Eggy
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 06:07 PM |
|
|
Anyone recongise these two?
Does anyone know anything about these two??
LINK
LINK
|
|
|
|
|
Paul (Notts)
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 06:13 PM |
|
|
Is the green one correctly registerd ...
or is it still down as a seirra?
Paul
|
|
|
Eggy
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 06:16 PM |
|
|
I'm not sure. It's advertised as being RH on the log book but P reg. The rear photo shows B reg????
|
|
|
DRC INDY 7
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 06:27 PM |
|
|
To be blunt the green one looks iffy and bloody awfull why would you 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/462610273778799/
Puddle Dodgers Club
|
|
|
snapper
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 07:04 PM |
|
|
Black one looks a good example of an S7, possibly an early S3, the green one is an Exmo with those front pillars for a macpherson strut front
suspension.
Both are monocoques, i.e no chassis.
Lighter than the tubular 2b's.
Worth talking to the Robin Hood owners club for more info on these type of cars.
With the seat belts coming off the rear of the tub i would think they were registered pre SVA
I eat to survive
I drink to forget
I breath to pi55 my ex wife off (and now my ex partner)
|
|
|
Eggy
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 07:10 PM |
|
|
Thanks to all 
|
|
|
speedyxjs
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 07:48 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by DRC INDY 7
To be blunt the green one looks iffy and bloody awfull why would you
I wonder what the ground clearance is? Seems a bit high for my liking
How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?
|
|
|
ReMan
|
| posted on 15/7/09 at 08:43 PM |
|
|
Who cares it is "OFFICIAL LAMBO GREEN"
|
|
|
