Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Supercharging N/A, which cams?
laptoprob

posted on 10/12/12 at 09:09 PM Reply With Quote
Supercharging N/A, which cams?

So i have a standard C20XE engine with a C30 Rotrex charger to add at some point next year

I intend to up the CR to around 11:1 with some forged pistons but the question i need answering is what some of cam profile am i ultimately looking for?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 10/12/12 at 10:58 PM Reply With Quote
You need to lower the c/r not raise it.

Inlet duration and valves can be reduced as the compressor will make up for this, and open up the exhaust.

Although to be honest just use the cars standard cams and buy a book to work out what to do with the cam timing.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
snapper

posted on 10/12/12 at 11:23 PM Reply With Quote
Yep, do not increase compression to 11 to 1 with any sort of forced induction
You'll lunch the engine with detonation in seconds





I eat to survive
I drink to forget
I breath to pi55 my ex wife off (and now my ex partner)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
laptoprob

posted on 11/12/12 at 08:05 AM Reply With Quote
My initial thoughts on CR has always been low as poss, loads of boost but the new way is to maintain a good CR and low boost as in the new OMEX/ROTREX kit.

The zetec in JeffW's car runs 11.5:1 and is currently happy at 300hp(from memory).

LINKY

Its basically the same when peeps are adding turbos too these days.

Bailey Performance(Dan-very helpful chap) does the same. They say that the car behaves very well, with good throttle respone(on std CR) and no horrible lag due to an inefficient low comp engine.

I'm only quoting what others tell me here so dont shoot the messenger please

It just seems a great plan so i'm going to give it a try!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
liam.mccaffrey

posted on 11/12/12 at 08:24 AM Reply With Quote
Not wanting to hijack but i have a Turbo engine that I'm part way converting to Supercharged and I yet to investigate whether it would be better to use the Turbo cams or the NA cam for the engine.





Build Blog
Build Photo Album

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Phil.J

posted on 11/12/12 at 08:52 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by liam.mccaffrey
Not wanting to hijack but i have a Turbo engine that I'm part way converting to Supercharged and I yet to investigate whether it would be better to use the Turbo cams or the NA cam for the engine.


For maximum drivabilty go for the standard cams. If you are after maximum BHP for track use then look at something more radical.
Best to speak to a specialist for your engine rather than trying to re-invent the wheel, trying to sort badly running turbo conversions can be soul destroying..

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
MakeEverything

posted on 11/12/12 at 08:55 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Phil.J
quote:
Originally posted by liam.mccaffrey
trying to sort badly running turbo conversions can be soul destroying..


Tell me about it!





Kindest Regards,
Richard.

...You can make it foolProof, but youll never make it Idiot Proof!...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
jeffw

posted on 11/12/12 at 09:01 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by laptoprob
My initial thoughts on CR has always been low as poss, loads of boost but the new way is to maintain a good CR and low boost as in the new OMEX/ROTREX kit.

The zetec in JeffW's car runs 11.5:1 and is currently happy at 300hp(from memory).

LINKY

Its basically the same when peeps are adding turbos too these days.

Bailey Performance(Dan-very helpful chap) does the same. They say that the car behaves very well, with good throttle respone(on std CR) and no horrible lag due to an inefficient low comp engine.

I'm only quoting what others tell me here so dont shoot the messenger please

It just seems a great plan so i'm going to give it a try!


The C30-94 in my car only makes 15psi at 100K rpm (the 94 is limited to 100K the smaller ones are 120K). Of which I get about 9psi at the plenum. The engine is running forged pistons/rods (10.7:1 from memory so pretty much stock CR) and has ported/polished head with cams between Piper 285 and mild race. Car produces 300HP at the wheels...






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BaileyPerformance

posted on 11/12/12 at 11:25 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by snapper
Yep, do not increase compression to 11 to 1 with any sort of forced induction
You'll lunch the engine with detonation in seconds


That depends on the engine, the forced induction system and how well its tuned. High CR is more common on turbo / SC engines now, a turbo pinto would struggle at 11 to 1 CR but a XE/zetec/duratec would be fines long as its tuned properly (not with guess work!)

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
laptoprob

posted on 12/12/12 at 08:56 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BaileyPerformance
quote:
Originally posted by snapper
Yep, do not increase compression to 11 to 1 with any sort of forced induction
You'll lunch the engine with detonation in seconds


That depends on the engine, the forced induction system and how well its tuned. High CR is more common on turbo / SC engines now, a turbo pinto would struggle at 11 to 1 CR but a XE/zetec/duratec would be fines long as its tuned properly (not with guess work!)


HI Dan, knew you would be along anytime soon....

In your experiance on these setups am i btter off sticking with std cams and just trying verier pulleys?

My initial plan was to go for a flowed/ported head with some mediocre cams with a steadyish lift(286/11.5mm)?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
laptoprob

posted on 12/12/12 at 09:01 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by jeffw

The C30-94 in my car only makes 15psi at 100K rpm (the 94 is limited to 100K the smaller ones are 120K). Of which I get about 9psi at the plenum. The engine is running forged pistons/rods (10.7:1 from memory so pretty much stock CR) and has ported/polished head with cams between Piper 285 and mild race. Car produces 300HP at the wheels...


Spoke with Richard at TTS today who tells me that my C30-74 will happily put out 12 psi but the key is to make sure you keep as much as possible at the plenum by using a good cooler with little pressure drop.

I would be a happy chappy with 300hp at the wheels but i'm searching for that at the fly so think its quite achievable looking at what you have and also speaking with Dan@Bailey about his conversions.

Looking forward to the task in hand indeed....

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
laptoprob

posted on 12/12/12 at 09:02 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by liam.mccaffrey
Not wanting to hijack but i have a Turbo engine that I'm part way converting to Supercharged and I yet to investigate whether it would be better to use the Turbo cams or the NA cam for the engine.


Which engine do you have?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
jeffw

posted on 12/12/12 at 09:51 PM Reply With Quote
Certainly with a decent cooler (air or water) mine would be well into the high 300s at the fly. Trouble is the gearbox/prop/English axle wouldn't stand it. Until I can afford the Sequential box & high-spec Atlas there is little point.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 12/12/12 at 10:36 PM Reply With Quote
You may find 'special turbo cams' are just lower spec than standard for the engine.

I,m pretty sure when ford bought out the RS turbo, 1600cc engine the cam used was from a 1300 engine.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
liam.mccaffrey

posted on 13/12/12 at 12:04 AM Reply With Quote
Its a volvo T5, also available in NA trim.


quote:
Originally posted by laptoprob
quote:
Originally posted by liam.mccaffrey
Not wanting to hijack but i have a Turbo engine that I'm part way converting to Supercharged and I yet to investigate whether it would be better to use the Turbo cams or the NA cam for the engine.


Which engine do you have?






Build Blog
Build Photo Album

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
snapper

posted on 13/12/12 at 06:45 AM Reply With Quote
I once talked to a tuner in Colchester who was struggling with a high compression radical cam engine that the owner bolted a turbo to
Undrivable the tuner said, it comes on cam just as the turbo boost hits, driving it meant that it just span up its wheels as soon as you hit 4kand went sideways





I eat to survive
I drink to forget
I breath to pi55 my ex wife off (and now my ex partner)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
laptoprob

posted on 13/12/12 at 06:59 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by snapper
I once talked to a tuner in Colchester who was struggling with a high compression radical cam engine that the owner bolted a turbo to
Undrivable the tuner said, it comes on cam just as the turbo boost hits, driving it meant that it just span up its wheels as soon as you hit 4kand went sideways


Hence the reason i went supercharger not turbo

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
jeffw

posted on 13/12/12 at 08:08 PM Reply With Quote
My power curve is virtualy a straight line. The more you rev it the more power you get, there is no sudden kick like a turbo.

Have a look at this video down the straights to see what I mean



This is with my son in the car and I was taking it easy but you can get a feel for the linear power delivery. Remember to switch to 1080p



[Edited on 13/12/12 by jeffw]






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
laptoprob

posted on 13/12/12 at 08:42 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by jeffw
My power curve is virtualy a straight line. The more you rev it the more power you get, there is no sudden kick like a turbo.

Have a look at this video down the straights to see what I mean



This is with my son in the car and I was taking it easy but you can get a feel for the linear power delivery. Remember to switch to 1080p



[Edited on 13/12/12 by jeffw]


Love the soundtrack and the way the engine responds. Never loses that revability that the turbos suffer with which is what sells it to me.

Do you or have you had any trouble with overheating and where did you put the intercooler?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
jeffw

posted on 13/12/12 at 08:48 PM Reply With Quote
Using a standard Polo rad without an issue (so far). The intercooler is in the nose of the car








View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
laptoprob

posted on 14/12/12 at 08:11 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by jeffw
Using a standard Polo rad without an issue (so far). The intercooler is in the nose of the car




Nice job Jeff, who did the pipes and intercooler?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
BenB

posted on 14/12/12 at 08:21 AM Reply With Quote
Back to the original question, you actually want quite a tame cam. Sporty cams generally have loads of overlap to encourage scavenging of the exhaust from the cylinders. In a forced induction setup you don't want oodles of overlap because you'll wee away all the PSI you've been lovingly creating.
Regarding compression ratios it all depends on what boost level you're using, what fuels you're going to run, what level of intercooling you're going to have, whether you'ld consider water or methanol injection etc etc.

You can run an engine on RON95 at 11:1 but you'ld be restricted on boost levels (prob high single figures) even if you run a goodly size intercooler.

In my photo archive there's a scan of graph from G.Bell's Forced Induction Tuning showing recommended boost vs CR.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
jossey

posted on 14/12/12 at 08:26 AM Reply With Quote
Rob,

How am I supposed to keep up with you now.....

Right I need a hayabusa now.

Good luck with the project though.

Just a quick question.... Say you put the supercharger on and let's say it touches 320hp??? Ish... Then what's next?





Thanks



David Johnson

Building my tiger avon slowly but surely.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
jeffw

posted on 14/12/12 at 09:25 AM Reply With Quote
The intercooler is a Toyosport EBay special and the pipework was made up by Fury Sportscars when they did the install for me. It is very space limited at the front of a Phoenix hence why the oil cooler is in front of everything.

The max plenum temp I see after a 20min track session is 50 deg C which is OK. It does drop 6psi across the cooler though.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
jeffw

posted on 14/12/12 at 10:16 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BenB
Back to the original question, you actually want quite a tame cam. Sporty cams generally have loads of overlap to encourage scavenging of the exhaust from the cylinders. In a forced induction setup you don't want oodles of overlap because you'll wee away all the PSI you've been lovingly creating.
Regarding compression ratios it all depends on what boost level you're using, what fuels you're going to run, what level of intercooling you're going to have, whether you'ld consider water or methanol injection etc etc.

You can run an engine on RON95 at 11:1 but you'ld be restricted on boost levels (prob high single figures) even if you run a goodly size intercooler.

In my photo archive there's a scan of graph from G.Bell's Forced Induction Tuning showing recommended boost vs CR.


These 'new-age' rotrex supercharged systems are effectively 'super' NA engines and the tuning is based on this idea. Low boost (1 bar in my case) and high compression, big cams etc.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.