Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: Engine mounts fitting angle duratec
gav2612

posted on 4/1/16 at 08:53 AM Reply With Quote
Engine mounts fitting angle duratec

Hi all and happy new year!

I've now got my duratec engine/ mx5 gearbox combo temporarily sitting in the car and am measuring up for mounts so exciting start to 2016. My question is, is it better to get a slight upward angle on the engine mounts, or would it be ok to simply have them parallel to the ground. I'm planning a similar design to the below picture. The height of the top of my rubber mounts means that instead of an upward angle shown in the picture, I could simply weld the box section i'm using flat to the top of the rubber mount and square to the plate on the engine meaning very little cutting at any angles
Description
Description

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
gav2612

posted on 4/1/16 at 09:00 AM Reply With Quote
apologies for the very poor picture, but I blew it up from a thumbnail. The raceline Duratec mounts have a very shallow angle on them particularly the passenger side. Any issues with replicating this, or is the load better transferred in the picture in the earlier post?

Description
Description

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 4/1/16 at 09:31 AM Reply With Quote
An angle always looks better, but a mount is a plate bolted to the engine and a plate on top of the rubber mount.
How and what you link them with matters little, pipe, box, channel, even an I beam (if small enough ) would work.

( I wouldn't use angle though as it twists. )

The main thing is that the material is thick enough. Those plates bolted to the engine in your example pic look thin.
Several people have had mounts fracture for this very reason.


I have used 25 x 25 box with 3mm wall, and 4mm plates, but mine are SS so a tad stronger.


HTH
Paul G

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
gav2612

posted on 4/1/16 at 09:56 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks, that's just the info I needed. mine should be plenty heavy enough. I've got 5mm plate with 4mm wall thickness 50mm box, all mild steel. Probably a bit of overkill, but I'd rather have some extra weight here and remove the screen, wipers, washers, heater etc to save it elsewhere.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 4/1/16 at 09:59 AM Reply With Quote
You have hit a nail on the head.

There's places to save and places not to.

Paul G

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Hornet

posted on 4/1/16 at 01:09 PM Reply With Quote
Hi bud. Just thought I'd mention that I used the next hole along as per your first picture and caught 3 bolts in a triangular fashion. I had to do this as my exhaust manifold was touching the mounts. It bows clears perfectly. Ps I used 75x25 box section
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
peter030371

posted on 4/1/16 at 01:53 PM Reply With Quote
Not got many good pictures of the engine mounts in mine but found these few. As you can just make out the exhaust side is a very shallow angle and the inlet side is a little more angled.

engine in1
engine in1


engine in2
engine in2


engine in3
engine in3


And the bonnet fits like this, with the scuttle and nose cone now on the bonnet has been lifted by 5-10mm so I have loads of room

bonnet on
bonnet on


Bonnet on2
Bonnet on2

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
big-vee-twin

posted on 4/1/16 at 09:18 PM Reply With Quote
Those engine mounts were made by Fastdan, been tried and tested on his race car before he made those for me.

Just remember you need to get the engine as high as you can to give more ground clearance whilst observing bonnet line.

Also don't block the dip stick hole.





Duratec Engine is fitted, MS2 Extra V3 is assembled and tested, engine running, car now built. IVA passed 26/02/2016

http://www.triangleltd.com

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
peter030371

posted on 21/1/16 at 02:29 PM Reply With Quote
I seem to recall the OP asking about the front crossmember in a Striker with a Duratec install but I can't find the thread. This is how my chassis has been built to take a Duratec if it helps. As far as I know this chassis section was like this from new by RAW.

Front crossmember
Front crossmember

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 21/1/16 at 02:33 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by peter030371
I seem to recall the OP asking about the front crossmember in a Striker with a Duratec install but I can't find the thread. This is how my chassis has been built to take a Duratec if it helps. As far as I know this chassis section was like this from new by RAW.


http://locostbuilders.co.uk/forum/2/viewthread.php?tid=201796





Mistral Motorsport

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
peter030371

posted on 21/1/16 at 02:52 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by loggyboy
quote:
Originally posted by peter030371
I seem to recall the OP asking about the front crossmember in a Striker with a Duratec install but I can't find the thread. This is how my chassis has been built to take a Duratec if it helps. As far as I know this chassis section was like this from new by RAW.


http://locostbuilders.co.uk/forum/2/viewthread.php?tid=201796


Now why couldn't I find that! Now updated with my picture

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.