Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 20/3/05 at 08:58 PM |
|
|
Type 9 source!
I have bought a remanufactured type 9 from a guy in Wales. He was a bit vague where he bought it but said that he bought it from a kit car builder in
or around the Swindon area who builds using 2.0 Zetecs and Type 9's. I am trying to find out the source so that I can find out what spec the box
is i.e ratios and bearings without having to remove the cover. Plan to fit it to an ST170 engine so will need heavy duty bearings etc. Anyone any
ideas?
ta!
|
|
|
|
|
James
|
| posted on 20/3/05 at 09:01 PM |
|
|
I'm guessing but could you not work out the ratios by turning the input that (while in each gear) and counting the turns of the output shaft?
HTH,
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The fight is won or lost far away from witnesses, behind the lines, in the gym and out there on the road, long before I dance under those lights."
- Muhammad Ali
|
|
|
Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 20/3/05 at 09:05 PM |
|
|
Yes I see what you mean! Trouble is I still won't know if I am going to kill the box in the first thrash down the road. When I get a quick shift
or something I'll start counting!
thks
|
|
|
clbarclay
|
| posted on 20/3/05 at 11:02 PM |
|
|
Whats wrong with removing the gearbox cover?
Whalst your checking what its got in it, you can check for and damaged or worn parts. You could even change the gearbox oil whalst your at it.
|
|
|
NS Dev
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 08:20 AM |
|
|
and if you take the bellhousing off you will know if it is a heavy duty type 9 or not, the heavy duty 'box has a boss on the outside of the
front of the casing, to house larger layshaft bearings, the std type 9 just has the layshaft flush with the front of the casing.
|
|
|
Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 08:21 AM |
|
|
I am being a bit lazy and to be honest the ratios are not a problem but not sure how I can identify if it has heavy duty bearings. The gearbox is
un-used since being rebuilt / remanufactured and it hasn't yet got oil in it. I was hoping to find out where it came so that I can call them.
Thanks
|
|
|
Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 08:23 AM |
|
|
Thanks! If I post a picture later today can you give me your opinion?
|
|
|
Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 02:07 PM |
|
|
Picture of front of gearbox!
|
|
|
NS Dev
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 02:19 PM |
|
|
Not quite I'm afraid! Can you takle the pic at a bit of an angle to one side of the front of the 'box? The boss I am on about is under the
input shaft on your pic!
If there is a boss there, it's heavy duty. If there is just a 3/4" shaft flush with the end of the casing, it's not.
|
|
|
Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 02:22 PM |
|
|
I'll have another go tonight but I don't think there is a boss there from memory.
Thanks
|
|
|
Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 10:19 PM |
|
|
Looks like a visit to BGH for me then! There is no protruding boss under the input shaft.
Thanks for all your help.
Dave B.
|
|
|
greggors84
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 10:34 PM |
|
|
Wont the standard type 9 take the power and torque from the ST170? I was under the impression they could take more than that.
Chris
The Magnificent 7!
|
|
|
Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 10:49 PM |
|
|
Looking at some of the threads running in the past I think the max bhp for a standard box is about 145 - 150. I was told also that with a 3.62 lsd
first gear on a standard ratio box is a bit short. Any further advice will be gratefully received.
|
|
|
stephen_gusterson
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 11:39 PM |
|
|
what type 9 was fitted to the V6 granadas?
the box was used on V6 granadas coped with 150hp ....
are not all type 9 ratios basically the same, with the final drive being decided by the diff?
atb
steve
[Edited on 21/3/05 by stephen_gusterson]
|
|
|
MikeR
|
| posted on 21/3/05 at 11:47 PM |
|
|
they are similar but as NS Dev said the heavy duty box as fitted to the v6 can handle more power, it also has slightly different ratio's with a
marginally better first gear (.3 different) the downside is the longer input shaft which needs a spacer on the bellhousing to fit the standard clutch.
You can get round it but the spacer is the easiest / best option (cutting the splines down an inch with an angle grinder just doesn't seen right
somehow)
|
|
|
NS Dev
|
| posted on 22/3/05 at 09:20 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by greggors84
Wont the standard type 9 take the power and torque from the ST170? I was under the impression they could take more than that.
It all depends on the weight of the car it's in and the way it's driven. I broke 3 std type 9's in quick succession behind a 200hp
vauxhall XE in a rally car, but then I know of somebody using a std box in a very light westy behind basically the same engine who has no problem over
a year's worth of track days!
I would say it will be very marginal, and to do it right, speak to Brian Hill Geartech, best to get it right I think.
|
|
|
Dave Bailey
|
| posted on 22/3/05 at 12:51 PM |
|
|
Thanks for all the help and advice......
A phone call and a fat wallet needed I think!
|
|
|
