lambda/LSU49.pdf

From that PDF: "Install at a point where the gas is as hot as possible."

Without exceeding above stated temperatures of course... On a 1.6 zetec SE you'll be OK when mounted in the manifold as per OEM.

And

[Edited on 25/12/09 by sebastiaan]
this document agrees.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.