Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Injection manifold
macnab

posted on 9/1/07 at 09:22 AM Reply With Quote
Injection manifold

Maybe someone out there will know this...

Does the EFI manifold fit directly onto the 2.8 Cologne v6. I have a semi mechanical injection system from the capri and was wondering if I could ditch this and fit the more modern system. Also to be honest if it can be done I haven't a scooby what would be involved in getting it running.

Can anyone help???






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
macnab

posted on 9/1/07 at 11:20 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks Mark,

Hmm, right the underlining reason that I'm asking is that the plenum chamber used for the MFI system is a huge ali box that when fitted does a very good job of blocking my view. Add on top of that a scoop to make it smooth and SVA friendly and I end up with a monster bulge on my bonnet. Not good.

Looking at the later EFI system it has a much lower profile but I don't know whether that system is fitted to the Cologne or the Essex v6. I had considered making a glassfiber manifold with full trumpets and twin chambers either side of the engine but it’s a complex moulding on the very limits of my ability plus it would take some time to construct.

The megasquirt system would work just great I'm sure but still does not get round the real problem of the huge chamber.

It looks like I'm going to have to do some research into this before jumping in.

Thanks for the help, I'm sure I'll be asking your advice again very soon.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
macnab

posted on 9/1/07 at 12:04 PM Reply With Quote
Ok cheers, let me have a look at the manifold and check to see if one can be cut down. I suspect the injection one would work best. Infact I could bring them with me to the meet at the end of the month.

Out of curiosity what's an approximate cost off such a system?

u2u me if you want on that...

cheers, scott.


[Edited on 9/1/07 by macnab]






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mcerd1

posted on 9/1/07 at 12:32 PM Reply With Quote
Heres what Burtons have to say about them:

quote:
In the following text, we are only concerning ourselves with the two larger types of V6 engines, although tuning principles remain the same for all sizes of engine. Although slightly less in capacity than the Essex V6, these engines are lighter and more powerful (150bhp) but have less torque or grunt than the Essex. Basically, the 2.9 unit is a longer stroke version of the 2.8, but there are also other subtle differences between these two engines, which makes any interchange of parts very difficult. The 2.8 cylinder head has a 2 port siamese exhaust manifold design as against the more conventional (and better) 3 port design on the 2.9. Like the Essex engine, the 2.8 V6 had the same type of cam drive gear design and the same associated problems. The 2.9 has a much more reliable chain drive for the camshaft. The 2.8 engine can be tuned to a reasonable level (modified cam, staged heads, steel cam gear, etc.) but the poor cylinder head design is its ultimate restricting feature. The American version of this engine was fitted with 3 port heads but such items can be difficult to source in the UK. For those wishing to convert their 2.8s into 2.9s be warned, it is not easy and it is not cheap. Because of the different exhaust porting the camshaft phasing is different (they also rotate in opposite directions to each other). The 2.9 distributor, oil pump and drive shaft will also be required. The differences in the chain and gear drives means that, if you fit the 2.9 crank in the 2.8 engine, the front nose will require modifying. And because of the longer stroke crank, the pistons will protrude approximately 1.5mm above the deck face. The piston crowns can be machined down but this will affect their ultimate strength, especially if the compression ratio is to be raised.



With the 2.8, the con rods are the weak link. HD ARP con rod bolts are essential for over 6000 rpm. A con rod that has been stress relieved and shot peened can rev safely to 6500 rpm. An electronic rev limiter is a must have to prevent the consequences of over-revving. Carburettor engines can get good performance using either the 38DGAS or 40DFI5 and, for the more serious, conversions have been seen using a 4 barrel Holley carb. The inlet manifold on the MFi K-Jetronic injection engine is a serious restriction. The four ‘risers’ basically do not allow for sufficient airflow. Unfortunately there is not enough wall thickness to allow these to be opened out, so the only way to solve this is to build up the outsides with welding. With the risers sufficiently opened out, we have seen instant increases of approx. 15bhp.


BTW if you want a 2.9 - I've got one (in a car just now and would need rebuilt)

[Edited on 9/1/07 by mcerd1]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
macnab

posted on 9/1/07 at 01:03 PM Reply With Quote
Cheers mcerd1

Thanks for the offer of the 2.9 but my engine is only recently rebuilt and in prime condition that's the reason I'm happy to try and get the most out of it.

Their right about the injection manifold being too restrictive. Rather daft as there's loads of room to have made them bigger, maybe someone got their sums wrong.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mcerd1

posted on 9/1/07 at 03:47 PM Reply With Quote
turning a 2.8 into a 2.9 could be hard work and expencive

but would it be easier to use the slightly better 2.9 heads on a 2.8 ? - what would this involve ?

[Edited on 9/1/07 by mcerd1]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 9/1/07 at 03:47 PM Reply With Quote
2.9 inlet, as far as I know, doesn't fit the 2.8i'm afraid. I think they are very similar, but not actually the same! I have one of each lying about somewhere, will have a look.

If you are struggling for height and want injection, have you thought about getting a 2.3 or 2.8 single carb manifold (quite common on granada 2.3 and 2.8 non injection models) and just fitting a USA sourced single point injection throttle body to it? Certainly cheap enough.

Just an idea!





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 9/1/07 at 03:53 PM Reply With Quote
.........one of these items is what I am on about, would take up the same space as the std carb and you could put a K&N filter over it just like over the std v6 carb.








Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.