Fcck2000
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 12:12 PM |
|
|
MX-5 6 speed gearbox does it replace type 9?
Hi All,
I'm currently running a Tiger Supercat with a Mazda MZR engine.
As it's the winter I was thinking of fitting the 6 speed Mazda gearbox from an MX5 Sport, I know the bellhousing will fit because this is the
car the engine came from. The gearbox does look quite a bit bigger and I believe it sits at an angle of 10 degrees. Other than that I'm a bit in
the dark.
Has anyone fitted the Mazda 6 speed box to a Duratec MZR engine in a Tiger Supercat or similar? Would be interesting to know how the setup works and
if it's worth the effort removing the type 9.
Thanks
Paul
Tiger SSC
220bhp on standard MZR Duratec engine with throttle bodies and mild camshaft upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
pewe
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 12:23 PM |
|
|
Don't know about compatability but IIRC the 6 speed Mazda box ends up with almost the same top gear as the 5 speed.
That poses the question as to whether the Mazda box will give any advantage compared to a Type 9?
Just a thought.
Cheers, Pewe10 
|
|
|
Fcck2000
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 12:36 PM |
|
|
Thanks for the reply, thing is I'm concerned that the type 9 (standard) in my car is going to let me down at some point because we are pushing
it over the estimated power level of 180bhp.
I've had a really bad year in regards to things breaking and spoiling track days so I'm wanting to use the winter to do all I can to make
sure I'm driving not fixing at events next year. It does seem that the 6 speed Mazda gearbox has more strength than a standard type 9. From what
I've read the syncros are different which makes for quicker reliable gear changes.
I also like the idea of 6 gears :-)
Tiger SSC
220bhp on standard MZR Duratec engine with throttle bodies and mild camshaft upgrade.
|
|
|
kingster996
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 12:38 PM |
|
|
I'd get the type 9 sent off to BGH - long first gear and bearing upgrade - good for 240bhp and much more useable first gear.
It's what I'll be doing soon!
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure
|
|
|
CNHSS1
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 01:21 PM |
|
|
Jeff with the supercharged Fury ran a Type nine with eleventy thousand hp on track, probably worth dropping him a line for his thoughts
"Racing is life, everything else, before or after, is just waiting"---Steve McQueen
|
|
|
Fcck2000
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 01:27 PM |
|
|
I'm getting the impression that the thoughts are to stay with the type 9 gearbox with upgraded internals.
Tiger SSC
220bhp on standard MZR Duratec engine with throttle bodies and mild camshaft upgrade.
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 01:31 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fcck2000
I'm getting the impression that the thoughts are to stay with the type 9 gearbox with upgraded internals.
Thats what I'd go with
Also remember that the 180bhp, I think, was suggested as the maximum for a sierra. Your cars a lot lighter. Could probably take 1000bhp with no axle
or load connected
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
mcerd1
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 01:49 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fcck2000
I'm getting the impression that the thoughts are to stay with the type 9 gearbox with upgraded internals.
if the engine is designed to be tilted at 10° and its attached to the correct box that achieves this and is also strong enough for the engine - then
I'd the only problems I can see are whether or not it fits in the space you've got and getting a custom prop / mounts made
someone posted the rough dimensions for the 6 speed box a while back, but I can't find the thread...
quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
Also remember that the 180bhp, I think, was suggested as the maximum for a sierra. Your cars a lot lighter. Could probably take 1000bhp with no axle
or load connected
^^ 145bhp is the suggested limit for the 2.0 type 9 in the sierra (its torque that kills them really, but its harder to get figures)
BGH quote same limits for both the stock and modified boxes on there website
in lightweight cars folk seem to use them up to 180/200bhp without issue, some folk have used them all the way past 250bhp in stock form but
that's taking quite a big risk...
[Edited on 14/11/2014 by mcerd1]
-
|
|
|
cliftyhanger
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 02:08 PM |
|
|
I am a bit confused by the replies.
It seems that most people are against the swap, but why??
OK, it means a few changes to prop, mounts etc, but the mazda box will be stronger, and it may have better gear ratios??
I would say if the ratios are good, go for it. Probably as cheap as getting the t9 upgraded...
|
|
|
Fcck2000
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 02:36 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
Also remember that the 180bhp, I think, was suggested as the maximum for a sierra. Your cars a lot lighter. Could probably take 1000bhp with no axle
or load connected
^^ 145bhp is the suggested limit for the 2.0 type 9 in the sierra (its torque that kills them really, but its harder to get figures)
BGH quote same limits for both the stock and modified boxes on there website
in lightweight cars folk seem to use them up to 180/200bhp without issue, some folk have used them all the way past 250bhp in stock form but
that's taking quite a big risk...
[Edited on 14/11/2014 by mcerd1]
To upgrade a type 9 gearbox could cost me in excess of a grand, having spent that money I still could break it which then puts me a couple of thousand
out of pocket.
Fitting a newer modern box that can be bought for £350 all day long seems a much more practical option. The cost of the new box could be recouped with
the sale of my type 9 and bellhousing.
I guess it's more a case of will one actually fit in the space I have and will the box be OK as my engine and sump are mounted square, making
the gear lever angle over is no real issue.
Agreed it is torque that kills gears although gear changes at high rpms kill syncros. From what I understand the Mazda box has a triple syncro system
to allow for faster gear changes without the crunches.
Paul
Tiger SSC
220bhp on standard MZR Duratec engine with throttle bodies and mild camshaft upgrade.
|
|
|
coozer
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 03:17 PM |
|
|
I'd stick with the type 9, the Mazda 6 speed box is very heavy and the extra cog isn't worth the work involved in the swap. New clutch,
prop, mounts etc...
Although you have 180 bhp the car is lighter, not as much mass to accelerate so the box has an easier time.
Ring gbh and discuss the ratios that will make the car easier to drive!
1972 V8 Jago
1980 Z750
|
|
|
Ugg10
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 03:40 PM |
|
|
MX6 ratios type 9 Std Type 9 Long 1st
1 3.76 3.65 2.98
2 2.27 1.97 1.97
3 1.65 1.37 1.37
4 1.26 1.00 1.00
5 1.00 0.82 0.82
6 0.84
Info from - http://www.miata.net/garage/KnowYourCar/S8_Gears.html and http://www.bghgeartech.co.uk/html/5_speed.html and
http://www.type9gearbox.co.uk/type-9-production.html
There are two reasons for replacing the type 9 - too much torque/power which will kill the box and also the very short 1st and big gap to 2nd.
The MX5 box may help the first issue but does nothing to solve the second.
Given the hassle of fitting this box as mentioned before (possibly chassis fouling, prop, new mounts, clutch conversion, speedo drive etc.) for a
similar cost you can have a BGH long 1st Heavy duty than can be swapped in an afternoon. (other long 1st are available if you search). I suspect both
will be a similar price (around £1k) to do.
---------------------------------------------------------------
1968 Ford Anglia 105e, 1.7 Zetec SE, Mk2 Escort Workd Cup front end, 5 link rear
Build Blog - http://Anglia1968.weebly.com
|
|
|
Fcck2000
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 04:19 PM |
|
|
Thanks for taking the time to search that info.
From what I understand Caterham, Morgan and some others are using the Mazda boxes without any failure issues. I know it's going to take time
fitting but could be worth the effort.
Having a 1k rebuilt type 9 old technology gearbox compared to a brand new from Mazda box for £1400 odd seems like a no brainer even with the effort to
fit it.
Tiger SSC
220bhp on standard MZR Duratec engine with throttle bodies and mild camshaft upgrade.
|
|
|
Ugg10
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 05:31 PM |
|
|
Haven't a clue how easy/hard it would be to fit but have you considered the T5 out of the Sierra 2WD cosworth/TVRs.
Ratios seem to be better -
1st = 2.95:1
2nd = 1.94:1
3rd = 1.34:1
4th = 1:1
5th = 0.80:1
Ford Sierra Cosworth 2wd T5 Gearbox
Dimensions for T5 and Type nine in here - http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=167973
Not sure hat you would need to do but these guys do an adapter fit the duratec to T5 - http://www.mulfab.co.uk/our-products/7/other-miscellaneous
---------------------------------------------------------------
1968 Ford Anglia 105e, 1.7 Zetec SE, Mk2 Escort Workd Cup front end, 5 link rear
Build Blog - http://Anglia1968.weebly.com
|
|
|
radom
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 08:24 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ugg10
MX6 ratios type 9 Std Type 9 Long 1st
1 3.76 3.65 2.98
2 2.27 1.97 1.97
3 1.65 1.37 1.37
4 1.26 1.00 1.00
5 1.00 0.82 0.82
6 0.84
The MX5 box may help the first issue but does nothing to solve the second.
I don't know, mx5 ratios still look better even when compared to type9 with long 1st IMHO 
|
|
|
Ben_Copeland
|
| posted on 14/11/14 at 08:34 PM |
|
|
I'm running a type 9 in mine. Power and torque figures above my picture. It's been fine this year, don't forget your pushing around
a lot less weight than a Sierra
Ben
Locost Map on Google Maps
Z20LET Astra Turbo, into a Haynes
Roadster
Enter Your Details Here
http://www.facebook.com/EquinoxProducts for all your bodywork needs!
|
|
|
Jenko
|
| posted on 15/11/14 at 07:14 AM |
|
|
Another vote for sticking with the type 9, many, many people are running much more power than 180bhp, they are very under stressed in our tiny light
cars.
MY BLOG - http://westfieldv8.blogspot.co.uk/
|
|
|
jeffw
|
| posted on 15/11/14 at 07:45 AM |
|
|
I run a BGH E8 Alloy cased Type 9 in the Phoenix. The engine produces 397BHP & 300ft/lb in 610Kg car. The car is used extensively for Sprinting
and trackday as well as occasional road use.
I've nuked the gearbox twice this year, on both occasions it let go while changing gear over a bump, so failed under shock load. It will deal
with the power but not shock load and power at the same time.
If the Mazda box will fit then go with that otherwise a BGH E6 will do everything you want for a long time to come.
|
|
|
Furyous
|
| posted on 15/11/14 at 09:01 AM |
|
|
I went with the MX5 5-speed for my Duratec install. I snagged it for £125 just before Christmas a couple of years ago. 
The type 9 had sloppy feeling gear changes but the MX5 box has a very nice click-clack bolt action feel to it. That may have just been my particular
Type 9, though. The N7 is a fair bit bigger than the Type 9 and it's a tight squeeze in the transmission tunnel, compared to bags of space with
the Type 9. The main issue I had mounting it is that it's quite "tall" so it almost ended up hanging under the chassis whereas the
Type 9 was a couple of inches above. The N7 bellhousing is wider than the ones used for Type-9 to Duratec mounting, which means less ground clearance.
I think the Raceline sumps would end up being a bit higher than the bottom of the bellhousing.
I'm pretty sure the 6 speed has a bigger housing, and it weighs more. But the gears are shorter and the final drive is pretty much the same as
the 5 speed.
Clutch, flywheel and starter are easy to work out. You just use MX5 parts. No need to mix and match different bits. Bear in mind the MX5 clutch is
hydraulic and the Type 9 is (probably) cable.
Using the N7 box made the install a bit awkward but I don't regret using it.
5 Speed Ratios:
1 - 3.136
2 - 1.888
3 - 1.330
4 - 1.00
5 - 0.814
[Edited on 15/11/14 by Furyous]
|
|
|
Fcck2000
|
| posted on 15/11/14 at 09:11 AM |
|
|
good to hear from someone using the mx5 box. £125 is a right bargain... Sounds like you are happy with the mx5 box and it was worth the effort.
Tiger SSC
220bhp on standard MZR Duratec engine with throttle bodies and mild camshaft upgrade.
|
|
|
johnH20
|
| posted on 15/11/14 at 07:02 PM |
|
|
I have just weighed a spare MX5 5spd on my scales ( bathroom ). It is 34 kg incl integral bell housing. Not sure how this compares to a 6 spd but that
is unlikely to be more than 40 kg I would have thought. FWIW the concensus in the MX5 community seems to be that the 5 spd has a sweeter shift than
the 6 spd. Certainly my experience too. Hope this helps your decision.
|
|
|
mcerd1
|
| posted on 16/11/14 at 12:02 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ugg10
Haven't a clue how easy/hard it would be to fit but have you considered the T5 out of the Sierra 2WD cosworth/TVRs.
T5's are stronger, but they were never fitted to that many cars in the uk
also the cossie and TVR boxes are quite different - the TVR box is a version of the 'world class' ones that are used on loads of American
muscle cars (at least the 'stick shift ones)
the cossie box is the non-world class version that was only really in rwd cossie's and have different ratio's too
also I notice that those adapters need an MT75 bellhousing to suit the engine
do they mean the FWD MTX75 box or one of the very expensive aftermarket removable MT75 ones ?
if it comes to it you can modify a type 9 bellhousing to fit a T5 without too much trouble (depending on the space available on the casting) and its
probably easier than finding the right MT75 bellhousing 
-
|
|
|
Fcck2000
|
| posted on 16/11/14 at 12:50 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by jeffw
I run a BGH E8 Alloy cased Type 9 in the Phoenix. The engine produces 397BHP & 300ft/lb in 610Kg car. The car is used extensively for Sprinting
and trackday as well as occasional road use.
I've nuked the gearbox twice this year, on both occasions it let go while changing gear over a bump, so failed under shock load. It will deal
with the power but not shock load and power at the same time.
If the Mazda box will fit then go with that otherwise a BGH E6 will do everything you want for a long time to come.
I called these guys on Friday after coming across them on the internet http://vitesse-ltd.com/
Spoke to a guy called Tim who was very happy to look at my car to see whether the 5 speed or 6 speed gearbox would fit. Apparently they've been
supplying Morgan, Caterham and others the Mazda gearboxes for some time now and with great success. From what I understood they've supplied
hundreds without a single failure! Tim did say if I took my car over to them they would have a look and advise the parts required to use either the
Mazda 5 speed or 6 speed whichever would fit.
Having looked at your post with 2 gearbox fails in one season it might be worth also giving them a call. I was quoted roughly £1100 for a 5 speed
Mazda box and £1400 for a 6 speed Mazda box, both would be brand new items from Mazda.
Edited because my facts were wrong...
Paul
[Edited on 16/11/14 by Fcck2000]
Tiger SSC
220bhp on standard MZR Duratec engine with throttle bodies and mild camshaft upgrade.
|
|
|
Ugg10
|
| posted on 16/11/14 at 03:49 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fcck2000
quote:
Originally posted by jeffw
5 speed Type 9 BGH E8 weight 72kg (possibly more with all the upgraded internals) £2200
5 speed Mazda weight 45kg £1100
Interesting weight on the bgh box. I put my standard type 9 plus zetec se ally bell housing and clutch frk on my scales and got 36kg. So less than the
mazda.
---------------------------------------------------------------
1968 Ford Anglia 105e, 1.7 Zetec SE, Mk2 Escort Workd Cup front end, 5 link rear
Build Blog - http://Anglia1968.weebly.com
|
|
|
Fcck2000
|
| posted on 16/11/14 at 03:57 PM |
|
|
Indeed you are correct, well spotted and thanks for pointing out.
Just checked and I was reading lbs not kg. Looks like the 2.8 type 9 is 45kg but a standard one is 33kg
info from here
http://westfield-world.com/engineandtransmission.html
Tiger SSC
220bhp on standard MZR Duratec engine with throttle bodies and mild camshaft upgrade.
|
|
|
