Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: wishbone bushes or rose joint bearings?
degmwilliams

posted on 6/6/12 at 08:16 PM Reply With Quote
wishbone bushes or rose joint bearings?

Iv done some searches on here and cant really find the answer. On the tiger wishbones the bottom rear uses bearings to attach to the chassis. Is there any reason that i cant use bearings for all the joints? The cost between them isnt massive, i would just need to work out the lengths abit different. I have found on here that some people believe they could bend? How true is this? Thanks





Building a tiger Avon st170 (slowly)

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
vipe

posted on 6/6/12 at 08:34 PM Reply With Quote
aBeen used on aircraft for decades without problems. Racecars have/had problems because of improper loading.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 6/6/12 at 09:36 PM Reply With Quote
If you size the bearings correctly and don't put them in a location that will see large radial spike loads I can't see any reason at all not to use them on all joints. Other than the increased cost and the issue with having to ensure the correct boots are used.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Strontium Dog

posted on 6/6/12 at 09:38 PM Reply With Quote
I left some bushes in the rear arms on my Avon scratch build to help keep transmission and drive vibrations to a minimum but the front bones are all rose jointed.

My front bones are longer than standard too. I suspect the chassis was originally designed for a live axle and when it was re designed for IRS the front bones weren't sorted to match. The front track is significantly narrower than the rear as standard which IMHO is a bit pants. I also repositioned the rear top arm mounts to provide a slightly wider mounting point and put the bending moments further towards the ends of the chassis tubes.

That is what I have done but it is perfectly reasonable to rose joint it all, especially if it's a race car, whereas mine is primarily being built as road car.





http://s187.photobucket.com/albums/x319/zephyr2000/General%20forum%20uploads/?action=view¤t=3DEngine.mp4

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 7/6/12 at 11:00 AM Reply With Quote
this has come up many times, basically rose joints are more suited to track use and require replacement much more often than a bushed joint, around a couple of thousand miles seemed to be the norm.

They transmit more road noise and vibration than bushes but give zero play and more accurate handling, plus let you alter the geometry quickly and offcourse look very pretty. So really it boils down to what you want to do with your car and the size of your wallet.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 7/6/12 at 11:31 AM Reply With Quote
Many normal road cars use full sphericals in their suspension, they last a long time (100K) if sized correctly and kept booted.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
jrrsparky

posted on 7/6/12 at 10:41 PM Reply With Quote
"Motorsport rosejoints or they will break."
A quote from a well known manufacturer.

We used High Performance Rod End from www.mcgillmotorsports.co.uk

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.