Board logo

Brake efforts from IVA
Slimy38 - 24/3/26 at 08:39 AM

For those that have gone through IVA, does anyone know what their brake efforts were? I need to improve my brake efforts but I'm not sure what I have available.

For reference, mine were as follows;

Axle 1 134 194
Axle 2 91 96

That gives me a total of 515kg braking effort. For my new design weights I need to find 570kg of effort, but I am wondering whether that sort of effort is possible. If I could just get axle 1 NS up to the same as OS that would suffice, I'm not sure how to do that though.

My braking system is basically stock MX5 NA, with the brake booster deleted.

I have found one post about braking results from Skov's test fail, the numbers are very similar but I can't find any info on what he did to resolve it, and he's not been on here for the last 8 years (I think he sold his car a long time ago).


JAG - 24/3/26 at 12:00 PM

I did my SVA back in 2005, so I forget how the brake test works.

What do the numbers represent? Are those numbers when the wheel locks?

IF it's when the wheels lock then the only thing you can do is fit stickier or better tyres.

IF it's at a particular brake pedal effort then you can change the pedal ratio or the master cylinder bore size.


JAG - 24/3/26 at 12:39 PM

IVA Manual Brake Test
IVA Manual Brake Test


Brake Test
Brake Test


So it looks like the Tester will depress the brake pedal until brake force hits a maximum, and stops increasing while the wheel rotates OR until the wheel locks. Wheel lock is much more likely!

But the interesting bit is that they compare the forces to a minimum target of 60% of the cars weight: CLW or DGW whichever is the highest.

Now I don't know what those weights are but if you're about to change weights then it would be worth making sure the brake numbers you already have are 60% of the new weight

[Edited on 24/3/26 by JAG]


Slimy38 - 24/3/26 at 02:49 PM

Stickier tyres did cross my mind, the numbers on the front are when the wheels slid on the rollers. It was a wet day which probably didn't help, but I suspect the amount of water actually on the tyres didn't make a huge difference. The tyres were also overinflated to help with self centering, now they're back to normal pressures I think maybe there's a bit more cross section actually touching the rollers?

I had to change my weights because my design weight was lower than the calculated. I've gone for recommended numbers but they put me over the limit for braking effort.


gremlin1234 - 24/3/26 at 03:34 PM

the old way of getting better braking after a car has been off the road; was always to drive it hard, and brake hard, (itallian tune up but for the brakes)
I also remember taking my underused tin-top for an mot and noticing the brakes were better after the test, as they had applied them much harder than I ever do.


jacko - 24/3/26 at 08:33 PM

Are the pads new if so make sure they are bedded in
G


Slimy38 - 24/3/26 at 09:02 PM

quote:
Originally posted by jacko
Are the pads new if so make sure they are bedded in
G


They are now, so yeah I'll spend a bit of time on the way down to Bristol bedding them in.


ianhurley20 - 25/3/26 at 02:58 PM

You seem to have an imbalance on your front axle which is similar to what I had initially. I adjusted the corner weights and brought the front axle to the same values. This was 2016 at IVA, the tester went away for a few minutes 'to do some calculations (the bake testing machine had also recored axle weights) and came back saying all was well. Mine was Ford Sierra front and rear brakes with MX5 master cylinder and servo with the rear axle pressure limiter fitted. Don't have any results recorded now I'm afraid


nick205 - 25/3/26 at 04:30 PM

Many moons ago, I SVA'd an MK Indy, which used the donor Sierra's braking system (discs front and drums rear with a pressure limiter from a Fiat for the rear).

Front end - all new discs and pads
Rear end - donor drums and new shoes

No issues/comments at SVA.

You had to push hard when braking, but then I'd always driven cars with servos.


Slimy38 - 25/3/26 at 04:44 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ianhurley20
You seem to have an imbalance on your front axle which is similar to what I had initially. I adjusted the corner weights and brought the front axle to the same values. This was 2016 at IVA, the tester went away for a few minutes 'to do some calculations (the bake testing machine had also recored axle weights) and came back saying all was well. Mine was Ford Sierra front and rear brakes with MX5 master cylinder and servo with the rear axle pressure limiter fitted. Don't have any results recorded now I'm afraid


Ah you might be on to something there. I changed the spring platforms the night before the test, a bit of an emergency fix because the car was grounding out on the trailer. I just did them 'high enough' so I really ought to revisit them to see if they're at all even.

It's interesting you kept the servo though, by any chance do you have any photos of it in place? I don't see anywhere it could fit on my car.


Slimy38 - 25/3/26 at 04:56 PM

I've actually managed to find one other car that uses the MX5 MC without the booster;

Description
Description


That's from GaryT's photo archive, and on the basis that later photo's show the same car with a reg plate, I'm guessing it was successful.