r1_pete
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 10:37 AM |
|
|
Looks like we'll have a few less non desirables to support
Abu Hamza Link
[Edited on 10/4/12 by r1_pete]
|
|
|
|
|
Alfa145
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 10:45 AM |
|
|
They still have 3 months to appeal! So 3 more months of lawyers making more money and the tax payer loosing more money. 
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 12:23 PM |
|
|
Just keep thinking of 100 years in an American prison, you'll be smiling anyway!
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
trextr7monkey
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 01:30 PM |
|
|
That guy sums up everyhing that has buggered up Britain , thesooner he is on his way the better it will be for everybody.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14016102@N00/ (cut and paste this dodgey link)
Our most recent pics are here:
http://s129.photobucket.com/albums/p211/trextr7monkey/
|
|
|
Wheels244
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 01:46 PM |
|
|
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
No Sky TV and pool tables where these scum are going 
|
|
|
T66
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 02:03 PM |
|
|
GB is buggered as it completely fails to deal with these people as its bound up in the human rights act, in an anal sort of way, as if trying to
insert itself up its own arse.
Meanwhile barristers line their enormous pockets, Oh and now pay less tax ! Odd that....
Wait for the home secretary to be on the news later, blabbing tough talk as if this is a success.
|
|
|
Irony
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 02:31 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by T66
Wait for the home secretary to be on the news later, blabbing tough talk as if this is a success.
Totally agree - they will claim success for something that should have happened without any fuss in the first place. The whole episode is a utter
failure because it has taken all these years to get rid of him.
All someone needs to do is follow a simple diagram
'Is he a bad guy?'
Yes.
'Send him away then.'
Jobs a goodun
|
|
|
cliftyhanger
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 03:38 PM |
|
|
I think this is actually a good result for us all. Forget all the hype, I can see why this went to the European court.
The "defendants" are worried that IF they are found guilty, they MAY be kept in solitary and for a long time.
The court has come back with the logical reply. Sort of "yes, that is correct" no statement of guilt or innocence, just that IF guilty,
the US can imprison them and tough luck. Good call I say, hopefully now an established precedent 
|
|
|
omega 24 v6
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 04:34 PM |
|
|
Yes I agree the system sucks etc etc. BUT at least sense MAY have been seen so its a start I suppose. Hope he rots away slowly.
If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.
|
|
|
scootz
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 04:42 PM |
|
|
Hope he gets all upset, forgets about his hook, and then wipes the tears away from his good eye!
It's Evolution Baby!
|
|
|
trextr7monkey
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 05:03 PM |
|
|
Hi Scootz, putting aside the Captain Hook's death jokes, rich and entertaining gentre though it be, he has been a regular in Private Eye over
the last year or so with a fresh caption each time on the same old, unflattering, badly taken picture.
From what I can recall he was, allegedly, proclaiming such witty gems as:
" I have no hand in terroism" and everybodys favourite " I was Bin Laden's right hand man" there were others but you
get the drift
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14016102@N00/ (cut and paste this dodgey link)
Our most recent pics are here:
http://s129.photobucket.com/albums/p211/trextr7monkey/
|
|
|
morcus
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 06:19 PM |
|
|
As someone else said, the best thing about whats happened is we've established a president that a long sentence of solitary confinement in a US
prison if found guilty is not a breach of the EU's vision of Human rights.
Personally, I think we should formulate a way to try and punish people who fight extradition at the expense of the other country as it would make the
whole thing alot easier as you would have established whether they were guilty or not, an actual extradition after this point should be much simpler.
To be honest though, why would you fight extradition to a country that isn't corrupt unless you were guilty?
In a White Room, With Black Curtains, By the Station.
|
|
|
mad-butcher
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 07:17 PM |
|
|
Don't get me wrong but I don't see this guy as being all that important, the reason being, and I'll use Mossad as an example if they
want some one they get them, Israeli dimplomatic aircraft lands at obscure uk airport on same day terrorist is being moved between prisons ( strangely
enough with minimum security) van transporting him gets hijacked in some quiet rural area, jet takes off, by the time it's reported aircraft is
in international airspace. MI5 etc deny any involvement, job done. not rocket science if you want to help a friend out, still even better shoot the
fcuker
tony
|
|
|
morcus
|
| posted on 10/4/12 at 07:41 PM |
|
|
Extra judicial executions never really solved anything and cause far more problems than there worth. It's much better that we have trials so we
can get a better understanding of what has happened and why which is important to stop things from happening again. Also, depending on how you look at
it, being killed isn't much of a punishment compared to a propper prison sentence (Which I believe US prison still provide as they aren't
parties of any treatys saying they won't use prisoners as Slave labour, which they do and don't recognise the same 'basic human
rights' as the rest of the western world.). Worst of all is by killing someone they've brought you down to their level.
I agree with you on the other bit about setting up a situation like that, and that kind of thing does happen. But can you see the CIA managing to pull
that off without killing anyone?
Now that we've sorted these guy's out can we send Assange to Sweden to stand trial for his sex offences?
In a White Room, With Black Curtains, By the Station.
|
|
|
