Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Ssc stylus zeteC to aj-v6 swap
nick9one1

posted on 10/4/26 at 10:46 PM Reply With Quote
Ssc stylus zeteC to aj-v6 swap

I've got my eye on a stylus with a 1.6 zetec, twin Weber 40's, type 9 gearbox and a live rear axle (presume MK2 escort).

I like the car bout would really like to put an aj-30 in it.

From what I've researched, I would need the engine, an mx5 or Jag gearbox. Then speeduino/mega squirt etc.
I would have to fabricate new brackets (which is fine).

Is there anything else major I have missed?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ugg10

posted on 11/4/26 at 07:16 AM Reply With Quote
From memory of my Fury which has a similar chassis, the engine bay is quite small, a rover v8 will fit but this is actually quite a small engine having single cam shafts. Also I think the engine is slightly angles and off set to the passenger side so exhausts may not be equal, finally the tunnel is quite tight even for a type 9 so anything much bigger may not fit. Definitely worth doing some measurements to make sure it all physically fits.

I know there is at least one Mazda V6 engine in a Fury/Stylus (Claire Rule?) that might be worth looking at pictures for and there is a Jag V6 project on here that has quite a bit of info, worth looking to see if there is an adaptor plate for a 5speed RX8 box (which I think is the same as the MX5 but with different bolt pattern) that might fit.

Sounds like an interesting project but if it is a Zetec E (the 1.6 version is not up to much), not a Zetec SE, the easiest swap would be for a 2.0l version and twin 45’s or bike carbs. All the best and keep us updated on progress.





---------------------------------------------------------------
1968 Ford Anglia 105e, 1.7 Zetec SE, Mk2 Escort Workd Cup front end, 5 link rear
Build Blog - http://Anglia1968.weebly.com

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Slimy38

posted on 11/4/26 at 07:17 AM Reply With Quote
Driveshaft to get from the new box to the existing diff?

Will you need to 'adjust' the interior for the gearshift? That could be a challenge depending on how tidy the interior is.

Exhaust fabrication/routing?

Is the car on a Q plate? If so you don't need to worry about the change in emissions, if not then it could be 'interesting'.

As a side project I have been looking out for Jag/Mondeo V6's for my own car (not a Stylus), they seem to be a bit more expensive than they have been. I don't know whether they're getting harder to find in running condition? I'm not sure whether my selection criteria is a bit tight.

Please post updates though, I'm very interested in how you get on and any gotchas that you have to deal with.

[Edited on 11/4/26 by Slimy38]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
40inches

posted on 11/4/26 at 08:55 AM Reply With Quote
If you look in my photo archive there are lots of photos
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Nile_rt

posted on 11/4/26 at 12:27 PM Reply With Quote
If you can find a Mazda KL V6 engine that's what I'd use. Smaller and lighter than Ford/Jag engine
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
number-1

posted on 12/4/26 at 09:53 PM Reply With Quote
Are you on the Facebook SSC stylus owners club page? Im pretty sure someone on there has the Jag set up with the V6 3L
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dai1983

posted on 16/4/26 at 06:22 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by number-1
Are you on the Facebook SSC stylus owners club page? Im pretty sure someone on there has the Jag set up with the V6 3L


This.

The Jag inlet is quite big so the car above has it sticking out the bonnet but the st220 is smaller. They are short on the ground now so priced accordingly. Rocketeer do carbon plenums that are small and would give loads of clearance.

Jag gearbox is pretty small so a good thing and read it was hard to get a solid flywheel for them.

Would go duratec 2.5 with cams or ecoboost 1.6 tbh

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scudderfish

posted on 17/4/26 at 10:07 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Slimy38
Is the car on a Q plate? If so you don't need to worry about the change in emissions, if not then it could be 'interesting'.
[Edited on 11/4/26 by Slimy38]


Emissions are tested on the age of the engine at first registration, tax is based on the engine currently fitted. I'd expect to be able to get better emissions out of an EFI engine than carbs

I've got a Fury with a V8 (and Speeduino, used to be MS1) if you want any photos of a large lump in one. My gearbox is an LT77. Definitely an interesting sounding project, where in the country are you?

Regards,
David

[Edited on 17/4/26 by scudderfish]





https://vetuner.co.uk

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick9one1

posted on 20/4/26 at 08:55 AM Reply With Quote
thanks scudderfish.

I was also looking at using the speeduino.

The Fury's look a little easier to work on as the have the full flip front bonnet. The stylus was changed to a one piece body, (for aesthetic reasons), but this undoubtedly makes it more awkward to work on without removing the whole body. But they did also make the engine bay larger, which will help.

this isn't the car I'm looking at but is a good example of the bodywork changes.


I'm based in Nottingham

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
spegru

posted on 10/5/26 at 09:12 AM Reply With Quote
As luck would have it I have a stylus (with zetec) and also a Gilbern invader with an AJ30.
For anything like this you will probably need and X Type sump as the S type one has a ridiculous front bowl thing. You probably wont be able to use the original jaguar inlet plenum like I did on the Gilbern, so youlll need to think rocketeer carbon thing or Mondeo v6 or fab something yourself similar to HJR Garage on youtube.
Youll need a standalone ECU. Im using Motorsport electronics but I hear good things about Emerald.
These engines are cheap and plentiful and seem quite compact, Length should not be a problem and although you might think they are alot wider in fact that may not be too bad as exhausts point downwards. id suggest side mounted silencers. I already did that on one side for my Zetec stylus. Height may be more of an issue (see inlet) Steering shaft clearance round exhaust will likely be a consideration too but not insurmountable. Custom exhaust manifold may also be necessary. I used modified second had mondeo v6 bits.
Id say that the stylus is a bit deeper in the engine bay than a fury and also that a flip front is not that necessary
Gearbox wise probably the simplest is to use the jaguar box or an RX8 box with adaptor plate from the guy who advertises on facebook - thats what I have on the Gilbern. Some tunnel mods could be necessary on a stylus and the gear lever position could end up too far back - although I have a solution for that.

Happy to help as i do have some useful reference points!



[Edited on 10/5/26 by spegru]





Check out Invader Garage on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3C55qk-tbKc0WjmxGqFoXg

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mgb281

posted on 13/5/26 at 06:16 PM Reply With Quote
There is quite a bit of info out there if you can find, the first useful bit is how to modify the RX8 adapter plate to fit a Mondeo V6 solid flywheel which is in the following link; VW 1K0973202
Having done that you need to find a clutch, again Rock Auto can supply LUK or Exedy plus a few cheaper ones. A Ford Contour (Mondeo) sump is around £50
Gaskets etc are also much cheaper as well.
Don't forget that you will have to pay VAT and Shipping on top but DHL normally deliver in four days, Summit Racing are another good source for parts but you have to pay the VAT when it arrives in the UK

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick9one1

posted on 14/5/26 at 10:44 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks for the replies - Some really useful info suggested.

Summarising here:

• Sump: Use the Jaguar X-Type sump or a Mondeo V6 sump
• Gearbox Options: Jaguar gearbox or an RX8 gearbox via an adapter plate
• Flywheel: A Mondeo V6 solid flywheel can be adapted to fit the RX8 setup.
• Drivetrain Mods: custom prop-shaft and potentially modify the transmission tunnel
• Bonnet Clearance: The standard Jag inlet plenum is very tall. Use a Mondeo V6 inlet, Rocketeer carbon plenums, or fabricate a low-profile setup.
• Exhaust: Space will be tight around the steering shaft. Modify Mondeo V6 manifolds. Side-mounted silencers to save space.
• ECU: Speeduino, ME (Motorsport Electronics), or Emerald.


In regards to the gearbox choice, how is the gearing using the RX8 box on a AJ-30?

The RX-8 was designed for a high-revving, low-torque rotary engine and the Jag box was designed for a torquey, lower-revving V6, their gear ratios and driving characteristics are going to be massively different?


[Edited on 14/5/26 by nick9one1]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick9one1

posted on 14/5/26 at 10:58 AM Reply With Quote
I've been querying Googles Gemini Pro (AI) on my question

If you're dropping a 240hp AJ30 into a Stylus that only weighs around 600–650 kg, you're dealing with a monstrous power-to-weight ratio. At that point, your acceleration is less about engine power and much more about rear-wheel traction and time lost during gear shifts. Every manual gear change costs you roughly 0.3 to 0.5 seconds, which makes a massive difference in a car this light.

Here is how the gearboxes stack up for those benchmark sprints based on the gearing numbers:

0–60 mph: The RX-8 5-Speed Wins

Mazda RX-8 5-Speed: This is the clear winner for the 0–60 sprint. Because 2nd gear tops out at 64 mph, you only have to make one gear change (1st to 2nd).

Mazda RX-8 6-Speed: 2nd gear ends frustratingly early at 57 mph. This forces you to execute a second, time-consuming shift into 3rd gear just to cross the 60 mph line. You'll lose about half a second to the 5-speed here.

Jaguar Getrag 221: The weirdly short 2nd gear limits you to 53 mph. Just like the RX-8 6-speed, you're forced into a second gear change to hit 60.

0–100 mph: A Closer Race (Slight Edge to the RX-8 6-Speed)

Mazda RX-8 6-Speed: To reach 100 mph, you have to shift into 4th gear (max 109 mph), meaning you make three shifts in total. However, because the gears are so tightly packed, every time you shift, the engine drops right back into the absolute peak of its powerband. If you can shift quickly, the relentless, close-ratio acceleration will likely edge out the others at higher speeds.

Mazda RX-8 5-Speed: You also need three shifts to reach 100 mph (shifting into 4th gear, which maxes at 130 mph). The longer gears mean the RPMs will drop a bit further between shifts compared to the 6-speed, but the AJ30 V6 has plenty of torque to pull through it.

Jaguar Getrag 221: Again, you need three shifts to get into 4th gear. However, the massive gap between 2nd (53 mph) and 3rd (84 mph) means the RPMs will drop significantly when you make that specific shift, potentially bogging down your acceleration time slightly compared to the close-ratio Mazdas.

The Verdict
If you care about pub bragging rights for your 0–60 time, the Mazda RX-8 5-speed is the undisputed champion because it saves you that crucial gear shift. It's generally considered the best all-around driver's gearbox for these V6 kit cars!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
mgb281

posted on 14/5/26 at 06:42 PM Reply With Quote
The Rx8 gearbox is just one use of the Aisin 6 speed gearbox, it was also used in the Honda S2000 and Lexus IS200 and maybe the IS250, it wasn't designed for the very high RPM of the 231 engine and due to that the synchro's fail. The maximum speeds quoted in the gears are with what CWP ratios? I played around with a gear ratio calculator to get what I wanted which was a comfortable cruiser, therefore fifth gear gives me 28mph per 1000 engine revs, also 100mph in third gear. In a Lotus 7 clone the aerodynamics will restrict you maximum speed, remember that torque is all important and since the AJV6 can produce a fairy level 200ftlbs from 2000 rpm the spacing of the gears is less relevant.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mgb281

posted on 15/5/26 at 07:07 AM Reply With Quote
I forgot to add that you don’t modify the Mondeo V6 flywheel but you move the starter motor inwards by IIRC 4.25mm and swap a Zetec starter motor pinion for the S Type one
The Mondeo ST220 inlet manifold probably sits as low as anything else, I modified mine so it faces forward rather than backwards so that it sits under a MGB bonnet.
Virtually any aftermarket ECU will work, choosing one where there is already a map to use makes it simpler.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick9one1

posted on 15/5/26 at 08:23 AM Reply With Quote
good point. I forgot to tell it they would all be using the same final drive





Analysis of the Setup:

The RX-8 5-Speed (The Dark Horse): This gearbox (found in the lower-power 192ps European/JDM RX-8s) actually has the best-suited gear ratios for a V6 swap into an Escort. It has a much longer 1st gear (3.136) compared to the others, meaning you get a very usable 37 mph out of 1st gear instead of just making tire smoke.

The 1:1 Ceiling: Both the Jaguar 5-speed and the RX-8 6-speed reach their direct 1:1 ratio in 5th gear. At the 6,800 RPM redline, both will top out at roughly 118 mph in 5th gear with a 3.89 rear axle.

Highway Cruising Reality: At a cruising speed of 70 mph, the Jaguar 5-speed will sit at roughly 4,000 RPM in top gear. Both RX-8 gearboxes feature an overdrive top gear (5th for the 5-speed, 6th for the 6-speed), which drops that 70 mph cruising RPM down to a much more comfortable 3,250 RPM (5-speed) or 3,350 RPM (6-speed).

[Edited on 15/5/26 by nick9one1]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.