Rob Lane
|
| posted on 21/6/04 at 09:09 AM |
|
|
In chat room now.
Took me a while to realise it was linked at top.
There's me and Ned online now! 1009am
|
|
|
|
|
barrie sharp
|
| posted on 21/6/04 at 09:22 AM |
|
|
you didnt have much to talk about gone by 1015
the cars looking good" a blind man would be pleased to see it"
''stop press'' the blind mans seen it said "it felt ok"
|
|
|
Rob Lane
|
| posted on 21/6/04 at 10:42 AM |
|
|
Yep! No sooner had posted than typically things here got busy and I had to log off.
Must remember to Log Off properly from Forum
|
|
|
Screwy
|
| posted on 22/6/04 at 02:35 PM |
|
|
There where a few people in when i dropped by for a nosy Joelp,Viper and flackmonkey iirc .Think that was around 11:00-11:15
I think things will improve when the chatroom actually lists who,s in there as you could then log into chat when you browse the forum and if it shows
people in there your more likely to stop for a chinwag
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 22/6/04 at 02:46 PM |
|
|
thats a good point screwy, it can be too busy at the minute cos its always either empty, or if theres a thread mentioning it, its too full. with a
list of whose in on the front page it would be more steady.
by the way chris, it works very well! thanks.
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
Screwy
|
| posted on 22/6/04 at 03:17 PM |
|
|
To full isnt really a problem imo , ive used Irc (Internet relay chat)for many years and the channels i frequent have anything from 30-60 ppl in , you
soon get used to having multiple conversations in two or three different channels whilst other people have there own conversations around yours though
i will admit its very confusing at first 
|
|
|
