Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Air filter options - what are your opinions?
ditchlewis

posted on 7/4/08 at 03:30 PM Reply With Quote
Air filter options - what are your opinions?

I’ve been reading all the threads that I can about performance filters and I’ve not got to grips with the pro’s and con’s of each type.

As I understand it there are two main types, foam filters and boxes such as K&N with wire like filters.

I get the impression that the box filters are the best and then foam and finally the carb sock.

Is this so?

And why?

The problem I have is space. I have 65mm from the face of the carb to the chassis rail which sits right across the centre of the carb mouth. I have some K&N filters which came with the engine but they are 75mm deep and so won’t fit. If I get thinner ones then the air flow will be reduced (less area) and therefore less horse power.

I have used carb socks, but one was blown apart in a carb back fire and luckily none was ingested by the engine.

The piper cross box for the pinto with 45’s is £200 and I believe it will not fit properly with out fouling the chassis. A lot of money to risk!

David J is making a filter for his bike carbs and that has got me thinking (I know a dangerous past time).

I had thought about making a box filter like the diagramme below with a cone filter on the end (80mm seems to be the diam that allows for up to 170 bhp).

The other alternative would be like the other diagramme, made of angle and mesh and covered in the foam type of material as David J.

What are your opinions..

Ditch
Rescued attachment box option 1.JPG
Rescued attachment box option 1.JPG

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
ditchlewis

posted on 7/4/08 at 03:31 PM Reply With Quote
here is the foam option Rescued attachment box option 1.JPG
Rescued attachment box option 1.JPG

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
ditchlewis

posted on 7/4/08 at 03:34 PM Reply With Quote
ooops two the same, here is the box

ditch Rescued attachment box option 2.JPG
Rescued attachment box option 2.JPG

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
coozer

posted on 7/4/08 at 03:38 PM Reply With Quote
I've gone for the box job in your bottom picture.

The outlet then goes to a BMC style air filter with a scoop in the nosecone to take cold air directly into the intake.





1972 V8 Jago

1980 Z750

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 7/4/08 at 03:52 PM Reply With Quote
get an old dyson, chuck the motor and stick a hose from your engine into the dustcollector outlet





Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
ditchlewis

posted on 7/4/08 at 03:59 PM Reply With Quote
^^^^ is that an upright dyson or the smaller type? just happen to have a small dyson in the garage which won't suck.

my first plan was the air box with a remote filter.

why are the "air boxes" better than the foam sox?

ditch

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 7/4/08 at 04:34 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ditchlewis
why are the "air boxes" better than the foam sox?


Socks in general are a poor second best to a larger "sausage" style filter or an airbox that supplies all throttles since the area of filter element that each throttle sees is far lower and hence more restrictive.

An air box will be quieter, it contains any 'stand off' from the carbs/throttle bodies, keeping it away from the filter element and it means you can duct in a source of cool air rather than sucking hot air straight from the engine bay.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
twybrow

posted on 7/4/08 at 04:57 PM Reply With Quote
I have option no 2. Seems a better choice to me....






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Eggy

posted on 7/4/08 at 05:32 PM Reply With Quote
I've had a go at similar - have a look in my archive

Sorry, I can 't post fotos for some reason????

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
snapper

posted on 7/4/08 at 05:34 PM Reply With Quote
What ever system you go for, how much cold air you can get in will make a huge difference, i am currently running a domed pipercross 600 series, i will cut side vents in the bonnet post SVA and when funds become available i will go for the pipercross airbox as it fits straight on the backplate and has a built in cone filter then duct cool air from the front, this should be worth 5 to 8%.
Its worth remembering that you will not gain bhp persay its just that you are not loosing the full potential of your level of tune by sucking in hot air.





I eat to survive
I drink to forget
I breath to pi55 my ex wife off (and now my ex partner)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ditchlewis

posted on 7/4/08 at 07:31 PM Reply With Quote
many thanks for the explanations lads.

i will go with my box option. i liked the idea of getting a clod air supply into the engine.

it's also easier to build.

should i use aluminium sheet folded or should i use fibre glass?

ditch

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
twybrow

posted on 7/4/08 at 07:57 PM Reply With Quote
I would think of how stiff you need the walls. Engines pull quite a vacuum, so as long as the aluminium is stiff enough to withstand the vac you will be fine!






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 7/4/08 at 09:04 PM Reply With Quote
if it pulls that much vacuum then your air filter is MUCH too restrictive!!

There should be virtually NO pressure drop across the filter at full engine power.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.