givemethebighammer
|
| posted on 23/4/04 at 03:30 PM |
|
|
Speed camera flaw ?
I was stopped in a queue next to a Truvelo stopped camera today. Couldn't help but notice that the flash and the camera glass front covers were
held on with large circlips. Now without wanting to put ideas in anyone's head. Surely the authorities would have worked out that taking one of
these covers off and inserting something flammable into the inside of the box (or even maybe removing / damaging the camera) is far quicker and less
conspicuous than putting an old tyre over the camera and setting fire to it ? (probably more effective too).
If they are going to waste our money on cameras, the least they can do is make them a little durable.
|
|
|
|
|
ned
|
| posted on 23/4/04 at 03:32 PM |
|
|
one could conceivably put something inside the front cover to obscure the lense if this was the case without damaging the camera. the response time to
get it fixed would probably be the same and it wouldn't cost hte taxpayer as much as a new camera wouldn't be required.
Ned.
beware, I've got yellow skin
|
|
|
Mk-Ninja
|
| posted on 23/4/04 at 04:05 PM |
|
|
Let me know if works Ned
I'm sure I've got one, just don't know where I've put it
|
|
|
givemethebighammer
|
| posted on 23/4/04 at 07:15 PM |
|
|
probably longer to fix it Ned, it would take them a while to realise that the lense had been obscured. Bit more subtle than torching it from the
outside !!
|
|
|
DavidM
|
| posted on 23/4/04 at 07:40 PM |
|
|
Replace glass with two way mirror. Looks normal from the outside but the camera only sees a reflection of itself. Could take them ages to realise.
My life now feels a whole lot sadder for even giving this a thought.
|
|
|
Mark Allanson
|
| posted on 23/4/04 at 08:01 PM |
|
|
A picture of the local chief constable's car mounted 18" infront of the camera without obscuring the detection equipment - should be good
for a laugh
If you can keep you head, whilst all others around you are losing theirs, you are not fully aware of the situation
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 23/4/04 at 08:30 PM |
|
|
i would just spray the lens with paint, then its criminal damage rather than arson or explosive charges.
then again, i couldnt actually be arsed myself...!
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
thekafer
|
| posted on 23/4/04 at 10:12 PM |
|
|
How about a pen lazer (lazer pointer) mounted blocks away and powered by a a/c transformer pointing directly into the lens?
Get someones finger prints on it and then set it up. "excuse me officer, could you hold this while I sign this citation..?"
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy...
|
|
|
mangogrooveworkshop
|
| posted on 24/4/04 at 12:47 PM |
|
|
The africans have a sledgehammer method they blast them with shotguns and place a landmine at the base to get the poor basterd sent to change the
film.
On the north coast road out of Durban they had a pesky camera that was set up every day by two cops...after the land mines where found they didnt set
their camera up again at that spot.
|
|
|
Spyderman
|
| posted on 24/4/04 at 09:36 PM |
|
|
The latest dirty tricks they are doing in Staffordshire, where the cameras have been established for quite a while is to reduce the speed limit from
40 to 30mph without any warning or notification.
Apparently they put up warnings for a week or so (supposedly), then removed them.
They simply remove the 40mph signs and rake in the revenue from all the locals who were used to the previous speed limit. 
How can these Bar stewards get away with it?
Terry
Spyderman
|
|
|
David Jenkins
|
| posted on 25/4/04 at 10:35 AM |
|
|
I'm surprised that no-one does what the amateur photographers do to get an 'artistic' blurry shot - they smear vaseline lightly over
a filter. (this is starting to sound a bit 'ooer - missus!' )
A slight coat of vaseline or grease (not enough to be noticed in a hurry) should be more than enough to spoil the camera's resolution...
anon.
|
|
|
