myke pocock
|
| posted on 7/1/15 at 10:43 PM |
|
|
LocUst not Locost
1968 LOCOST SEVEN Tax Exempt, Correctly Registered kitcar westfield seats
Some people appear not to know what they are looking at.
Is this a TRADE ADVERTISEMENT?? Click HERE to report it!
|
|
|
|
|
loggyboy
|
| posted on 7/1/15 at 11:31 PM |
|
|
Surely it cant be tax exempt if it's correctly registered?
Mistral Motorsport
|
|
|
K13JOB
|
| posted on 7/1/15 at 11:47 PM |
|
|
The registration is correct, if it is actually the same car...
http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/MTIwMFgxNjAw/z/ifoAAOSw6aVUqp0r/$_57.JPG
[Edited on 7/1/15 by K13JOB]
|
|
|
theduck
|
| posted on 8/1/15 at 06:19 AM |
|
|
Yes it is built to the locust plans, but he didn't build it and it is registered as locost?
|
|
|
mookaloid
|
| posted on 8/1/15 at 09:44 AM |
|
|
At £1550 it looks all the money in the world for that with 7 days to go.....
"That thing you're thinking - it wont be that."
|
|
|
prawnabie
|
| posted on 8/1/15 at 10:18 AM |
|
|
I would say it was labelled as a "locost" during the DVLA registration amesty. I had the same problem with a previous car I owned, filled
in a form and got sent a new logbook with the correct details on.
Shaun
[Edited on 8/1/15 by prawnabie]
|
|
|
stevebubs
|
| posted on 8/1/15 at 12:03 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by loggyboy
Surely it cant be tax exempt if it's correctly registered?
With older (pre-SVA) builds, the tax-exempt thing on some registrations was a bit haphazard...
|
|
|
Slimy38
|
| posted on 8/1/15 at 12:24 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by prawnabie
I would say it was labelled as a "locost" during the DVLA registration amesty. I had the same problem with a previous car I owned, filled
in a form and got sent a new logbook with the correct details on.
Shaun
[Edited on 8/1/15 by prawnabie]
Yep, my thoughts as well. The tax exempt then comes from the original registration age, regardless of how old the car actually is.
|
|
|
