Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Bike Engine - Solid Mount...Why not Rubber Mount
TIMHICKS1983

posted on 2/4/11 at 09:45 AM Reply With Quote
Bike Engine - Solid Mount...Why not Rubber Mount

I have put a bike engine in a Smart project, solid mounted. I wish to design a rubber engine mounted project so vibration is cut down and all parts have less shock on them.

Why do so many if not everyone solid mount their bike engines to the car?

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 2/4/11 at 09:54 AM Reply With Quote
Mines on rubber, no need to mount on rubbers as bike engines are just so sweet and smooth, also hard mount adds rigidity to the frame as it becomes a stressed member.

Regards Mark

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
designer

posted on 2/4/11 at 10:02 AM Reply With Quote
Most bike engines should be solid mounted, but if you want a bit of flex, use metalastic bushes.
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
TIMHICKS1983

posted on 2/4/11 at 10:07 AM Reply With Quote
Its more for the loss of vibration and noise, and smoother transmission, which I am aiming for
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 2/4/11 at 10:26 AM Reply With Quote
Mines on metalastic bushes. Pretty stiff ones so no movement but less vibration transmission.





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
matt_gsxr

posted on 2/4/11 at 10:48 AM Reply With Quote
I get a fair amount of vibration from being solid mounted, but I like it!


Flexible mounts add complexity, which is why I didn't bother. But no reason why you shouldn't do it.-

Matt

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
matt_gsxr

posted on 2/4/11 at 10:48 AM Reply With Quote
I get a fair amount of vibration from being solid mounted, but I like it!


Flexible mounts add complexity, which is why I didn't bother. But no reason why you shouldn't do it.-

Matt

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 2/4/11 at 10:51 AM Reply With Quote
So much vibration his fingers are still shaking and pressed the post button twice!





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
daniel mason

posted on 2/4/11 at 11:21 AM Reply With Quote
LOL ^^^






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
TIMHICKS1983

posted on 2/4/11 at 11:35 AM Reply With Quote
Will crack on and design a new kit will rubber mounts
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
40inches

posted on 2/4/11 at 12:23 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by mark chandler
Mines on rubber, no need to mount on rubbers as bike engines are just so sweet and smooth, also hard mount adds rigidity to the frame as it becomes a stressed member.

Regards Mark

+1

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
daviep

posted on 2/4/11 at 01:52 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by designer
Most bike engines should be solid mounted, but if you want a bit of flex, use metalastic bushes.


Is there any theory to back this up or is it just a post which tells us absolutley nothing?





“A truly great library contains something in it to offend everyone.”

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.