jlparsons
|
| posted on 13/7/09 at 08:37 PM |
|
|
new Jag XJ
What do we think then? Pretty or fugly? And more important, is it good donor material?
I ask because I'm trying to decide between this and the merc S-class. Obviously!
>>LINKY<<<
Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental. Some assembly required. Batteries not included. Contents may settle during
shipment. Use only as directed. No other warranty expressed or implied. Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment. Subject to
approval, terms and conditions apply. Apply only to affected area. For recreational use only. All models over 18 years of age. No user-serviceable
parts inside. Subject to change. As seen on TV. One size fits all. May contain nuts. Slippery when wet. For office use only. Edited for television.
Keep cool; process promptly.
|
|
|
|
|
tegwin
|
| posted on 13/7/09 at 08:44 PM |
|
|
Looks like an E classs to me
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would the last person who leaves the country please switch off the lights and close the door!
www.verticalhorizonsmedia.tv
|
|
|
David Jenkins
|
| posted on 13/7/09 at 09:03 PM |
|
|
It looks like the designers couldn't make up their minds...
Bits of it look very nice, but the bits don't look so good when put together... it looks like an American attempt at a fast saloon.
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 13/7/09 at 09:12 PM |
|
|
yeah, not bad... better than the last one i think. the old one looked a bit like a hyundai coupe i though
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
Daimo_45
|
| posted on 13/7/09 at 09:13 PM |
|
|
back looks brill but the front looks too much like the XF or like a sporty saloon. XJs are meant to be big, pompous and traditional!!!!
|
|
|
dinosaurjuice
|
| posted on 13/7/09 at 09:16 PM |
|
|
i think it looks great from the side. not so keen on the front...
|
|
|
flak monkey
|
| posted on 13/7/09 at 09:19 PM |
|
|
Like the front, not keen on the back....
Sera
http://www.motosera.com
|
|
|
Ninehigh
|
| posted on 13/7/09 at 11:10 PM |
|
|
The Jag? It's alright *cough*mondeo*cough cough*
Mind you that's not a bad thing...
|
|
|
richardh
|
| posted on 14/7/09 at 07:37 AM |
|
|
not the merc, the build quality is shocking.
suspension mounts rust through easily.
Mr clarkson slated them too, not that it makes a difference
Time for a change!
|
|
|
smart51
|
| posted on 14/7/09 at 07:54 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by David Jenkins
it looks like an American attempt at a fast saloon.
That's where most of them are sold.
|
|
|
chris-p-duck
|
| posted on 14/7/09 at 12:05 PM |
|
|
All I can say is don't judge it from the pictures. Wait till you see it on the road. Its stunning. I was unsure about the back end until I
saw it in the 'flesh'. Stunning is an understatement...
Chris
|
|
|
Minicooper
|
| posted on 14/7/09 at 12:10 PM |
|
|
I saw one on the road a few days ago, the pictures don't do it justice, it's a fantastic looking car
Cheers
David
|
|
|
jlparsons
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 04:42 PM |
|
|
I wasn't convinced initially but I've got to say, it's really grown on me.
Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental. Some assembly required. Batteries not included. Contents may settle during
shipment. Use only as directed. No other warranty expressed or implied. Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment. Subject to
approval, terms and conditions apply. Apply only to affected area. For recreational use only. All models over 18 years of age. No user-serviceable
parts inside. Subject to change. As seen on TV. One size fits all. May contain nuts. Slippery when wet. For office use only. Edited for television.
Keep cool; process promptly.
|
|
|
