Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: Aesthetics: Book vs McSorley 442
akumabito

posted on 23/12/05 at 10:27 PM Reply With Quote
Aesthetics: Book vs McSorley 442

I was wondering which of the two designs is the prettiest? I mean, which of the two would look better proportioned? (if that makes any sense) I guess nobody has pictures comparing them side by side for a good comparrison..? A couple of inch here and there doesn't sound like a whole lot, but since the 7 is a tiny car to begin with... opinions?
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Triton

posted on 23/12/05 at 10:29 PM Reply With Quote
Book width but chop 3 inches out of the cockpit





My Daughter has taken over production of the damn fine Triton race seats and her contact email is emmatrs@live.co.uk.

www.tritonraceseats.com

www.hairyhedgehog.com

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeR

posted on 23/12/05 at 11:14 PM Reply With Quote
and make sure you're only 5'8" at a guess!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Triton

posted on 24/12/05 at 08:38 AM Reply With Quote
5ft 5" ideal size........





My Daughter has taken over production of the damn fine Triton race seats and her contact email is emmatrs@live.co.uk.

www.tritonraceseats.com

www.hairyhedgehog.com

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Marcus

posted on 24/12/05 at 10:11 AM Reply With Quote
An inch is quite a lot (ask the wife!)
I think even an Indy or Mac1 etc looks too heavy in the sides.
Just my opinion.

Marcus





Marcus


Because kits are for girls!!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
smart51

posted on 24/12/05 at 11:00 AM Reply With Quote
The book chassis width is good if using an escort rear axle. With the wider sierra it looks a bit silly because if the width of the rear wings. With a sierra axle, use a wider body, you may as well.

The chassis needn't be anly longer than the book, unless you want to fit a long engine. A 6'10" friend of mine can sit in the passenger side of my vortx with straight legs without his feet touching the bulk head. There is room for a bit of weight saving in the cockpit area I think.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
I love speed :-P

posted on 25/12/05 at 09:28 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Triton
Book width but chop 3 inches out of the cockpit


exactly





Don't Steal
The Government doesn’t like the competition

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
derf

posted on 25/12/05 at 02:13 PM Reply With Quote
For looks only, just move the scuttle back a few inches. Here is an excerpt fron Keith Tanners website, he wrote the American book (it has more pages, bigger=better)

http://cheapsportscar.net/flip.php?x=758

The most obvious difference between my car and a Caterham is the placement of the scuttle. The steering wheel is in approximately the same place on both cars. This explains why my engine appears so much further back than the Caterhams and why a Caterham shift knob always appears to be so far forward. Due to the rearward placement, the scuttle is wider and this is one reason my windshield looks tall. Despite appearances, the wheelbase is almost identical.


View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.