DANMAN
|
| posted on 6/8/13 at 11:37 AM |
|
|
MNR Reverse box Vs "other brand" reverse boxes?
I have been looking about on the web and have read some bits & pieces about the MNR boxes being less chattery with less backlash and also suck
less power from the drive train compared to other boxes. Is there any truth in this? Has anyone done any back to back testing or changed from another
box to the MNR?
Daily Driver - Audi A4 2L Turbo Quattro
Work Horse - Falcon XR8 Ute - Now Supercharged!
Rally Beast - 1972 Ford Escort 2L
Off The Road - Locost 2L Turbo (Z1 Concept)
Track Car - Stuart Taylor Blade
|
|
|
|
|
fesycresy
|
| posted on 6/8/13 at 12:40 PM |
|
|
I believe they did a dyno run with a Quaife and their box. I think the losses were much less than the Quaife.
I'd rather run an MNR than the Quaife with all the failures you hear about, or that may just be down to the fact that I've seen the
breather vented to atmosphere instead of into a catch tank and allowed to drain back into the box?
However, I tried to buy a reverse box from MNR and they said they had troubles with one of their suppliers and didn't know if they were going to
make any more. Not good if you want spares a few years down the line??
I ended up getting a Nova Racing box after hearing all the good feed back about their customer service, spares available off the shelf and they use
them in Legend racing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you'll have to catch up.
|
|
|
.jpg){kind=avatar}
