swanntech
|
| posted on 5/1/14 at 09:44 PM |
|
|
gearbox ratios 2.8 type 9
Hi can anyone please tell me the gaer ratio diference beetween a 2.8 type 9 and a 2.0 type 9.cheers
|
|
|
|
|
scimjim
|
| posted on 5/1/14 at 10:28 PM |
|
|
1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.3 V6
1st 3.65
2nd 1.97
3rd 1.37
4th 1
5th 0.82
2.8 inc 4x4
1st 3.36
2nd 1.81
3rd 1.26
4th 1
5th 0.83
diesel
1st 3.91
2nd 2.29
3rd 1.38
4th 1
5th 0.82
|
|
|
swanntech
|
| posted on 6/1/14 at 08:50 PM |
|
|
Thanks for that 2.8 box a better option
|
|
|
scimjim
|
| posted on 6/1/14 at 10:03 PM |
|
|
the 2.8 box has a longer input shaft (which can be modified or replaced) and is generally more expensive to begin with. You can fit a longer first to
a 4 pot/2.3 v6 (short input shaft) box - such as this 2.98 from Burtons
http://www.burtonpower.com/sierra-type-9-5-speed-2-98-1-long-1st-gear-conversion-kit-gbt9200.html
also - http://locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=161095
|
|
|
Paul Turner
|
| posted on 7/1/14 at 01:23 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by scimjim
the 2.8 box has a longer input shaft (which can be modified or replaced) and is generally more expensive to begin with.
V6 type 9 fitted to my car. Input shaft is standard but I have a 30mm Caterham spacer fitted between the bellhousing and gearbox. This means there
were no modifications needed to the input shaft and the gearlever is also 30mm further back.
Stick a Steve Perks long first kit on the V6 box and you a have a superb set of ratios for peanuts.
1st 2.75
2nd 1.81
3rd 1.26
4th 1
5th 0.83
|
|
|
swanntech
|
| posted on 8/1/14 at 08:52 PM |
|
|
Thanks for the information will help alot has steve perks got a web site
|
|
|
scimjim
|
| posted on 8/1/14 at 11:05 PM |
|
|
http://www.spcomponents.co.uk/
|
|
|
swanntech
|
| posted on 9/1/14 at 06:56 AM |
|
|
Thanks will have a look today
|
|
|
