Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Mot question, as of may 2018 (MOT Tester?)
steve m

posted on 5/6/18 at 07:56 PM Reply With Quote
Mot question, as of may 2018 (MOT Tester?)

Hi All

I went to book my 7 in for its Mot earlier today, and the Tester, someone ive known for 30 years, and done about 15 tests on my locost 7, said that before he could do the Mot, he had to read up about kit cars and the like, as the new Mot test (may2018) had a specific article about them, and their specific requirement's compared to normal road cars

Ive read as much as I can about the current Mot rules on line, etc, and not found a thing about Kit cars

Has any one else had a similar problem, or any one had there kit car done recently , that could point me to an area I can look for anything relating to kit cars and the CURRENT 2018 MOT rules ?

So, I failed in even booking an Mot !


regards

steve





Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at




View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
obfripper

posted on 5/6/18 at 09:13 PM Reply With Quote
There's nothing specific changed for kit cars in the new mot, there are some things that changed for all vehicles that are more likely to affect kit cars such as:
Removal of the engine age changing the applicable emissions limits - this is now by the 1st registration date or v5c limits if present (unless you're pre 2001 registered, pre sva and q plate still fall under visual smoke only)
Reverse lamp presence/operation for 2009 onward vehicles.
Hid lamps fitted in non dcr marked enclosures now fail regardless of beam pattern.

There's probably a few more, but nothing major i can think of.
Have a read of:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mot-changes-from-may-2018-guidance-for-mot-testers
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mot-inspection-manual-for-class-3-4-5-and-7-vehicles
This is basically all that we've been supplied as guidance for applying the new mot changes, there are alot of things that have changed and are not even mentioned in this guidance.
There are also a handful of items that fail according to the testing manual, yet have no failure on the testing system - some have been corrected, but we're waiting on the rest.

Dave

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
steve m

posted on 5/6/18 at 09:32 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks for the reply, my car is pre SVA/IVA, so as far as I can see falls in into the visual smoke test, and no emissions, although Hes always done the emissions, and its always passed on the 1979 original car V5





Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at




View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
twybrow

posted on 5/6/18 at 10:58 PM Reply With Quote
I am wondering what will be said about my car next month - a BEC with no reverse gear, so no reverse light. Is it a case of 'if it is fitted it has to work' I wonder....?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 6/6/18 at 05:07 AM Reply With Quote
If it was me I think that I would firstly get the car correctly registered.





The one and only member of the Suttol Owners Club. Now also the MX5 Owners Club. A few more in that one.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ken555

posted on 6/6/18 at 08:35 AM Reply With Quote
I had an MOT yesterday, and the emissions machine wouldn't allow a "Visual inspection" even though the car is a Q reg since 1987.

It wanted CO < 4.5% and HC of <1200 ppm, is this the new standard ?

Tester was confused by it and couldn't get thru on phone to check with DVSA.

MOT MANUAL ONline seems to suggest it doesn't need checked.

You must inspect vehicles with spark ignition engines first used on or after 1 August 1975.

For emissions purposes only you should treat the following as first used before 1 August 1975: kit cars and amateur built vehicles first used before 1 August 1998 Wankel rotary engined vehicles first used before 1 August 1987 Q plated vehicles

Testers though that the latest software update has removed the visual inspection option.

[Edited on 6-6-18 by ken555]






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
obfripper

posted on 6/6/18 at 12:14 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ken555
I had an MOT yesterday, and the emissions machine wouldn't allow a "Visual inspection" even though the car is a Q reg since 1987.

It wanted CO < 4.5% and HC of <1200 ppm, is this the new standard ?

Tester was confused by it and couldn't get thru on phone to check with DVSA.

MOT MANUAL ONline seems to suggest it doesn't need checked.

You must inspect vehicles with spark ignition engines first used on or after 1 August 1975.

For emissions purposes only you should treat the following as first used before 1 August 1975: kit cars and amateur built vehicles first used before 1 August 1998 Wankel rotary engined vehicles first used before 1 August 1987 Q plated vehicles

Testers though that the latest software update has removed the visual inspection option.

[Edited on 6-6-18 by ken555]


A Q plate is only ever a visual check for petrol or diesel vehicles.
There is no need for any paperwork with a visual only check - it may have previously been an option on his emissions equipment to give a printout, but is not required for customer or dvsa records.

Dave

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
motorcycle_mayhem

posted on 6/6/18 at 05:31 PM Reply With Quote
It'll be interesting to find out what the 'optional' MoT test will have as a 'pass' definition for historic vehicles. Given that it's already been said (for what that's worth) that a historic 'fail' on an MoT will have to be fixed. Now there's an incentive to have your hysterical vehicle checked. I have until December to decide (the Land Rover), hopefully all resolved and understood by then.

Also, and very kit car relevant, the Q-plate thing appears to have been left untouched (which is superb, why anyone would want anything but a Q I still fail to understand, just seems a vanity thing). BUT remember there are many 'historic' Ford MK Duttons out there, for which an 'historic' MoT should have remained rather limited. We'll see.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
big_wasa

posted on 6/6/18 at 06:27 PM Reply With Quote
I took mine about three weeks ago and its a 1.8 pinto, its on an age related plate and again the machine wanted CO < 4.5% and HC of <1200 ppm.
Now it passed this ok despite being a touch rich

BUT...

The guy was adamant that when I fit a newer engine it would be tested according to the date of the engine. Surely its got to be the age of the chassis ?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
obfripper

posted on 6/6/18 at 07:27 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by big_wasa
I took mine about three weeks ago and its a 1.8 pinto, its on an age related plate and again the machine wanted CO < 4.5% and HC of <1200 ppm.
Now it passed this ok despite being a touch rich

BUT...

The guy was adamant that when I fit a newer engine it would be tested according to the date of the engine. Surely its got to be the age of the chassis ?


You're right, as things were it was according to the oldest of the engine age or first registration, with the new changes it is date of first registration only that determines the default emissions limit.
For vehicles that have passed sva/iva, they are tested to the emissions limits on the v5c if present, if not present then according to the first registration date.
For your vehicle this would mean v5c limits, or a full cat test.

Dave

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
pif

posted on 12/7/18 at 01:33 PM Reply With Quote
I don't have a CAT fitted as on a carb bike engine. But on my v5 it has a Lambda set of readings. I suppose it will be that I am expected to "pass" this. Any thoughts on how this will pan out?

I can prob squeeze through the Co2 and HC limits.





been a bit of a rush job really, bodged it all together in just 5 1/2 years.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
steve m

posted on 12/7/18 at 08:50 PM Reply With Quote
I forgot about writing this thread!

Firstly to 907, my car is correctly registered, as it is PRE SVA/IVA, and something you may of missed in the original question,

but secondly, I still havnt done the MOT, due work holidays and having a good life, plus I do 500 miles a day now at work, so do I want to drive a little noisy machine at week ends!

steve





Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at




View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
obfripper

posted on 12/7/18 at 10:05 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by pif
I don't have a CAT fitted as on a carb bike engine. But on my v5 it has a Lambda set of readings. I suppose it will be that I am expected to "pass" this. Any thoughts on how this will pan out?

I can prob squeeze through the Co2 and HC limits.


I would have thought your vehicle should be on 3.5% CO and 1200ppm HC with no lambda requirement, assuming your current plate was the age related plate at registration.
If this is post 08/95 then a cat test will be required, unless the tester looks at the E reg and puts it down as 1987/8 on the emissions tester.

If you have a look at your sva/iva certificate, the last digit of the class/type code will give the correct emissions limit. The dvla are good at getting this wrong.

A Visual test only;
B Emission limit 4.5% CO, HC 1200ppm;
C Emission limit 3.5%, CO, HC 1200ppm;
D Emission limit 0.5% CO, Fast idle 0.3% CO, 200ppm HC; Lambda 0.97 1.03;
E Emissions limit as per DOT current In Service Emissions Standards book;
F Emissions limit Diesel 2.5m-1;
G Emissions limit Turbo Diesel 3.0m-1


Dave

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
chrisbmxr

posted on 13/7/18 at 06:48 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by twybrow
I am wondering what will be said about my car next month - a BEC with no reverse gear, so no reverse light. Is it a case of 'if it is fitted it has to work' I wonder....?


I had my BEC MOT'd last week with no issues at all. Mine does have a reverse, but I didn't think it was a requirement for the MOT?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
pif

posted on 13/7/18 at 11:44 AM Reply With Quote
Mine is on an age-related E but "first registered" in 2007.

The V5 shows emissions of %CO0.5 0.3FI HC0.02FI and Lambda 0.97 - 1.03

Its got no CAT and is on carbs.





been a bit of a rush job really, bodged it all together in just 5 1/2 years.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [ 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.