Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Fireblade - Coil on Plug Conversion
gingerprince

posted on 10/7/13 at 08:42 PM Reply With Quote
Fireblade - Coil on Plug Conversion

So I've had an ongoing issue with my 918 'blade in my Indy, where it's been having dodgy tickover issues at idle when hot. Have been ruling a few things out by trial and error, and next on the list was coil packs. I had already replaced HT leads, plug caps and plugs which didn't fix the issue. So, I needed to get a replacement coil pack or 2, which are going for about 30 quid on ebay.

Bit more research, and I came across the concept of converting from traditional coil pack/HT leads. This would let me rule out coil packs, and potentially cheap HT leads leaking, and give me a more modern ignition system - for about the same price as just ruling it out.

So I found a set of stick coils, complete with sub loom on ebay for 35 quid delivered, butchered the loom, et voila: -

Coil Pack Replacement
Coil Pack Replacement


So in theory I should have fewer issues due to old coils/HT leads, and more reliable spark.


As it turns out, an extended blat this evening reveals it hasn't fixed the issue, but that's for another thread

I have saved a net 200g in weight though

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ashg

posted on 10/7/13 at 09:04 PM Reply With Quote
how are you controlling the dwell on them it wont be the same as the previous coil packs and will eventually end in failure.





Anything With Tits or Wheels Will cost you MONEY!!

Haynes Roadster (Finished)
Exocet (Finished & Sold)
New Project (Started)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 10/7/13 at 09:47 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ashg
how are you controlling the dwell on them it wont be the same as the previous coil packs and will eventually end in failure.


Not to mention each coil driver is now driving two coils in parallel.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
gingerprince

posted on 14/7/13 at 01:44 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Not to mention each coil driver is now driving two coils in parallel.


The coils are wired in series, so the resistance for each pair is the same, so I don't believe there's any risk to the ECU.


quote:
how are you controlling the dwell on them it wont be the same as the previous coil packs and will eventually end in failure.


I'll be honest, I don't really have a clue what that means I've pretty much just followed a couple of articles, such as the one below, and an article in Practical Sportsbikes magazine.

http://www.rrzone.com/forums/showthread.php/5894-STICK-COIL-MOD

However having done a bit more reading on the subject now (gate, horse, bolted etc) I think I understand it a bit. I guess the issue is, if the new coils charge quicker than the old coils, they may overheat and break down. Obviously quite a few people have done this mod, so it must work (and seems fine so far), but thoughts as to why I think it's OK from what I've read are: -

* They're wired in series, so the resistance as the ECU sees it is the same - so shouldn't break that.
* The coils are designed for individual firing in their original installation, rather than wasted spark, so in theory they will only have at maximum half the amount of time to build up charge in this installation, depending on how the ECU controls dwell time in the old ECU.
* Since they're wired in series, the potential is divided between them, which means they're charging with only 6v not 12v, which again will reduce the spark.

Based on the above, I'm deducing that if anything I'm more likely to have issues with not enough dwell time at high RPM (due to firing twice as often, and lower voltage) rather than running too hot and breaking down. Haven't felt any evidence of this though - not sure whether it'd be obvious or subtle?

I won't be chucking the old coils away though - the modification hasn't fixed my idle, so I think my old setup was probably OK. What I may do is make a mount so I can easily swap between two configurations by remounting where the original coils go, so I can do a side-by-side "seat of the pants" dyno to see if I can feel any loss of power due to unsufficient spark at high RPMs.

Thanks for pointing this out - it's generated some more reading potential in any case!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mef

posted on 26/7/13 at 09:46 AM Reply With Quote
coil packs

Running your coils in series and hence only 6v across each primary will seriously reduce the spark quality, ie 1/4 of the power of a coil run on 12V. Not ideal when pulling high revs! You should ideally run a 4 channel amp module to drive them individually but fired in pairs. An amp such as the Bosch 211 would be ideal for this application, wire the inputs in 2 pairs (this is assuming your ecu will drive an external amp) see http://www.microsquirt.info/Bosch_211.htm

Martin

[Edited on 26/7/13 by mef]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
BaileyPerformance

posted on 26/7/13 at 10:26 AM Reply With Quote
stick with coil pack, but use a gen1 Ford coilpack with car leads (you can make them up using an XR2i set)

A good coilpack is better then COP, we have proven this on a 2008 Hayabusa in a grass car, the stock bike COPs do not produce the same amount of energy as a stock Ford coilpack plus over dwell is not so critical on the coilpack but is critical on COP due to there hot location. Therefore you can run slightly more dwell to get a fatter spark on the coilpack.

www.baileyperformance.co.uk

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
olimarler

posted on 26/7/13 at 10:31 AM Reply With Quote
I've been thinking about doing this too.

The honda cbr forum a lot of them are doing this mod with very good success.

Oli

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mef

posted on 26/7/13 at 10:59 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BaileyPerformance
stick with coil pack, but use a gen1 Ford coilpack with car leads (you can make them up using an XR2i set)

A good coilpack is better then COP, we have proven this on a 2008 Hayabusa in a grass car, the stock bike COPs do not produce the same amount of energy as a stock Ford coilpack plus over dwell is not so critical on the coilpack but is critical on COP due to there hot location. Therefore you can run slightly more dwell to get a fatter spark on the coilpack.

www.baileyperformance.co.uk


Yes, you dont get anything for free, the quality of the spark is directly proportional to the amount of copper wire and magnetic core in the coil, in this case bigger is definitely better! a puney cop just cant produce the fat spark of a proper coil!

Martin

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Brackers

posted on 13/9/15 at 04:11 PM Reply With Quote
Fireblade coil packs

Hi, I think I might have a similar problem - 1997 fireblade in Indy, been off road for over a year, now running and started up first time.
Fine ticking over and starts to warm up - giving a bit of throttle and sounds really smooth. After about 3-4 mins with engine warming up, as soon as you give any throttle at all, even slowly rolling it on, it wants to cut out.

Turn engine off and leave for a min, start back up with no probs, same again, runs for less time this time (obviously a temp issue) and again when you give any throttle, wants to die.

Ive emptied the tank, changed full filter, cleaned carbs and jets because of fuel sitting there and still same issue.

Never checked the colds, but could it be this?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.