Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: Convert De dion to IRS Suspension
Aled_g

posted on 12/10/09 at 08:30 PM Reply With Quote
Convert De dion to IRS Suspension

hi guys, im looking to convert a de dion suspension setup on my locost to an independant rear suspension setup on the rear, but not sure which one would give the best performance and cost, considering camber, stability, etc. Please see pic for more details Rescued attachment 07102009092.jpg
Rescued attachment 07102009092.jpg

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MkII

posted on 12/10/09 at 08:37 PM Reply With Quote
caterham succesfully used a dedion set up for years, why do you want to go to all the trouble of changing yours. m.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Davey D

posted on 12/10/09 at 09:11 PM Reply With Quote
I really wouldnt bother changing it. It is a lot of messing around for little benefit






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mangogrooveworkshop

posted on 12/10/09 at 09:32 PM Reply With Quote
Mines dedion and its next to no differance in handling from the irs. Ocassionally it gets upset by an uneven surface but it sorts its selfout.
Great for hard starts and very predictable when it steps out.
Rather finish the car and drive it than make sweeping changes putting you back years.
By the way we have three cars in the gang 1 indy and 2 dedions one of which is a caterham,other mk .






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Aled_g

posted on 13/10/09 at 09:20 AM Reply With Quote
IRS Locost Suspension

It's for a project im doing in university, personally i would keep it at de dion setup but have to change it, i was thinking double wishbone or just one lateral arm at each suspension corner
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 13/10/09 at 10:48 AM Reply With Quote
If it's for a Uni project, does the car actually have to be finished and put on the road?

If not then I would seriously consider leaving the actual car as it is and making a seperate IRS rear end to demonstrate how it would be made.

This means you have the existing car in tact, ready to complete and put on the road with minimal hassle/cost. It also means you could put the new seperate IRS rear end allongside the actual car to properly illustrate the differences in suspension set-up.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 13/10/09 at 11:19 AM Reply With Quote
A single lateral arm is known as a swing axle --- don't even think about using that as a solution, it can be made to work under a given set of conditions but on the rear it is much more likely to result in a car that transitions from gentle understeer to extreme over steer in the blink of an eye.

De Dion is the best setup for a car of this layout ---- it gives much better camber control than an independent system.

[Edited on 13/10/09 by britishtrident]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Joe T

posted on 7/11/09 at 10:38 PM Reply With Quote
Stick with the De dion, so much of the rear end would have to be changed to little or no advantage.

Joe T

[Edited on 7/11/09 by Joe T]





Cheers

Joe T
Costin Roadster Project
Work in progress

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.