Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Triangulation on cycle wing carriers?
eznfrank

posted on 4/5/10 at 11:32 AM Reply With Quote
Triangulation on cycle wing carriers?

I need to fix my cycle wing carriers (cos I buggered them up) and I wondered if a tiny triangulation in the corners would help with the strength?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Wumps

posted on 4/5/10 at 11:56 AM Reply With Quote
It appears that many designs incorporate this so I would say yes.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 4/5/10 at 11:58 AM Reply With Quote
It could help, but you need to make sure you don't just introduce another stress raiser by doing this, or it will simply move the point of failure.

A smooth curve rather than a straight line will help to spread the stress out over a wider area (just like Locost bottom wishbone plates)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 4/5/10 at 12:04 PM Reply With Quote
You need to constrain the wing in all 3 dimensions to stop it bouncing around.

This isn't particularly difficult and usually just involves adding a 3rd stay like this

Front sus
Front sus


The top 2 were the originals which both broke (both sides as well) in under 100miles.

The one at the foreground of the pic was added and they are now pretty much solid and have been ok for the last 6000miles.

You may also notice I added in small 'triangulations' where the flat bar meets the main stay which stopped them breaking off short term before fitting the 3rd stay.





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
BenB

posted on 4/5/10 at 12:06 PM Reply With Quote
I'd also suggest curved angulation, good idea. Would look lighter too!
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
andylancaster3000

posted on 4/5/10 at 12:21 PM Reply With Quote
I witter on about this all the time but if you can move away from using flat strip and use just tube you'll end up with a far stiffer, lighter, less fatigue prone structure. We had a play with some small diameter tube and a tube bender and came up with these:




Dead stiff, absolutely no fluttering and you can still get the arch nice and close to the wheel. No sign of failure yet (ignoring the damage when some tin-top reversed into me at snett last year )

Just my two pennies...





[Edited on 4/5/10 by andylancaster3000]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
daviep

posted on 4/5/10 at 01:10 PM Reply With Quote
I also did mine in round tube, but used a much smaller size, 10mm hydraulic tubing to be exact. 1000miles and no breakage but they do flutter a bit.

Regards
Davie

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.